Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

CAL says NO to merger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2008, 12:24 PM
  #21  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8 View Post
Could you have Larry call Doug at NWA...please!!!
I was thinking the same thing. NWA and CAL would be a good match in my opinion. DAL/NWA may be so big that the justice dept. might force divestitures of some sort. NWA/CAL would still be smaller than AMR. The route structures of NWA/CAL don't overlap, and they are two well run companies with good cash balances.

I would hope that Larry is calling Doug at the very least, or vice versa.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:04 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,919
Default

Good sound decision made by the higher ups at CAL.

Come on! A healthy CAL merging with an ailing UAL??? You might as well send a healthy man into a room with malaria infected mosquitoes.
captjns is online now  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:34 PM
  #23  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
I don't want to hear you guys complaining about how low fares are!!

If you are against mergers, you are a hypocrit. The primary advantage these mergers offer is pricing power. Something that is non-existant in this cut throat industry.

If we continue to have 6 legacy carriers, and countless national/lcc carriers, there is no pricing power. Airlines will continue to cut flights, park aircraft, lay off pilots, go bankrupt, and go belly up as they continue to price themselves out of business. Mergers were the one bright spot about this recent severe industry downturn, and CAL is not jumping on the band wagon. That's too bad!
You've got to be kidding right? Hmmmm, let's see. We're losing money, so if we get bigger, we can lose MORE $$$. That makes sense!!! BTW, who do you fly for that you're so happy about mergers?
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:43 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
StraightShooter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Chief Pilots Office
Posts: 99
Default

I'm glad that Continental will be a stand alone carrier. Good for them. And good for the industry.

Continental, Southwest & JetBlue are the three carriers in America that strive to treat employee's like customers. I hope their corporate cultures aren't diluted by the dismal cultures of United/Delta/Northwest.

UAL/DAL/NWA (especially NWA) have a bunch of ****ed off employee's who give passengers a sorry experience of flying on their airline.

Continental seems to have a greater synergy about themselves that United surely does not have.
StraightShooter is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:01 PM
  #25  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
I just heard on the news that American and Continental are now in talks after CA decided to not merge with UAL.

Looks like CA is still looking to merge.

Any updates?

-Fatty
Fatty,

Think this will answer your question.......

April 28, 2008

By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and MICHELINE MAYNARD

Continental Airlines said Sunday that it had abandoned merger talks with United Airlines and was planning to remain an independent carrier, a blow to lengthy efforts by United to find a merger partner.

Continental’s decision, announced by the airline Sunday afternoon, will change the complex game of musical chairs that the airline industry is playing after the merger announcement last week by Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines.

Continental’s move was a stunning development for United’s parent, UAL, which had been negotiating in expectation of reaching a deal by late this week. As recently as Friday, it looked as though Continental, based in Houston, and United, based outside Chicago, were on the way to reaching a merger agreement.

Continental decided to drop the talks after UAL announced worse-than-expected earnings, sending shares falling last week. On Tuesday, United said it lost $357 million in the first quarter, on higher costs for jet fuel. The airline, which spent more than three years under bankruptcy protection earlier this decade, said it would cut flights and eliminate a further 1,000 jobs.

Directors at Continental, who met Sunday afternoon, feared that a merger with United could put their company in peril. Continental, which had been expected to take management responsibilities in a deal with United, survived two bankruptcy filings of its own in the 1980s and 1990s, and has been considered one of the industry’s best-run carriers.

With the United-Continental deal scrapped, a new set of pairings is likely to take place. UAL is expected to push aggressively to reach a deal with US Airways, with which it had also been discussing a merger, people involved in the talks said. UAL had no immediate comment.

Meanwhile, Continental is expected to press ahead with preliminary talks to create a three-way alliance — short of a full merger — with American Airlines and British Airways.

In a letter to Continental employees, Lawrence W. Kellner, the airline’s chief executive, and Jeffery A. Smisek, its president, wrote: “The board very carefully considered all the risks and benefits of a merger with another airline, and determined that the risks of a merger at this time outweigh the potential rewards, as compared to Continental’s prospects on a stand-alone basis.”

They said they worried a deal would put company’s operational and financial strengths “at risk.” They also hinted at forming a new alliance, saying, “We are considering alternatives to SkyTeam” — an alliance with Delta and Northwest — “as we carefully evaluate which major global alliance will be best for Continental over the long term.”

The executives did not mention American or British Airways.

The two sides had agreed on several issues in their talks. Mr. Kellner would have run the combined company, while United’s chief executive, Glenn F. Tilton, would have stepped away from day-to-day operations.

Mr. Tilton had advocated strongly for industry consolidation, saying it was the only solution to help the struggling airlines become consistently profitable. US Airways’ chief executive, W. Douglas Parker, has also pushed for consolidation, making an unsuccessful hostile bid last year for Delta before it emerged from bankruptcy protection.

Mr. Kellner, in his letter, at least seemed sympathetic to the industry’s plight, telling employees, “Every U.S. carrier, including Continental, is under enormous pressure from record high fuel prices, a slowing U.S. economy and a weak dollar.”

United’s stock closed at $21.43 on Monday. That evening, Delta and Northwest announced their merger plans. On Tuesday, United’s shares closed below $14. They ended the week at $15.21, off 29 percent for the week.

On Tuesday, United’s chief financial officer, Frederic F. Brace, said repeatedly that the airline was in compliance with the covenants of its bank agreements. But, Mr. Brace added, “With the recent spike in fuel prices and the softening economy the trajectory of our covenant coverage is downward.”

Because of steps the airline was taking to cut costs, he said, “it’s really very difficult to predict whether we will have an issue or not.”

On Wednesday, after the sharp drop in its stock, United issued a statement saying that it was in compliance with the terms of deals governing its credit arrangements with banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Credit Suisse.

Analysts said the situation created doubt about United’s health, an issue that has hovered around United since it emerged from bankruptcy protection in early 2006. That concern was a reason talks between Delta and United, which took place while Delta was under bankruptcy protection earlier this decade, never gained traction.

Meanwhile, Continental’s next steps are far from clear. Although it planned to pursue discussions with American about joining its alliance with British Airways, the corporate cultures of Continental and American differ significantly. American, as the nation’s biggest airline until the Delta-Northwest deal is completed, is likely to want to dictate the terms under which the much-smaller Continental comes on board.

At the same time, Continental’s membership in the SkyTeam alliance could offer much greater reach than a deal with American and British Airways. The new Delta will be bigger than American, and other members in SkyTeam include KLM and Air France, which have a broader base than American and British Airways across Europe and the rest of the world.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:18 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cfii2007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,213
Default

Co+swa..................
cfii2007 is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:28 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WarEagle28's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 185
Default

There's an idea.. Southwest's domestic structure/CO international structure...make money...continue to expand internationally...It would be good for our life!
WarEagle28 is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:04 PM
  #28  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by cfii2007 View Post
Co+swa..................

SWA had better start thinknig aboutsomething... with the total dependence on a domestic market driven by an economy headed for recession... It ain't all good at LUV... IF it weren't for hedging, they would already be hurting... JMHO
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:05 PM
  #29  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Good sound decision made by the higher ups at CAL.

Come on! A healthy CAL merging with an ailing UAL??? You might as well send a healthy man into a room with malaria infected mosquitoes.

I'll let ya know how that works out next fall when I start flying Lagos..

Last edited by tsquare; 04-29-2008 at 04:08 AM.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:51 PM
  #30  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by StraightShooter View Post
I'm glad that Continental will be a stand alone carrier. Good for them. And good for the industry.

Continental, Southwest & JetBlue are the three carriers in America that strive to treat employee's like customers. I hope their corporate cultures aren't diluted by the dismal cultures of United/Delta/Northwest.

UAL/DAL/NWA (especially NWA) have a bunch of ****ed off employee's who give passengers a sorry experience of flying on their airline.

Continental seems to have a greater synergy about themselves that United surely does not have.

Thanks for the nice words. I think almost every CAL employee gave a big sigh of relief when this merger was called off. Personally I think the employees will work a lot harder now that they know LK didn't want to sell us down the river. I know a lot of guys don't like management, but they seemed to have looked out for us on this one.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
04-28-2008 07:08 PM
carl p
Mergers and Acquisitions
39
04-28-2008 05:34 PM
nicholasblonde
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-19-2008 08:16 PM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM
Gordon C
Major
0
05-27-2005 02:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices