Majors at a Glance
#33
Sulkair- thanks for the work. I recommend you remove the 1000 hours from the FO pay assumption. Guarantees vary and (the ones I checked) are 10-15% below 1000 making the total you posted misleading.
#34
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
#35
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
I like using the 1000 hours a year for a benchmark. For a couple reasons. A.) It doesn't seem unusual to me for a pilot to credit an average 83.33 hours. B.) Using 1000 per year allows for the hourly dollar amount to directly reflect the annual income. Very easy for making direct comparisons. And my intention with these charts is not to give someone an idea of what they can make their first year, but what they can expect to make over 12 years. Eventually I want to build a chart that can show you what you'll make if you upgrade at year 5 at Spirit vs Year 10 at Southwest - that sort of thing.
What I may do to address your concern is build a second chart using min guarantee as the primary data point. Do you or anyone else have any ideas of how you'd like to see it?
I do GREATLY appreciate the feedback. And hearing from you guys makes me want to keep developing this. Thank you!
Last edited by sulkair; 07-19-2014 at 10:58 PM.
#36
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Majors at a glance
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 167
From: window seat
I think a dual pay chart option is the best and most realistic for planning purposes.
Very, very few airline pilots only make min monthly guarantee and not a penny more, for an entire year. Let alone year after year. Its almost impossible, and when it does happen (for a year or more) its almost always by choice. The 1000 pay hours a year WAG is fairly accurate in more cases than its not. Usually far more accurate than min guar only.
Very, very few airline pilots only make min monthly guarantee and not a penny more, for an entire year. Let alone year after year. Its almost impossible, and when it does happen (for a year or more) its almost always by choice. The 1000 pay hours a year WAG is fairly accurate in more cases than its not. Usually far more accurate than min guar only.
#38
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
I think a dual pay chart option is the best and most realistic for planning purposes.
Very, very few airline pilots only make min monthly guarantee and not a penny more, for an entire year. Let alone year after year. Its almost impossible, and when it does happen (for a year or more) its almost always by choice. The 1000 pay hours a year WAG is fairly accurate in more cases than its not. Usually far more accurate than min guar only.
Very, very few airline pilots only make min monthly guarantee and not a penny more, for an entire year. Let alone year after year. Its almost impossible, and when it does happen (for a year or more) its almost always by choice. The 1000 pay hours a year WAG is fairly accurate in more cases than its not. Usually far more accurate than min guar only.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Underemployed!
Fly, actually I think you're right. I constructed a similar chart but using min reserve guarantee as the basis. Thanks for prompting me to make the change. I'm going to leave the 1000 one up as well - for now.
Majors at a glance
Majors at a glance
I agree with you, a table factoring in projected upgrade would be a very nice analysis. I appreciate the work you are doing!
#40
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Nice work. I realize everyone's rates change, but since you are wanting it as accurate as possible, Spirit's rates go up essentially $2/hr in 12 days, on August 1st, in case you want to reflect that.
I agree with you, a table factoring in projected upgrade would be a very nice analysis. I appreciate the work you are doing!
I agree with you, a table factoring in projected upgrade would be a very nice analysis. I appreciate the work you are doing!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




