Airbus Pilots - ground speed mini question
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Airbus Pilots - ground speed mini question
I've been flying the A320/321 for about 16 months and have observed groundspeed mini in action but my question is this - doesn't this impact the separation standards enacted by ATC - or more likely how can it not? If everyone else is flying indicated and my aircraft is changing indicated speed to target a groundspeed it seems this would affect time based separation standards - including those recently established as part of the new wake turbulence recat. Thoughts on this? Issues?
#3
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
#5
Separation....737-900ER with wind correction additive and you are at 160 knots consistently! So if you have a guppy on your tail it's definitely not a bad thing for GS mini to be working its magic for you.
Man I miss the bus....
Man I miss the bus....
#6
And man, I sure don't miss the 737!
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
I've been flying the A320/321 for about 16 months and have observed groundspeed mini in action but my question is this - doesn't this impact the separation standards enacted by ATC - or more likely how can it not? If everyone else is flying indicated and my aircraft is changing indicated speed to target a groundspeed it seems this would affect time based separation standards - including those recently established as part of the new wake turbulence recat. Thoughts on this? Issues?
To answer your question though, yes it would close separation assuming you and the guy you're following are at Vref/Vapp. Reasonable man theory would suggest if the wind is bad enough, they've added whatever correction already, so mini G corrections probably aren't going to close that gap. As everyone else has said, I never see anyone go managed speed until FAF or inside it.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
That's what I've been doing as well - managed at the FAF. Good thoughts guys, thank you. I've just been trying to wrap my head around the implications of it on the system as a whole - which in an Airbus probably falls into the realm of "you don't need to know that."
#9
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: CA: A321/A320/A319
Posts: 96
GS mini = Vapp - Tower Wind(Wind Entered on the Perf Page) + Real Wind (Wind Read Out From Your ND from your ADRS)
Example: Vapp is 130 and Tower Wind is 15 Knots and Real Wind is 25.
GS mini at your Altitude is 130 - 15 + 25 = Equals 140 Knots Ground Speed Mini. As you come down the Glide Slope it will change as the wind changes, unless wind is constant but rare. All designed to keep your Ground Speed Constant to avoid being behind the "curve" in case of wind gusts or wind shear.
Example: Vapp is 130 and Tower Wind is 15 Knots and Real Wind is 25.
GS mini at your Altitude is 130 - 15 + 25 = Equals 140 Knots Ground Speed Mini. As you come down the Glide Slope it will change as the wind changes, unless wind is constant but rare. All designed to keep your Ground Speed Constant to avoid being behind the "curve" in case of wind gusts or wind shear.
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Flaps setting from perf entered incorrectly
Next question - performance churns out flaps 3 takeoff. CA incorrectly enters flaps 1 on FMS perf and I incorrectly set the flaps at 1. Company procedure requires comparing what's been entered to what's been set. But what if what's been entered is incorrect. I'm comparing two errors that happen to coincidentally correlate. So I guess two wrongs do make a perceived right? Will the aircraft catch the fact we have flaps 1 but require 3? Let's make it interesting and say this is Burbank with a flex takeoff.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post