![]() |
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 2256623)
Just like Laker in the 80's. The legacies have some very deep pockets now.
We can only hope. |
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2256616)
Even if the LCCs like spirit are the only ones to endure after companies like Norwegian become more prevalent I wouldn't say Spirit is THE place to be. At these wages it's not a career worth having, it's a job. I'm at spirit and if pay like this is the future I'm out. Hope to see you in FLL tomorrow at the picket unless that is you'll have you nose so far up Jyri's ass telling him this is the place to be. It's not!
I don't work for Spirit, but I wish you gentlemen luck. I'm at a regional, and Im still deciding what the best way to play this is. |
Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta
(Post 2256620)
The only bet I'll make on Spirit is one for a takeover. If this industry goes down the path you seem to salivating over, Spirit won't exist in a decade and you'd be foolish to think that will mean you'll be in a better place because of it.
It doesn't make me salivate, it makes me nauseous. |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 2256542)
Don't be so comfortable. Best thing for Spirit pilots is for Legacy carriers to have a vested interest in international travel. Last thing Spirit pilots want are Legacy carriers intensely refocusing on the domestic side
Ask the rust belt how patriotic steel customers were once you could import steel cheaper than buying US made. Now imagine a paying customer being offered the same fare on NAI vs AA/UA/DL and imagine their cabin crew versus yours. Still get a warm fuzzy? I don't think I'll be updating my apps any more. |
Originally Posted by 50SeatsofGrey
(Post 2256629)
I don't work for Spirit, but I wish you gentlemen luck. I'm at a regional, and Im still deciding what the best way to play this is.
Start buying rental properties with the excess cash. Or a Jimmy John's franchise. This house of cards isn't about to collapse overnight, but it will likely be adversely affecting future career choices, so insulate yourself as best as you can before that happens. Guy I know from Suddern did just that; left Suddern, took a job flying in Afghanistan, made real good coin, invested in multi-family housing back home. Now he's got some 20+ doors generating monthly cashflow. When he didn't get hired at the Legacy of his choice, it didn't matter. He's flying 121 supp cargo now, but on his terms, and he's home every night. The flying "job" became nothing more than a hobby for him. |
Originally Posted by 50SeatsofGrey
(Post 2256632)
I thought only idiots make predictions in this industry?
It doesn't make me salivate, it makes me nauseous. You said I needed to make a bet so I threw my two cents in. Based on the fact you say you're still at a regional, does this mean you will not be applying to the legacies? Honest question because you seem so sure of how things will be going. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 2256618)
Not to be political but I would be very surprised if the Trump administration doesn't over turn this ruling..
I sure hope he does. He has been talking a big game, but he seems unpredictable. I think he would probably be more likely to overturn this thing than Hillary would have been. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2256635)
I agree but I think they're going to lose on international big time. US carriers suck. Period. They cannot compete against the other big international carriers on product. America is fat, lazy, and entitled. The service on US carriers (my airline included) is McDonald's dollar menu crap when compared to a wide body full of 20 something year olds that look and smell lovely and aren't 50 lbs overweight and nearing 70 years old, behave like ladies and not uncaged gorillas, and treat the customers as the reason for their job and not the self loading freight that's interrupting their Candy Crush game. I remember distinctly seeing a Cathay Pacific crew walking through the airport Hilton LAX a few years back followed by a United crew. JHC. It was like a slaughter ready pig following a Kentucky race horse. American carriers will lose to everyone else on product.
Ask the rust belt how patriotic steel customers were once you could import steel cheaper than buying US made. Now imagine a paying customer being offered the same fare on NAI vs AA/UA/DL and imagine their cabin crew versus yours. Still get a warm fuzzy? I don't think I'll be updating my apps any more. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2256635)
I agree but I think they're going to lose on international big time. US carriers suck. Period. They cannot compete against the other big international carriers on product. America is fat, lazy, and entitled. The service on US carriers (my airline included) is McDonald's dollar menu crap when compared to a wide body full of 20 something year olds that look and smell lovely and aren't 50 lbs overweight and nearing 70 years old, behave like ladies and not uncaged gorillas, and treat the customers as the reason for their job and not the self loading freight that's interrupting their Candy Crush game. I remember distinctly seeing a Cathay Pacific crew walking through the airport Hilton LAX a few years back followed by a United crew. JHC. It was like a slaughter ready pig following a Kentucky race horse. American carriers will lose to everyone else on product.
I know I'm pointing out the obvious (and you probably realize this, too) but EEOC an anti-discrimination laws have a lot to do with that. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2256635)
I agree but I think they're going to lose on international big time. US carriers suck. Period. They cannot compete against the other big international carriers on product. America is fat, lazy, and entitled. The service on US carriers (my airline included) is McDonald's dollar menu crap when compared to a wide body full of 20 something year olds that look and smell lovely and aren't 50 lbs overweight and nearing 70 years old, behave like ladies and not uncaged gorillas, and treat the customers as the reason for their job and not the self loading freight that's interrupting their Candy Crush game. I remember distinctly seeing a Cathay Pacific crew walking through the airport Hilton LAX a few years back followed by a United crew. JHC. It was like a slaughter ready pig following a Kentucky race horse. American carriers will lose to everyone else on product.
Ask the rust belt how patriotic steel customers were once you could import steel cheaper than buying US made. Now imagine a paying customer being offered the same fare on NAI vs AA/UA/DL and imagine their cabin crew versus yours. Still get a warm fuzzy? I don't think I'll be updating my apps any more. So you're definition of a good "product" is 100% about the tightness of the a%^ of the cabin crew. You mentioned it twice. Have you flown on Norwegian? I have. It's nothing special. Oh and your example of Cathay? Yeah, check their financials. Airline profits are about more than how tight the skirt is of the flight attendants. It's a big world out there, and the US Airlines operate on a macro scale. https://www.google.com/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/37103659?client=safari |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands