Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
Hey, Delta pilots.  Quick question. >

Hey, Delta pilots. Quick question.

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Hey, Delta pilots. Quick question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2008, 09:39 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default Hey, Delta pilots. Quick question.

Delta Gentlemen and Women,

I hate to interrupt the party, but maybe not today or tomorrow, but sometime within the week, could you ask your reps what both sides last position was for the SLI?

Before you ask, remember what you thought the Northwest position was and what you think Deltas position was. Remember also that all you guys wanted was a fair relative seniority integration based on where we fall on the current seniority list. You also thought that NWA wanted to staple you to the bottom and that our side was demanding date of hire.

What I'm hearing now and what I've been hearing is that is not what your MEC was pushing.

So, what if your side was pushing for someone at 50% on the NWA list to fall to somewhere like 60% on the combined list? As in an '88 hire being junior to a '97 or '98 hire. Would that have been ok with you and what would you have expected our MEC to do?

All I'm asking you to do is find out. Thanks.

Respectfully,

New K Now
newKnow is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 09:46 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
Delta Gentlemen and Women,

I hate to interrupt the party, but maybe not today or tomorrow, but sometime within the week, could you ask your reps what both sides last position was for the SLI?

Before you ask, remember what you thought the Northwest position was and what you think Deltas position was. Remember also that all you guys wanted was a fair relative seniority integration based on where we fall on the current seniority list. You also thought that NWA wanted to staple you to the bottom and that our side was demanding date of hire.

What I'm hearing now and what I've been hearing is that is not what your MEC was pushing.

So, what if your side was pushing for someone at 50% on the NWA list to fall to somewhere like 60% on the combined list? As in an '88 hire being junior to a '97 or '98 hire. Would that have been ok with you and what would you have expected our MEC to do?

All I'm asking you to do is find out. Thanks.

Respectfully,

New K Now
Will do. The last time I inquired about this the answer was DALPA's last position had everyone with .5% of their pre merger seniority and negotiators were perplexed as to the opposition.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 02:10 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Delta's last position had every pilot's relative seniority within 1/2% of their present relative seniority. That wasn't good enough, I guesss.
CVG767A is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 02:25 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

BTW, there's a lot of talk about NWA guys getting thrown under the bus. You guys need to consider the possibility that you were thrown under the bus by the senior guys within your own MEC (again). Those are the guys for whom relative seniority apparently wasn't good enough. I look forward to getting a look at what their last table position was. If you consider it unreasonable, you need to recall them.
CVG767A is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:13 AM
  #5  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Delta's position is well known. Straight down the line relative seniority.
Everybody kept their position on a percentage basis. The guy at 50% on the NWA list would be at 50% on the combined list.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:36 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Delta position was in print from the MEC chairman and posted here. It was a relative seniority position list. The opener not the final list had every pilot with 1/2 percent of his pre merger seniority. There were two extremes most rational people would have considered for openers. A ratio and DOH. Delta went with the ratio. NWA went with something from another universe. This is the rumor and my rep told me it was very close to factual. The first 1000 slots for NWA. 30 Delta pilots integrated by ratio into the next 1000 slots. A ratio after that with almost 2000 Delta pilots ending up on the bottom. I noticed in the NWA chairmans letter he made no attempt to explain his ratio system. The DALPA chairman did. Perhaps he did not want to address it because he knows he could not defend it.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:37 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 744B
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential View Post
Delta's position is well known. Straight down the line relative seniority.
Everybody kept their position on a percentage basis. The guy at 50% on the NWA list would be at 50% on the combined list.

Which is a non starter, just as date of hire would be a non starter for DAL. With the huge number of NWA pilot nearing retirement, relative seniority is a windfall to DAL pilots and harms NWA pilots. This is true whether they retire at 60 or 65.

Is arbitration now acceptable for DALALPA?
NwaBusDriver is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:59 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by NwaBusDriver View Post
Which is a non starter, just as date of hire would be a non starter for DAL. With the huge number of NWA pilot nearing retirement, relative seniority is a windfall to DAL pilots and harms NWA pilots. This is true whether they retire at 60 or 65.

Is arbitration now acceptable for DALALPA?
How exactly is/was relative seniority a windfall for dal? DOH would actually benefit me personally but I didn't think it was fair so I supported DALPA's position. Going to arbitration is lazy and is an abrogation of leadership. We can still get together and all benefit from the new carrier's strength. There is still time to get a joint contract and SLI before the deal is done. Your MEC seems to want to continue down its destructive path however. Get in the life boat and stop arranging the deck chairs.

Last edited by Deez340; 04-15-2008 at 06:25 AM.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 04:18 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by NwaBusDriver View Post
Which is a non starter, just as date of hire would be a non starter for DAL. With the huge number of NWA pilot nearing retirement, relative seniority is a windfall to DAL pilots and harms NWA pilots. This is true whether they retire at 60 or 65.

Is arbitration now acceptable for DALALPA?
So what are you complaining about? Theoretically, you are going to get credit for these retirements in arbitration, right? We are going down the path you wanted: the triggering of ALPA merger policy. You guys will sabotage the negotiations until arbitration is a must, and then a fair list will be decided by an arbitrator. Will you be willing to live with that list, or pull a USAir and sidestep that as well?
BlaineFaban is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 04:21 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Deez340 View Post
How exactly is/was relative seniority a windfall for dal? DOH would actually benefit me personally but I didn't think it was fair so I supported DALPA's position. Going to arbitration lazy and is an abrogation of leadership. We can still get together and all benefit from the new carrier's strength. There is still time to get a joint contract and SLI before the deal is done. Your MEC seems to want to continue down its destructive path however. Get in the life boat and stop arranging the deck chairs.
didn't you guys just push the nwa pilots out of the life boat considering you both had agreed upon a "joint" contract but because nwa didn't bend over for what "you" thought was fair in SLI you pushed them out and said start treading water...

I'm curious how delta felt about the usair/americawest seniority list?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Past V1
Mergers and Acquisitions
92
04-03-2008 12:19 PM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
14
04-03-2008 06:56 AM
Roberto
Mergers and Acquisitions
3
03-21-2008 05:32 PM
RockBottom
Major
58
02-27-2006 06:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices