Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Mergers and Acquisitions (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mergers-acquisitions/)
-   -   Hey, Delta pilots. Quick question. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mergers-acquisitions/25182-hey-delta-pilots-quick-question.html)

jdt30 04-15-2008 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 364342)
here is the quick and dirty.

relative seniority would be fair for the moment but for the airline that is expecting a lot of retirements in the near future it become a disadvantage for them down the road and an advantage to the other airline.

look at the usair/america west seniority. a lot of people feel usair got the shaft because some 17 year pilots were put behind late 90's and early 2000's pilots due to relative seniority. those usair pilots could have expected rather quick movement because the average age of usair was around 53. that movement has changed due to the intergration.

this is similar to that but on a smaller scale.

So Eric if or when Cal and Ual get together how would you suggest we integrate?

dckozak 04-15-2008 07:47 AM

Pick one or the other
 
You guys can argue till the cows come home, your not going to agree who's method is fairer. Its going to be arbitrated. Get control of the situation, agree to how its arbitrated so some numb*** can't/doesn't create the fiasco that is the USAir/American West merger. I suggest you convince an Arbitrator(s) to choose one or the others list. No weeks/months long drawn out affair where some guy bills millions of dollars to write a list that everyone hates, blames ALPA, and starts a civil war. :(

Eric Stratton 04-15-2008 07:55 AM


Originally Posted by Deez340 (Post 364285)
Answer to first question: Uh.......no.

Answer to second question: I fail to see you point. The USair/AWA debacle was the the result of an arbitrator's decision. I refuse to put my future in the hands of a bureaucrat who doesn't have to live with the decision he makes for the rest of his life. In addition, comparing USAir/AWA to DelWest is apples and oranges for a host of reasons.

Who do you work for again? I see you stoke the flame fires on all sides but I'm curious whats in it for you other than entertainment.

to the Uh...no, yes you kind of did it sounds. from my take the merger needed you to change the scope to allow the nwa pilots to fly the 330/747 as someone stated. you could have said yes as long as the contract that was approved by both airlines is implamented for both but instead you said all you have to do is give us the benefits. you guys had control of that life raft and said only delta guys are allowed. you still don't have a SLI and now you don't have a joint contract. could that change...hopefully.

as with usair/aw, when that decision came out everyone that I ran into felt that usair got hosed and yes this included delta pilots that I know and have run into. this isn't apples to oranges it's more like red apples vs. green apples. some of the same issues but not all. I just find it interesting how points of view can change when someone is directly involved or not.

as for who I work for it's the airlines...what's in it for me is how it affects the industry as a whole. I don't see a potential whipsaw within your new delta as entertainment. I see it as stupidity and extreme shortsidedness.

It's nice you point out that I stroke multiple flames and not just yours;)

Eric Stratton 04-15-2008 08:05 AM


Originally Posted by DelDah Capt (Post 364313)
Eric,

This seems to be a recurring problem with you. You like to stir the pot without any real understanding of the issues. Do me, and everyone else a favor and find a copy of your Pilot's Contract (dust it off since you've apparently never read it.) Now read the section on Scope and you will find that there are all sorts of things in there that have nothing to do with RJs. We are going to have enough problems with this merger without someone who is ignorant of the issues trying to instigate dissention between the two groups with false information.

well maybe your name says it all, DelDah....priceless.

I think your pilot groups have already created dissention within yourselves you don't need me for that. by the way how is asking a question instigating dissention?

I guess you should be the one to know the scope section considering it's slowly dwindling away...:rolleyes:

Eric Stratton 04-15-2008 08:34 AM


Originally Posted by jdt30 (Post 364346)
So Eric if or when Cal and Ual get together how would you suggest we integrate?

merge so that everyone feels they got hosed. :(

if you do and it's on the board (which I'm sure it would be) I'll throw my 2 cents in.

DAL4EVER 04-15-2008 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 364368)
as for who I work for it's the airlines...what's in it for me is how it affects the industry as a whole. I don't see a potential whipsaw within your new delta as entertainment. I see it as stupidity and extreme shortsidedness.

Are you a pilot or did you just stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?

I like to know who my adversary is? I'm an ATL 757/767 FO with Delta. What and who are you?

Eric Stratton 04-15-2008 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by DAL4EVER (Post 364426)
Are you a pilot or did you just stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?

I like to know who my adversary is? I'm an ATL 757/767 FO with Delta. What and who are you?

I always loved that line.

I'm an airline pilot here in the US. I've been an FO and a CA. why would it matter who I work for or what I fly?

The problem is I am not your adversary but I will call things out that I see as bs or lopsided and I've ripped on my company as well on these boards.

sailingfun 04-15-2008 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 364188)
nwa should be upset because delta is saying we can work together as long as it is what we want. they had a joint contract agreed upon and they have now said screw nwa if they don't go with our SLI then you don't get the pay as well. delta pilots are saying that it is ok to work with a b-scale and opened themselve up to an internal whipsawing. what incentive does delta have to raise up the nwa side of things now? if nwa plays nice then they get cost savings from having a lowered payed pilot group and they most likely would drag it out for as long as possible. if nwa pilots get ****ed they could easily disrupt things trying to force the companies hand and now they come off as the bad guys for not helping the new airline. it's kind of a lose lose for nwa.

if people dont see how doh or relative seniority can be an advantage to either side than they are just blindly looking at it.

There was never a joint contract. There was a tentitive agreement contingent upon getting a seniority list done. No SLI and no joint contract. We did not get the SLI done so the TA on a contract was thrown out. The company only agreed to the contract based on costs savings in having the SLI list done upfront. No SLI no contract. There was not a new contract put in its place. DALPA put a side letter in place(LOA 19). It will only be in effect until a new joint contract is negotiated with the company. That process will start right away.

TNT AV8R 04-15-2008 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 364342)
relative seniority would be fair for the moment but for the airline that is expecting a lot of retirements in the near future it become a disadvantage for them down the road and an advantage to the other airline.

look at the usair/america west seniority. a lot of people feel usair got the shaft because some 17 year pilots were put behind late 90's and early 2000's pilots due to relative seniority.

Don't compare this to US Air / Amer West because it's just not the same. US Air was a sinking ship and should be glad America West came to their rescue. They can |3 ! t c h all they want but they could've easily been out of a job and starting over at the bottom of another air carrier's seniority list. Neither Delta, nor NWA, are in that position. Yes, things are tough. Yes, they are probably going to get tougher. But both companies have been solid even in these trying times. I hope we can work things out. A rising tide lifts all boats!

Good luck to us all.

rvr350 04-15-2008 03:22 PM


Originally Posted by Eric Stratton (Post 364342)
here is the quick and dirty.

relative seniority would be fair for the moment but for the airline that is expecting a lot of retirements in the near future it become a disadvantage for them down the road and an advantage to the other airline.

look at the usair/america west seniority. a lot of people feel usair got the shaft because some 17 year pilots were put behind late 90's and early 2000's pilots due to relative seniority. those usair pilots could have expected rather quick movement because the average age of usair was around 53. that movement has changed due to the intergration.

this is similar to that but on a smaller scale.

The keyword is "could"... Unless you have a signed agreement that says all NWA pilots that reaches age 60 will retire, it won't hold out in a court of law.

Also, you sound like DAL pilots are all in their 20s, and the NWA pilots are all in their 50s. Nwa has a spur of retirement (supposedly those who retire at 60) in the next 5-10 years, but after that, DAL will catch up and surpass in about 15 years from now. So any logical person will see that for an average newhire of both airline, this see-saw will balance out in the long term.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands