Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Delta and Alaska

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 01:24 PM
  #21  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
My wife does. She looks great in the hat as well!
My wife went as one for Halloween. She likes it too. I still think it is the best uniform out there.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 02:56 PM
  #22  
Never fly
 
chuck h's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 330B
Posts: 163
Default

Another merger announcement could be good, summer '10 hu? If big D were serious they may not be able to get another merger approved if they have pilots on the street. Maybe we can hold off on the furloughs till after summer '10. Anything that helps me keep my job closer to when the old guys have to leave is fine by me. I'm not really worried about my job after Dec. 2012, its just the next 3.5+ years that worry me.
chuck h is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 04:30 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

DAL4EVER - That won't happen until UAL announces to the government that it will file and be tango uniform. Lufthansa will make a pitch that if cabotage is relaxed they will buy up "the toxic assets"

It must be really nice to know the future.

Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?

Prepared for enlightenment.
skypest is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 04:45 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by skypest View Post
DAL4EVER - That won't happen until UAL announces to the government that it will file and be tango uniform. Lufthansa will make a pitch that if cabotage is relaxed they will buy up "the toxic assets"

It must be really nice to know the future.

Perhaps I am out of touch with reality. Please explain exactly why you see United having to file for BK. Have United's results for the last several quarters been that far out of line with the other legacy carrier's? Maybe it is the "toxic assets" that will bring them down. Can you describe those assest in detail?

Prepared for enlightenment.
Continue to hold then. I'm not a prognosticator just stating an opinion. UAL has and is burning through more cash than any other legacy carrier right now. They have horrendous employee relations and seem to be thoroughly ticking the passengers off. From a cash standpoint, UAL and LCC will be the first to declare if things don't change. I hope they don't. I've been through one BK and its horrible for all parties involved. Someone brought up when they thought cabotage would occur and I stated my opinion. An LCC failure while tragic may not have the catastrophic consequences from a legislator standpoint that a UAL one would. And again, UAL is from Obama's hometown. I seriously doubt after championing the losses of good paying jobs, the new administration would sit idly by and do nothing. A bailout may not happen. The next logical step would be a buyout by LH.

Oh and your toxic assets have an initial - GT and his crew.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 07:27 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER View Post
Continue to hold then. I'm not a prognosticator just stating an opinion. UAL has and is burning through more cash than any other legacy carrier right now. They have horrendous employee relations and seem to be thoroughly ticking the passengers off. From a cash standpoint, UAL and LCC will be the first to declare if things don't change. I hope they don't. I've been through one BK and its horrible for all parties involved. Someone brought up when they thought cabotage would occur and I stated my opinion. An LCC failure while tragic may not have the catastrophic consequences from a legislator standpoint that a UAL one would. And again, UAL is from Obama's hometown. I seriously doubt after championing the losses of good paying jobs, the new administration would sit idly by and do nothing. A bailout may not happen. The next logical step would be a buyout by LH.

Oh and your toxic assets have an initial - GT and his crew.
Nice answer. I agree that GT could be considered toxic.

As for burning through the cash... Not so sure that United is that far off when it comes to the other trunk airlines. Also, I do see my fair share of passengers at 85 hours a month and can tell you that with very few exceptions most seem very content.

As for Obama stepping up to help if needed - I find that highly improbable.

I wouldn't be surprised to see something aligned with LH. It seems this has long been a goal of United's board + GT.

My apologies if I seemed snide or blunt. I just get sick of people bashing United. It seems to be a theme on these board.

Frats
skypest is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 07:52 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by skypest View Post
Nice answer. I agree that GT could be considered toxic.

As for burning through the cash... Not so sure that United is that far off when it comes to the other trunk airlines. Also, I do see my fair share of passengers at 85 hours a month and can tell you that with very few exceptions most seem very content.

As for Obama stepping up to help if needed - I find that highly improbable.

I wouldn't be surprised to see something aligned with LH. It seems this has long been a goal of United's board + GT.

My apologies if I seemed snide or blunt. I just get sick of people bashing United. It seems to be a theme on these board.

Frats
No sweat. I have numerous friends at UAL and the majority of them are going into their second furlough. My frustration, shared more passionately by UAL employees, is the complete and utter failure of the Board at UAL to demand that Tilton and crew run the company. It seems that Tilton felt that gutting employee contracts during BK was the cure-all. Not tackling the mountain of debt they had incurred. They didn't use BK to constructively try and figure out what routes worked and what didn't. (At DAL, we are blessed with Hauenstein and Cortelyou who completely revamped our network.) Finally, I believe Tilton's sole hope was to lean the company out for hopes of a merger and he could cash out. When that never materialized you see the ship drifting with no rudder. UAL arguably had the best network and brand recognition of any U.S. carrier yet management completely urinated it away. I wish you all luck there.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:25 PM
  #27  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
I see DAL achieving this. I also know that there is a lot of backwater working being done with this. You will see things start to take shape this time next year.
I think the widget will look better on their tail than that picture of Moammar Khadaffi.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:25 PM
  #28  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I think the widget will look better on their tail than that picture of Moammar Khadaffi.

Carl
Now that is a good one. I had a good laugh at that one! Keep em coming
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:35 PM
  #29  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I think the widget will look better on their tail than that picture of Moammar Khadaffi.

Carl
I think you have been around long enough to know that its Frank Lorenzo's mother on the tail, not Khadaffi.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:37 PM
  #30  
Never fly
 
chuck h's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 330B
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I think the widget will look better on their tail than that picture of Moammar Khadaffi.

Carl
I thought it was Bob Marley.
chuck h is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Green Banana
Major
109
12-01-2010 09:32 AM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 05:44 PM
wiggy
Mergers and Acquisitions
229
12-08-2008 10:50 AM
vagabond
Major
0
12-04-2008 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices