Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Lowering Level Of Safety >

Lowering Level Of Safety

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Lowering Level Of Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2016 | 12:19 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
There is a difference though in who the regional airline is. Wholly owned regionals are simply cost centers to their mainline owner.

A company like republic though must turn a profit and answer to shareholders.
So let the contracts expire bring it in house and pay the pilots right. Tell republic and the like will die and that just fine.
Reply
Old 09-02-2016 | 12:36 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: non acceptus excretus
Default

Originally Posted by Maingear
I've flown with low time military pilots in a 121 environment and let me tell you, an FO with 1000 hours who used to fly the C-5 isn't any better trained than the 1500 hour guy from flight instructing. One of the worst pilots I've flown with. I've flown with several other questionable prior-military with low hours.

That being said, the best FO I've had was an Eagle driver and was the ultimate bro and could make the plane do whatever he wanted.

Low time is low time no matter what you flew before.

Also what difference will this make? Any pilot that has hours that low will be obligated for many more years of service...
Good point! Low time is low time is low time. The only guys who want the hour limits lowered are guys with low time, and or airline bean counters who don't want to pay pilots for their work. It is a rare low time pilot who is good to fly with.
Reply
Old 09-02-2016 | 05:52 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Molon Labe
Good point! Low time is low time is low time. The only guys who want the hour limits lowered are guys with low time, and or airline bean counters who don't want to pay pilots for their work. It is a rare low time pilot who is good to fly with.
The aviation scam universities are number two behind the airlines. They want a specific carve out for an aviation degree. They already have one and now they want a bigger one.
Reply
Old 09-02-2016 | 07:55 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
You're joking right? Regional airlines work on capacity purchase agreements which means that the the legacy carriers buy every seat on the plane and resell them for whatever they choose. Those small markets are often highly profitable because they are convenient. A ticket out of south bend is probably twice as much as a ticket out of ORD. The regional airlines can't afford to pay pilots more because the legacy carriers pay very little for those seats and keep the massive profits for themselves. If the outsourcing stops or the legacy carriers decide to actually pay an appropriate fee to the regional airlines you'd have an evenvironment where profits might take a slight hit but you could pay the pilots an appropriate wage with no increase in ticket price.
Then why haven't the unions fixed the pay problem? Isn't that what they are there for?
Reply
Old 09-02-2016 | 11:31 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 356
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
People are still repeating this tired old line of propaganda from the unions? HA HA HA ...

Pay has increased in some cases quadruple. Demand has increased, and supply has diminished. There is absolutely a shortage of new pilots to feed into the sector.

You do understand there is downward price pressure on the market too, right? If regionals increase pay that means they have to charge more to the passengers. There may not be the elasticity there to allow for that.

Roger Cohen? Is that you?
Reply
Old 09-03-2016 | 01:46 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
Then why haven't the unions fixed the pay problem? Isn't that what they are there for?
the RLA is a rigged system, but when we win its gonna be UUUUGGGEEE!!!
Reply
Old 09-04-2016 | 01:56 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by akulahunter
Concur... I only did one flying tour and still left with over 1400hrs. Can't imagine the number of guys leaving with between 500-750 is more than a hand full....

Also, the burden wouldn't be insurmountable if the initial jobs pilots obtained after school paid enough to keep them off of food stamps...
For all those saying there ain't many you'd be surprised. Marine hornet and harrier guys often do just better than 100 hours a year. If they were unfortunate to have only one flying tour they'd be around 600 hours with flight school included. Two tours and they might break 900. I am not suggesting lowering the limit; but there are more than you think. I ended around 1600 hours with 14 years of service; all flying tours.
Reply
Old 09-04-2016 | 09:36 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Under beer over couch after skool
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
People are still repeating this tired old line of propaganda from the unions? HA HA HA ...

Pay has increased in some cases quadruple. Demand has increased, and supply has diminished. There is absolutely a shortage of new pilots to feed into the sector.

You do understand there is downward price pressure on the market too, right? If regionals increase pay that means they have to charge more to the passengers. There may not be the elasticity there to allow for that.

United and Delta employ what type of worker? Pilots. How many flights has United or Delta cancelled for a lack of pilots? Strange how the regionals that have the worst QOL and pay, are having a hard time attracting or retaining...Pilots.

There is effectively one talent pool with a few differences now that FOs with no TPIC are being hired at ULCCs and Legacies, consequently regionals are competing to both recruit and retain their pilots.

If the NMB didn't let regional negotiations drag on for years on end, maybe the regionals would be a slightly better place to work, people wouldn't have heard horror stories for decades and every regional wouldn't have a group of 1000+ pilots telling people to avoid Regional X. But those things didn't transpire and now the RAA and regional execs are hesitant to lock in long term costs in the form of wages, instead they choose to increase the talent pool by hiring less qualified applicants.

Regionals don't charge passengers as you know. Regionals typically exist on a FFD model with a built-in margin. Legacies need to decide to take flying in-house, or increase the reimbursement rate for their CPAs. Neither of those cost increases will make it to the consumer for a long time, and any increase is likely to be less than the price sensitivity of the consumer in my opinion.
Reply
Old 09-04-2016 | 09:57 AM
  #29  
banana380's Avatar
Standing by to Stand By
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Holding
Default

Originally Posted by andrewtac
For all those saying there ain't many you'd be surprised. Marine hornet and harrier guys often do just better than 100 hours a year. If they were unfortunate to have only one flying tour they'd be around 600 hours with flight school included. Two tours and they might break 900. I am not suggesting lowering the limit; but there are more than you think. I ended around 1600 hours with 14 years of service; all flying tours.


I echo this sentiment, Navy 60 guys are finishing their first tours with less than a thousand now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 09-04-2016 | 10:06 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,559
Likes: 1,222
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
Then why haven't the unions fixed the pay problem? Isn't that what they are there for?
Well, considering less than 10 years ago, regional airlines averaged less than $20/hour for first year first officers and made them pay for their own training while first year rates are pushing $40/hour with various other benefits, I'd say the unions have been doing alright.

It's not fixed but you can't triple your labor cost overnight. Everything has been headed in the right direction for the better part of the last 5 years with some exceptions. Of course, as an outsider who doesn't really understand the industry, I can see how that's confusing to you. You don't understand what a lack of regulations would do to the industry you are trying to enter. It may help you in the short term but I can promise you, you don't want to go back to the days when the "regionals" operated under 135 with very little work rules or regulations. Ask a lot of the old timers how those days were?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
05-23-2012 07:37 AM
Jesse
Foreign
2
12-07-2011 02:54 PM
MD80
Major
1
12-04-2009 08:04 AM
normajean21
Flight Schools and Training
30
10-25-2008 09:06 PM
AUS_ATC
Hangar Talk
0
03-08-2006 06:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices