117 FDP 2 hr Extension at UAL, DAL, AA etc...
#22
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
I also don't see how a company can force someone to call fatigued. No company has the power or the authority to do that. They can't make you call in sick either. They have zero power in that regard. None whatsoever. If you just kept saying, on a recorded line, every time they asked "so you are calling in fatigued then?" the same response of "I am unwilling to extend past my normal FAR 117 maximum duty day at this time, you can direct any further inquiry to the Federal Aviation Administration, and if there is any additional issue I will be contacting them immediately" there wouldn't be jack squat they could do about it and if they tried they would be a world of hurt by the FAA. Empty threat.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Port Bus
This new law just came out, and company's are trying to tweak it in there favor. Complete BS. The law states that the PIC must agree to the extension. Where is the PIC's authority? Also, I could only hope the PIC would make a joint decision with the SIC to determine if the flight can depart safely.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
Once again sick calls are the only thing that can trigger a dependability review. Fatigue and duty extensions currently do not. Let's keep it that way and vote in a CBA.
Last edited by Climbto450; 02-18-2014 at 02:37 PM. Reason: Can't spell
#28
Douch bags like this are the reason we have the new sick policy ,,,, guys have ruined a good sick policy ( non existent ) and made is suffer cause they call out 30 times a year. ...,,,
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 34
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Now I realize where this info came from. Cut and pasted right from BluePilots. He was called in for dependability because he punched out 9 times since December 1st not because he refused extension. Once again a little bit of information can be spun into all kinds of rumors. Once the whole picture is unveiled the picture becomes very clear. Pilots like this one are the reason JB management came out with the poorly rolled outdependability policy.
Once again sick calls are the only thing that can trigger a dependability review. Fatigue and duty extensions currently do not. Let's keep it that way and vote in a CBA.
Once again sick calls are the only thing that can trigger a dependability review. Fatigue and duty extensions currently do not. Let's keep it that way and vote in a CBA.
Huh just half the story on bluepilots, I wish I could say I'm shocked.
They are all upset about this and if it is pilot pushing that's one thing but I have a feeling there is way more to the story.
I just wish they could learn running around spreading rumors makes them look bad. We are at a time where we need FACTS not hyperbolae. O well back to the rumors.
#30
Also, when we sign the release as a pilot (all pilots sign it now for those not at DL) we are agreeing to the 2 hour extension until we notify otherwise. You can refuse the extension at any time.
We're grown adults, individuals, and professional pilots... why make a deal about the captain accepting it and us not? If you're done, you're done. Who cares if he's fine- he might have slept wonderfully while you were dealing with family issues. That's how it goes. Don't make a big emotional deal about it, and they have no room to do the same.
I had a tracker give me a deal about throwing down a pumpkin time when I felt our eastbound afternoon westcoast flight would become a redeye due to our rolling delay. He asked me if I reported not ready to fulfill my contract. I asked him "If something in the contract was legal, is it automatically safe?" He said yes. I told him that we could no longer have a productive discussion and to hand me over to the supervisor or duty pilot. Backpedalling ensued and the situation was resolved very quickly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



