Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Airline Pension Plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2014 | 06:29 PM
  #41  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Scambo

Well, yes rhetorical, but sort of my point--any .gov "annuity" is worth more than it looks because it might be collected at any age and it has no (little?) risk of failure. Using 401k money always puts the risk on the individual, which is why companies want them gone.

GF
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 06:34 PM
  #42  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Scambo

Well, yes rhetorical, but sort of my point--any .gov "annuity" is worth more than it looks because it might be collected at any age and it has no (little?) risk of failure. Using 401k money always puts the risk on the individual, which is why companies want them gone.

GF
Oh, okay, I see, you get it... I don't know if that makes you a tool like me, but...
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 06:42 PM
  #43  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

I could be in considerably worse company as a tool.

Hey, congrats to all DL pilots as "Airline of the Year"! Now if only my bags would show up!

GF
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 06:52 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Default

"A low income individual should bias towards a Roth to minimize the payment of taxes over his/her lifetime. Higher income individuals should be biasing toward taking the deduction now by contributing to a deductible 401K (for example) while their effective tax rate is likely higher, rather than contributing to a Roth now and paying that higher effective tax rate when they could have paid less tax in the future when they're likely making less money during retirement"

If you're a high earner, you should do both the Roth and the 401K. Minimize the taxes you pay now, and minimize the taxes you pay later. If you don't qualify for a Roth, it's easy to contribute to a traditional IRA and convert to a Roth, penalty free, the next day (ie backdoor Roth).

We gave an investor friend less than 20K of our traditional IRA money, 16 years ago. Three years ago, when it was worth 150K, we converted it to a Roth. Sucked up paying 50K in taxes (painful) for the conversion. It's now worth over 300K, and if he continues his annual rate of return of over 18%, (I know, amazing and hard to match, even for Bernie Madoff)...in 20 years, that's about 8 million. Tax free.

If we hadn't sucked up the 50K in taxes, all that money would taxed at the highest tax rate. With all the debt and entitlements this county is going to be paying for, that tax rate is only going straight up.
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 07:33 PM
  #45  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
"A low income individual should bias towards a Roth to minimize the payment of taxes over his/her lifetime. Higher income individuals should be biasing toward taking the deduction now by contributing to a deductible 401K (for example) while their effective tax rate is likely higher, rather than contributing to a Roth now and paying that higher effective tax rate when they could have paid less tax in the future when they're likely making less money during retirement"

If you're a high earner, you should do both the Roth and the 401K. Minimize the taxes you pay now, and minimize the taxes you pay later. If you don't qualify for a Roth, it's easy to contribute to a traditional IRA and convert to a Roth, penalty free, the next day (ie backdoor Roth).

We gave an investor friend less than 20K of our traditional IRA money, 16 years ago. Three years ago, when it was worth 150K, we converted it to a Roth. Sucked up paying 50K in taxes (painful) for the conversion. It's now worth over 300K, and if he continues his annual rate of return of over 18%, (I know, amazing and hard to match, even for Bernie Madoff)...in 20 years, that's about 8 million. Tax free.

If we hadn't sucked up the 50K in taxes, all that money would taxed at the highest tax rate. With all the debt and entitlements this county is going to be paying for, that tax rate is only going straight up.

18% a year?

If it sounds too good to be true...it probably is.

How do you know for certain your investor buddy isn't the next Bernie?

Read this: No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller: Harry Markopolos: 9780470919002: Amazon.com: Books

I'll give you the cliff notes: There are a whole lot more Bernie Madoffs out there.
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 08:21 PM
  #46  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Call me a cynic, but your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. Here's my prediction -- feel free to cut it out and save it for 10 years and tell me I'm wrong.

Today's marginal tax bracket for a guy making $250k with a "reasonable" amount of deductions is lower than his marginal tax bracket will be in retirement when his taxable income is $100k.
I don't itemize. I have zero deductions.



Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
No you didn't. Your PBGC benefit will still be taxed as ordinary income. Same with your military retirement (if you have one). Same with all the money Delta has contributed to your 401k and DC plans. That's a lot of taxable income in retirement. Even if you converted some to a Roth, I'll bet you'll still have 80% of your income in retirement coming from taxable sources. That also results in 85% of your SS being taxed too.
Most of what you said is true. No military retirement. All my 402k contributions from here on are ROTH. I'll believe the PBGC if I start cashing checks. Democrats cannot do math, and the physics of what they are doing will not stop because they feel bad about it. One way or another, they are coming after our retirement monies....



Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
You shoudn't. I really think you'll be glad you did, when Uncle Sam finally jacks marginal rates up to 50%+ as they were for the 60 years prior to Reagan. They will have to. We will be among the small group of people who actually have good income, even in retirement, to pay tax on.
We'll see. On one hand, I think you are right, because these clowns won't have anywhere else to get the money from. On the other though, If I don't take it out, they won't tax me on it, and the Mrs and I really aren't big consumers. (I STILL don't have a smart phone)....

The discussion is interesting, and has got me thinking about reevalutaing my strategy...
Reply
Old 02-09-2014 | 08:22 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
18% a year?

If it sounds too good to be true...it probably is.

How do you know for certain your investor buddy isn't the next Bernie?

Read this: No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller: Harry Markopolos: 9780470919002: Amazon.com: Books

I'll give you the cliff notes: There are a whole lot more Bernie Madoffs out there.
Oh, I know. Everyone I tell his rate of return says that. But in this case, this was my spouse's best friend from high school, who is incredibly ethical and I would trust him with my life. There have been articles written about him, he's been offered a hedge fund (refused), and also has refused to take new investors, including our son, for years. Most importantly, though, we follow every single trade he does on TD Ameritrade, and have full access to our money and all information. So he truly is for real. I hope he lives a very, very long time....selfishly.

I wish he could have taken over our 401K's instead of having us flounder with them. We would have been retired by now.
Reply
Old 02-10-2014 | 04:08 AM
  #48  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I don't itemize. I have zero deductions.





Most of what you said is true. No military retirement. All my 402k contributions from here on are ROTH. I'll believe the PBGC if I start cashing checks. Democrats cannot do math, and the physics of what they are doing will not stop because they feel bad about it. One way or another, they are coming after our retirement monies....





We'll see. On one hand, I think you are right, because these clowns won't have anywhere else to get the money from. On the other though, If I don't take it out, they won't tax me on it, and the Mrs and I really aren't big consumers. (I STILL don't have a smart phone)....

The discussion is interesting, and has got me thinking about reevalutaing my strategy...
Strategy: Non-leveraged tax deductible assets that provide income and depreciation for a long time...They make your taxable income smaller, but more than pay for themselves (the best are the ones that pay for themselves in depreciation (appraisal or leveraged value) alone)...car washes, rentals, store fronts, farms, office space, Laundromats, trailer parks, etc.

Outright ownership is the way to go with these. There is work involved, but the tax savings/income potential is great. DYODD.

In several years, I think the gold bugs will have been proven right also.

Bottom line, staying liquid can put your assets in Pelosi's hand.
Reply
Old 02-10-2014 | 05:28 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Yeah but you'd get that "extra" $1500 regardless of chosing to allocate it to your 401 or just taking the cash, right? The way I read your original post it implied that only if you sent it to your 401 would you get the additional contribution.
No, all I said was that the PS check is pensionable income as defined in the PWA. So you get 15% more but that 15% is put in the 401k regardless of your 401k election for the PS check. Sorry for the confusion.
Reply
Old 02-10-2014 | 08:53 AM
  #50  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Strategy: Non-leveraged tax deductible assets that provide income and depreciation for a long time...They make your taxable income smaller, but more than pay for themselves (the best are the ones that pay for themselves in depreciation (appraisal or leveraged value) alone)...car washes, rentals, store fronts, farms, office space, Laundromats, trailer parks, etc.

Outright ownership is the way to go with these. There is work involved, but the tax savings/income potential is great. DYODD.

In several years, I think the gold bugs will have been proven right also.

Bottom line, staying liquid can put your assets in Pelosi's hand.
Yeah what I REALLY want to do is set up a self directed IRA and buy real estate. Then since it is in a ROTH, ALL the profit and cap gains are tax free. The only bank I can find at the moment to do it is Utah Bank. There are some companies (NuView IRA) that will do it, but the cost seems a little expensive for a mere paperwork shuffler, and there is something else about them that just doesn't seem copacetic . I can do all that myself anyway... (it's just gubbamint paperwork) Any of ya'll know other banks that will do self directed IRAs?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 08:56 AM
SkyHigh
Major
0
12-16-2005 05:28 AM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-19-2005 07:37 PM
Sir James
Major
0
10-16-2005 09:14 AM
Flea Bite
Major
2
06-08-2005 04:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices