Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL hiring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2007, 08:02 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174 View Post
Unless they're on military leave, as I recall.
You are correct sir. They accept recall and immediately go on LOA.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-04-2007, 08:09 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Skygirl View Post
Yeah, what he said. Very interesting read. Maybe after reading that, a certain segment of the pilot population will settle down, stop the insults and name-calling over the age 60 rule, and learn to have a little respect for one another.
Maybe it is a good thing this rule change will take 18-24 months or more. That will be enough time to bring back the furloughees as the age 60 guys retire.

Last edited by jsled; 02-04-2007 at 08:24 AM.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-04-2007, 08:21 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by So Wonwee View Post
"Joe Marquardt, 50, left a 17-year career at Northwest Airlines last year for Emirates, as the Minnesota-based carrier phased out the DC-9 jets he flew.

He already had lost one-third of his salary in pay cuts, Marquardt said, and he faced a demotion to a smaller plane, which would mean another pay reduction.

"It got to the point where we couldn't keep the house," Marquardt said."

Seriously, 17 years at NWA and you couldn't pay off your house before then? If anyone else is in this situation, buy the Rich Dad Poor Dad book series and consult a financial advisor.
Maybe he had a few problems in his life that took a toll on his financial situation. Sick family members, maybe bad financial advice from "qualified financial advisors" or simply poor planning and/or judgement on his part.

Success in life and all those things is certainly not guaranteed.

Then again, maybe the individual in the story is simply not as smart as some claim to be.

What the story should tell you is how significantly things have changed in the industry for this to occur. There's the real news.

Perhaps you can offer something positive to this thought?
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 02-04-2007, 07:41 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by So Wonwee View Post

Seriously, 17 years at NWA and you couldn't pay off your house before then? If anyone else is in this situation, buy the Rich Dad Poor Dad book series and consult a financial advisor.
Who's to say he didn't pay off his first house. Sold it then took that money and bought a much nicer house after paying off his 15 year mortgage 2 years earlier.Open ended comments like yours show how "tunnel visioned" many are in this world.

I know a guy here at CAL who flys his A$$ off and makes 200K a year but doesn't have a damn thing because he donates almost all of his off time and his money volunteering and saving cats. I think he has 20 acres he inherited and keeps about 200 rescued cats at any given time. Why don't you explain to us how big of a loser he is.

Go count your money if that is all that matters to you.
CALPilotToo is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 06:10 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp View Post
When did NWA phase out the DC-9? I just saw one the other day. I'm sure they meant DC-10. Not that accuracy in aviation reporting means anything to the press.

Not phased out, but not replacing them with anything other than CRJ-900 and EMB 175s. About 50% less DC-9s then there were 10 years ago....slowing going away. IMHO one more sideletter where we give the company permission to put full 86 seats in the CRJ-900 (vice scoped 76 seats) and we'll be on our way to dropping all DC-9s.
reddog25 is offline  
Old 02-05-2007, 02:58 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
EugeneZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 70
Default

So is UAL a good company to fly for?
EugeneZ is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 01:20 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by FrontSeat View Post
But to answer the question it blows. part of the problem is that most of the pilots are consessionary. if managment asks for more money from them they will actually have a vote and would give up more. they are afraid and it will never change. They have a lame thing going on now called Fix it Now (FIN) road shows and meet and greets by aLPA to show what the dues are going towards. Basically aLPA is afraid of another union coming on the property and they have to show they are doing something.
I see things haven't changed with the pilots - still picking up time and trips for themselves. Also, they haven't had any alpa leadership with real backbone in quite some time.

Clearly management is in the driver's seat and will be for quite some time unless some real union leadership steps forward. Shame.

The FIN program made me laugh when I saw it.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 06:21 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

It is not as bad as Frontseat makes it out to be. He does not work here. Our big iron captains make 182 per hour, if he is making that on a gulfstream, more power to him. My United Airlines experience is this....I bid reserve on the 767. I have flown an average of 37 hours per month for the last 3 months, although I did bust my arse during the summer. We still have work rules on the 757/767/777/747. Basically no work rules on the 737/A320 other than "look back" which will give you 5 hrs per day if you turn a wheel. The wages of course are depressing. I made 169 per hour as a 5 yr 777 FO back in the day (25% more than 5 yr FEDEX widebody FOs make today)!! Now I make 101 per hour as a 10 yr 767 FO....pathetic I know....But I have 10 years invested, I can hold 737 captain (25% raise) if/when I choose to bid it, and it is still fun. So I will stick it out and hope for a better contract down the road. BTW, 24 hour layovers in Hawaii do not blow!!!

Last edited by jsled; 02-06-2007 at 06:31 AM.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:41 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by FrontSeat View Post
you are conflicting yourself with the wages..are they not bad or are they depressing

I say depressing for how much responsibility you have.

Did you vote yes for the last contract? I bet you say no. you can't find anyone who voted no on the property. Although it passed by the majority.
Not conflicting, I never said 182 per hour for a widebody captain was not bad. I just don't know many corporate jet guys making 175K per year. Good for you. The wages are depressing, especially compared to what we made before. I mean talk about a lifestyle change!! I voted yes on the contract. And I believe the HUGE savings to the company contributed greatly to the survival of UAL. Not coolaide drinking here, just being realistic. People talk as if there was some big choice to be made. Well, look at Delta. Look at NWA. They did the same thing. Bankruptcy is a *****.

Last edited by jsled; 02-06-2007 at 07:50 AM.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-12-2007, 08:40 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Coffee Bitch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
Not conflicting, I never said 182 per hour for a widebody captain was not bad. I just don't know many corporate jet guys making 175K per year. Good for you. The wages are depressing, especially compared to what we made before. I mean talk about a lifestyle change!! I voted yes on the contract. And I believe the HUGE savings to the company contributed greatly to the survival of UAL. Not coolaide drinking here, just being realistic. People talk as if there was some big choice to be made. Well, look at Delta. Look at NWA. They did the same thing. Bankruptcy is a *****.
73% of the UAL pilots voted yes to get rid of their A fund, increase their pay cuts from 33% up to 48%, sodomize the narrow body work rules (only the JR pilots of course).....WHICH BY THE COMPANY'S ESTIMATE SAVED $140M PER YEAR !!!. News Flash: United was losing $800M per quarter. Employee cost accounted for less than 17% of operating cost, (thats all employees). UAL pilots should see the UAL bancruptcy lawyer explaining "how to boil a Frog", if that doesnt P--s you off nothing will. Mis-information is what got the contract passed, and dont be fooled, employee pay cuts resulted in single digit savings at UAL.....it was just managements chance to change industry wages for ever and they had the running scared support of ALPA. Do you really think UAL would have gone under without your pay cuts???
Coffee Bitch is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
3
01-03-2007 03:46 PM
Onfinal
Major
52
12-04-2006 02:35 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
fr8rcaptain
Hiring News
5
10-03-2006 09:15 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices