Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   S.65 language (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/8795-s-65-language.html)

FoxHunter 01-23-2007 03:52 AM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 106349)
Thanks Andy, but ol' Foxhunter was talking about IF the age 60 rule changed to 65 without legislation (FAA), then already retired guys would be suing for their job back with seniority. I am aware that the courts of the US have ruled that age 60 IS NOT age discrimination. But Skygirl says it is, so it must be.:D

The courts have ruled that age 60 is not age discrimination because the FAA said that age 60 was a safety issue. If the FAA no longer holds that position any problems age 60 to 65 now becomes age discrimination.;)

lostplanetairman 01-23-2007 05:36 PM

I haven't seen any court ruling. Please provide the link.

jsled 01-27-2007 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by lostplanetairman (Post 106919)
I haven't seen any court ruling. Please provide the link.


The Age 60 Rule has also withstood the legal challenge that it constitutes age discrimination. Although the rule does mandate a chronological age for retirement, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that it does not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). In Professional Pilots Federation (PPF) v. FAA, 118 F.3d at 763 (D.C. Cir. 1997), the court held that, “nothing in the ADEA can plausibly be read to restrict the FAA from making age a criterion for employment when it acts in its capacity as the guarantor of public safety in the air…therefore, we conclude that the ADEA does not limit the authority of the FAA to prescribe a mandatory retirement age for pilots.”


Ref. http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/...81&wit_id=1941

Busboy 01-28-2007 07:43 AM


Originally Posted by jsled (Post 108945)
The Age 60 Rule has also withstood the legal challenge that it constitutes age discrimination. Although the rule does mandate a chronological age for retirement, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that it does not violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). In Professional Pilots Federation (PPF) v. FAA, 118 F.3d at 763 (D.C. Cir. 1997), the court held that, “nothing in the ADEA can plausibly be read to restrict the FAA from making age a criterion for employment when it acts in its capacity as the guarantor of public safety in the air…therefore, we conclude that the ADEA does not limit the authority of the FAA to prescribe a mandatory retirement age for pilots.”


Ref. http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/...81&wit_id=1941


Oh stop it!

Why would you try to confuse us with the facts!! It's so boring.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands