Delta and Alaska
#22
Another merger announcement could be good, summer '10 hu? If big D were serious they may not be able to get another merger approved if they have pilots on the street. Maybe we can hold off on the furloughs till after summer '10. Anything that helps me keep my job closer to when the old guys have to leave is fine by me. I'm not really worried about my job after Dec. 2012, its just the next 3.5+ years that worry me.
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
DAL4EVER - That won't happen until UAL announces to the government that it will file and be tango uniform. Lufthansa will make a pitch that if cabotage is relaxed they will buy up "the toxic assets"
It must be really nice to know the future.
Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?
Prepared for enlightenment.
It must be really nice to know the future.
Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?
Prepared for enlightenment.
#24
DAL4EVER - That won't happen until UAL announces to the government that it will file and be tango uniform. Lufthansa will make a pitch that if cabotage is relaxed they will buy up "the toxic assets"
It must be really nice to know the future.
Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?
Prepared for enlightenment.
It must be really nice to know the future.
Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?
Prepared for enlightenment.
Oh and your toxic assets have an initial - GT and his crew.
#25
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Continue to hold then. I'm not a prognosticator just stating an opinion. UAL has and is burning through more cash than any other legacy carrier right now. They have horrendous employee relations and seem to be thoroughly ticking the passengers off. From a cash standpoint, UAL and LCC will be the first to declare if things don't change. I hope they don't. I've been through one BK and its horrible for all parties involved. Someone brought up when they thought cabotage would occur and I stated my opinion. An LCC failure while tragic may not have the catastrophic consequences from a legislator standpoint that a UAL one would. And again, UAL is from Obama's hometown. I seriously doubt after championing the losses of good paying jobs, the new administration would sit idly by and do nothing. A bailout may not happen. The next logical step would be a buyout by LH.
Oh and your toxic assets have an initial - GT and his crew.
Oh and your toxic assets have an initial - GT and his crew.
As for burning through the cash... Not so sure that United is that far off when it comes to the other trunk airlines. Also, I do see my fair share of passengers at 85 hours a month and can tell you that with very few exceptions most seem very content.
As for Obama stepping up to help if needed - I find that highly improbable.
I wouldn't be surprised to see something aligned with LH. It seems this has long been a goal of United's board + GT.
My apologies if I seemed snide or blunt. I just get sick of people bashing United. It seems to be a theme on these board.
Frats
#26
Nice answer. I agree that GT could be considered toxic.
As for burning through the cash... Not so sure that United is that far off when it comes to the other trunk airlines. Also, I do see my fair share of passengers at 85 hours a month and can tell you that with very few exceptions most seem very content.
As for Obama stepping up to help if needed - I find that highly improbable.
I wouldn't be surprised to see something aligned with LH. It seems this has long been a goal of United's board + GT.
My apologies if I seemed snide or blunt. I just get sick of people bashing United. It seems to be a theme on these board.
Frats
As for burning through the cash... Not so sure that United is that far off when it comes to the other trunk airlines. Also, I do see my fair share of passengers at 85 hours a month and can tell you that with very few exceptions most seem very content.
As for Obama stepping up to help if needed - I find that highly improbable.
I wouldn't be surprised to see something aligned with LH. It seems this has long been a goal of United's board + GT.
My apologies if I seemed snide or blunt. I just get sick of people bashing United. It seems to be a theme on these board.
Frats
#27
#29
Inventory survival kit ..
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post