Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Mesa Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mesa-airlines/)
-   -   Dear Union Leadership. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mesa-airlines/129942-dear-union-leadership.html)

kevin18 06-08-2020 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by NovemberBravo (Post 3072226)
Compare our pay rates to everyone else’s why do we need to be further below every other airline. JO needs to use the money he was trying to spend on another airline.

We’re on a contract. All of those rates that you’re seeing are from the last two years. Remember, joe flaco was the highest paid quarterback for a period. . .

pangolin 06-09-2020 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3072151)
It’s not straight forward because of relative base seniority but my rough math puts it at about 640 seniority number as the bottom ca with a 20 pct shrink. We lose more ejet than crj captains because ejet is more Jr. May force some ca displacement to the ejet side. It’s a mess no matter what and this number is sheer fantasy. We know nothing. The public stance is stated in the investor call. JO would rather have a reduced hour MOU than to furlough.

It looks like seniority number 700 and below would reduce us by 98 captains. 47 from IAH, 36 from DFW, 2 from IAD and 13 from SDF. Likely would cause base closing at SDF or jr assignments to that base. Possibly some reassignment to IAH for CRJ guys but that would be expensive for the company. I don't know if downgrades have to work globally or if they can do it by base. The contract 23-J-4 does mention out of seniority downgrades. 16-A says the seniority list is primary unless otherwise noted. 23-D-4 covers voluntary displacements - hence why you have a voluntary option in your standing bid. You can bid to be voluntarily displaced to FO. After the voluntary displacements - then the displacements occur in reverse seniority order. So if a displacement bid is announced your standing bid is paramount. This is all premature but a good research exercise. We have no idea about furloughs or displacements and the "rumor" of 100 CA displacements is just that - an unsubstantiated rumor.

propellere 06-09-2020 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3072539)
It looks like seniority number 700 and below would reduce us by 98 captains. 47 from IAH, 36 from DFW, 2 from IAD and 13 from SDF. Likely would cause base closing at SDF or jr assignments to that base. Possibly some reassignment to IAH for CRJ guys but that would be expensive for the company. I don't know if downgrades have to work globally or if they can do it by base. The contract 23-J-4 does mention out of seniority downgrades. 16-A says the seniority list is primary unless otherwise noted. 23-D-4 covers voluntary displacements - hence why you have a voluntary option in your standing bid. You can bid to be voluntarily displaced to FO. After the voluntary displacements - then the displacements occur in reverse seniority order. So if a displacement bid is announced your standing bid is paramount. This is all premature but a good research exercise. We have no idea about furloughs or displacements and the "rumor" of 100 CA displacements is just that - an unsubstantiated rumor.

Few hours and everyone will know.

pangolin 06-09-2020 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by propellere (Post 3072557)
Few hours and everyone will know.

I doubt it. I don't think this is any sort of staffing announcement.

mjpilot 06-09-2020 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3072656)
I doubt it. I don't think this is any sort of staffing announcement.

Yep, he never mentioned anything about downgrades. I'm sure someone asked that question, but it got simply ignored.

pangolin 06-10-2020 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by mjpilot (Post 3072856)
Yep, he never mentioned anything about downgrades. I'm sure someone asked that question, but it got simply ignored.

He did mention a staffing “problem” if demand doesn’t pick up. Downgrades could save payroll money without furloughs.

550 news was encouraging but seems to indicate GoJet is done. We could have an ORD or EWR base eventually.

I guess in a post covid world the drink/snack station is a non starter in the 550. So there’s the 550 lite. At any rate that was the brightest spot for pilots.

Not that we will be asked but I’m a hard no on a reduced credit MOU if downgrades are on the table.

normalperson 06-10-2020 08:10 AM

Sorry, I know this is a dumb question and relates to scope etc but: why would United, after I thought Kirby recently indicated they wanted to get away from the 50-seaters, want to retrofit the 700’s to a 50 seat config? Why not just continue to operate as configured?

mjpilot 06-10-2020 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by pangolin (Post 3073155)
He did mention a staffing “problem” if demand doesn’t pick up. Downgrades could save payroll money without furloughs.

550 news was encouraging but seems to indicate GoJet is done. We could have an ORD or EWR base eventually.

I guess in a post covid world the drink/snack station is a non starter in the 550. So there’s the 550 lite. At any rate that was the brightest spot for pilots.

Not that we will be asked but I’m a hard no on a reduced credit MOU if downgrades are on the table.

Downgrades would save money as soon as the downgrades happen, which would be before October.

That's why Express Jet, Air Wisconsin, and others have started downgrade bids.

Clearly, we ARE highly overstaffed on both fleet types.

For me, listening to this call was just a waste of time, since I basically knew most of that information already by observing the whole industry.

terks43 06-10-2020 09:06 AM


Originally Posted by mjpilot (Post 3073208)
Downgrades would save money as soon as the downgrades happen, which would be before October.

That's why Express Jet, Air Wisconsin, and others have started downgrade bids.

Clearly, we ARE highly overstaffed on both fleet types.

For me, listening to this call was just a waste of time, since I basically knew most of that information already by observing the whole industry.

Don’t believe downgrades before October would comply with the CARES act. Specifically the “no changes in pay rate” part. That is beyond a shadow of a doubt a change in pay rate. Unless of course the federal government chooses not to hold large companies accountable yet again.

Swakid8 06-10-2020 09:22 AM


Originally Posted by terks43 (Post 3073236)
Don’t believe downgrades before October would comply with the CARES act. Specifically the “no changes in pay rate” part. That is beyond a shadow of a doubt a change in pay rate. Unless of course the federal government chooses not to hold large companies accountable yet again.

Cares Act doesn’t protect from Downgrades, it only protects the per hour rates and from layoffs.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands