Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info >

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info


Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info

Old 01-27-2010 | 11:41 AM
  #231  
winglet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
Has the section 341 meeting been scheduled?
Not yet. The next big hearing is on February 9th. The matter of the remaining unused aircraft will be on the agenda.

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 01-27-2010 at 04:44 PM.
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 11:51 AM
  #232  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Winglet,

Can you post the actual link to the bankruptcy court with the motion to get rid of the 900 and 700.
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 01:37 PM
  #233  
PinnacleFO's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: CRJ Captain
Default

Im sorry I havent really been following because I am not one of the vulchers circling hoping to pick up flying from this mess and I really don't understand the bankruptcy process so could someone tell me
Are they just trying to get rid of all of these planes and start over or are they trying to renegotiate lower lease rates on all of these?
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 03:06 PM
  #234  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
Im sorry I havent really been following because I am not one of the vulchers circling hoping to pick up flying from this mess and I really don't understand the bankruptcy process so could someone tell me
Are they just trying to get rid of all of these planes and start over or are they trying to renegotiate lower lease rates on all of these?
A little bit of both. Some they will dump and some that they most likely intend to keep (-700s and -900s) they will try and renegotiate leases on.
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 03:27 PM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
Im sorry I havent really been following because I am not one of the vulchers circling hoping to pick up flying from this mess and I really don't understand the bankruptcy process so could someone tell me
Are they just trying to get rid of all of these planes and start over or are they trying to renegotiate lower lease rates on all of these?
I commend your vow to resign your position rather than benefit from Mesa's BK, should pinnacle expand in any way.

Do you really think any of our opinions matters one **** to the BK process or who benefits or loses from it?
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 03:43 PM
  #236  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
Im sorry I havent really been following because I am not one of the vulchers circling hoping to pick up flying from this mess and I really don't understand the bankruptcy process so could someone tell me
Are they just trying to get rid of all of these planes and start over or are they trying to renegotiate lower lease rates on all of these?
http://i1.trekearth.com/photos/766/vulture.jpg
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 04:05 PM
  #237  
winglet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default Delta/Mesa Litigation Position Letters Sent

Mesa Air Group, the Unsecured Creditor's Committe, and Delta each submitted their position letters today concerning Mesa's motion to assume the 2005 Delta contract under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mesa and the Creditors submitted a schedule to assume the Delta contract under Bankruptcy Law and have the litigation transferred from the district court (Atlanta) to the bankruptcy court (New York).

As expected, Delta's letter requests that the litigation be resolved in the district courts in Atlanta.

If the litigation is transferred from District Court to Bankruptcy Court then the Creditor's Committee, the Trustee, and the Judge will be the deciders concerning Mesa's assumtion of the contract. Unlike the District Court, they are more interested in what will make Mesa a viable company not in who wronged who first.

Regardless of which court the litigation is tried in, it appears that Mesa has succeeded in forcing the schedule and brought the issue into the forefront. Forcing this issue is probably the primary reason Mesa chose to declare bankruptcy.

There is now pressure on Delta to either settle, have Mesa assume the contract, or have a court injunction turned around, which is rare. Mesa would probably prefer a large settlement as it would provide some sorely needed cash and ease the process of returning the 50 seaters.

The Judge's views on this matter will be a deciding factor in this case if not the deciding factor.

Here we go...

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 01-27-2010 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 04:15 PM
  #238  
winglet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by InvertedLoop
Winglet,

Can you post the actual link to the bankruptcy court with the motion to get rid of the 900 and 700.
InvertedLoop,

Here is a link to the Court Dockets. See Docket # 168.

MAG doesn't want to get rid of any 700's or 900's. If you would like to read what I said about the 700's and 900's see posts #175 and #193.

winglet

Last edited by winglet; 01-27-2010 at 04:43 PM.
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 04:52 PM
  #239  
NightHawk's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: line...reserve...furlough
Default

What's the deal with the 10 700s mesa was supposed to add? Is that completely seperate from the bankruptcy? Any news?
Reply
Old 01-27-2010 | 05:07 PM
  #240  
Go Knights Go
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: OCC/Dispatch
Default

Originally Posted by winglet
Mesa Air Group, the Unsecured Creditor's Committe, and Delta each submitted their position letters today concerning Mesa's motion to assume the 2005 Delta contract under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mesa and the Creditors submitted a schedule to assume the Delta contract under Bankruptcy Law and have the litigation transferred from the district court (Atlanta) to the bankruptcy court (New York).

As expected, Delta's letter requests that the litigation be resolved in the district courts in Atlanta.

If the litigation is transferred from District Court to Bankruptcy Court then the Creditor's Committee, the Trustee, and the Judge will be the deciders concerning Mesa's assumtion of the contract. Unlike the District Court, they are more interested in what will make Mesa a viable company not in who wronged who first.

Regardless of which court the litigation is tried in, it appears that Mesa has succeeded in forcing the schedule and brought the issue into the forefront. Forcing this issue is probably the primary reason Mesa chose to declare bankruptcy.

There is now pressure on Delta to either settle, have Mesa assume the contract, or have a court injunction turned around, which is rare. Mesa would probably prefer a large settlement as it would provide some sorely needed cash and ease the process of returning the 50 seaters.

The Judge's views on this matter will be a deciding factor in this case if not the deciding factor.

Here we go...

winglet
Winglet,

First thank you for continous efforts in your very infofmational posts.

Regarding the qoute above it would be wise to remember the creditors interest is not in exclusively making Mesa viable but what would recoup there money.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
Past V1
Mesa Airlines
1
01-06-2010 09:09 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices