Let's park all the aircraft, green energy fast trains are the solution to AGW.

I'm not saying we should eliminate coal or every carbon-based energy consumer or producer. That's illogical right now. I think we should do what we can to reduce, through creating clean and efficient burning technologies and substitute where applicable. We need to acknowledge that we are having a negative impact on our environment and ecosystem (we as in humans, not Americans) and make a legitimate effort to significantly cut dirty carbon emissions.

It doesn't work that way, the issue is that with the politics of AGW, you don't get to dictate terms, international treaties do. Global interests will pick winners, and losers.

Not believing in global warming is just plain ridiculous. It's obvious you are following your political party's lead.

Fact: 97.4% of scientists believe in GW and that humans are the cause or accelerating the process. (Yet somehow armchair republicans know better?)

Fact: what was 250 parts per million in CO2 and methane pre industrial revolution, is now 400 parts per million.

When you say it is a lie or a hoax you just sound crazy or completely incapable of accepting an unemotional and logical factual analysis. You are also saying that every scientist is somehow in on some grand design to do what?


When you fart in a room it stinks and it has an adverse effect. This isnt rocket surgery

:rolleyes:

Yeah. Right. OK.

...and Trump is never going to be the President, either. You can keep your doctor if you like your doctor. ISIS is a JV team. There is a red line in Syria. Experience doesn't matter. Babies in the womb aren't babies. Etc. Etc. Etc.

Ho hum.

Don't you people ever get tired of your lies being proven wrong time after time after time?

Fortunately, the American people are tired of them. It's why your ilk has been returned to the political fringe where it came from and you now only control the governor's mansion and legislatures in just 4 states (2 more must cast tie-breaking votes).

Abe Lincoln said it best...

"You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time."

Enjoy regulating cow farts in La La Land.


https://cbdakota.files.wordpress.com...500_130923.jpg

Not to worry, when the Big Blue Marble tires of us, it will shake us off like so many fleas.

Wait, so you are correlating people not believing Trump could be President to Anthropogenic Global Warming? That makes no logical sense. This isn't a "liberal" cause. This is a human cause. Almost every single country on acknowledges it as an imminent threat. There only people who don't are Republicans because they are owned by Big Business special interests and North Korea. You don't get to vote for Global Warning. This isn't some subjective saber rattling or bluff like a line in the sand. You've provided zero proof(I.e science) to it being a hoax. You can post all the ignorant cartoons you want. By making a connection between Trump getting elected and global warming, you are showing how incredibly misinformed you are. This isn't zero sum. Just because Republicans won this election doesn't mean science is now magically wrong and liberalism is dead. Senate Democrats actually gained two seats. I don't know why you keep harping on abortion rights. It has absolutely no relevancy to what we are talking about.

Don't worry, kiddo. It's possible (not to be confused with probable) that at least one of you wackos' predictions will come true. Someday.

Meantime, you've got cow farts to stop. Better hurry or we're all gonna die.

This quote alone negates you're credibility and ability to have a cogent debate. 'North Korea'? That is a first! By the way, where are all the killer hurricanes hitting the East Coast? It has been a very slow decade for hurricanes contrary to the predictions of Al Gore and his ilk.

You better do a little more research on your "facts."
The study reporting the 97% consensus “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature” by John Cook, and friends under the halo of the University of Queensland was published in 2013 and according to Watts Up With That when the source data for the study was published on line the University of Queensland got so worried, they threatened a lawsuit over use of Cook’s ’97% consensus’ data for a scientific rebuttal.
The way the study was conducted was Cook and his buddies looked at peer reviewed studies and classified them a either agreeing or disagreeing with the hypothesis. The 97% figure was really 97% of the studies they reviewed. However investigative journalists at Popular Technology reported the 97% Study falsely classifies scientists’ papers, according to the scientists that published them
Popular Tech. looked into precisely which papers were classified within Cook’s asserted 97 percent. The investigative journalists found Cook and his colleagues strikingly classified papers by such prominent, vigorous skeptics as Willie Soon, Craig Idso, Nicola Scafetta, Nir Shaviv, Nils-Axel Morner and Alan Carlin as supporting the 97-percent consensus.A more extensive examination of the Cook study by the New American, reported that out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That is less than 0.97%.Another criticism of the Cook and buddies paper is they didn’t define the “consensus” they were looking for. Is the 97% for people who believe the global warming is real, or people who believe its real and caused by mankind.
From the data and methodology Cook has allowed the public to see, the 97% consensus figure is totally bogus, and the fact he preventing full disclosure of his data, via University of Queensland, by threatening legal action suggests there may be more nefarious things being withheld.
The bottom line is that Senator Cruz was correct and Sierra Club president Aaron Mair was full of baloney (or at least the people sitting behind him feeding him answers). And for their baloney they get the worst rating on our global warming liar scale…four ugly Christmas sweaters (because some scientists say we are going to have a mini ice age soon and they will need to keep warm).