Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
How do majors view retiring staffers? >

How do majors view retiring staffers?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

How do majors view retiring staffers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2017, 07:50 PM
  #11  
Trying to Train
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by DoUEvenLoopBro View Post
Ok, thank you everyone for the responses. Like I said, I'm just trying to manage expectations right now so every little bit of advice helps.
I had similar questions when I started the app process. Delta recruiter told me that they look for 100 hours in the last 12 months and it does not matter what type aircraft it is in. United chief of hiring said they look for recent time in something more complex than a 172 and preferably multi-engine with a crew. However, I last flew single seat military nearly 2 years ago but flew 100 hours in a 172 in the past year. In the United App I listed how many hours I flew in the past 12 months and how many complex turbine hours I flew in the past 24 months. I have an interview with United. I didn't apply with regionals, and didn't hear back from any majors other than United.
Lurchi is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 07:29 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,251
Default

Originally Posted by Lurchi View Post
I have an interview with United. I didn't apply with regionals, and didn't hear back from any majors other than United.
Good luck with UAL Interview!

I just interviewed with them last week...should hear results this coming Wed or Thursday.
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:12 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Default

What are your opinions on 100-200 hrs. (50-100 in the last year) in a twin-engine GA aircraft ??? I have the ability to swing that between now and the time I need to submit any apps.

I'm thinking something along the lines of a Cessna 310 or 340. Really, anything with retractable gear and variable prop to give it some semblance complexity.

Thoughts??
DoUEvenLoopBro is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:24 PM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by DoUEvenLoopBro View Post
What are your opinions on 100-200 hrs. (50-100 in the last year) in a twin-engine GA aircraft ??? I have the ability to swing that between now and the time I need to submit any apps.

I'm thinking something along the lines of a Cessna 310 or 340. Really, anything with retractable gear and variable prop to give it some semblance complexity.

Thoughts??
Barely better than a 172, but a lot more expensive.

You'd better off getting a part-time 135 job, or buying a citation type and doing the on-call thing...anything professional under an operating certificate would be better than private pilot time. Especially if it burns kerosene...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:44 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 376
Default

Originally Posted by DoUEvenLoopBro View Post
What are your opinions on 100-200 hrs. (50-100 in the last year) in a twin-engine GA aircraft ??? I have the ability to swing that between now and the time I need to submit any apps.

I'm thinking something along the lines of a Cessna 310 or 340. Really, anything with retractable gear and variable prop to give it some semblance complexity.

Thoughts??
Getting Back into the Game

Read that post from Albie. If you can financially swing that much ME GA time then go for it as any flying is better than no flying but it probably won't count significantly toward an application over any other GA time. On the UAL addendum on airlineapps.com it specifically requests "commercial/military" time in the last 12 months. I take that to means flying for compensation.

Here are the rumors that I have heard for recency:
Alaska - 50 hrs last 12 months to even apply
SWA - 2 of 5 years actively flying (not sure how that is translated)
UAL - 100 hrs in last 12 months "more complex that 172"
Delta - 100 hrs in last 12 months (anything goes?)
FedEx - 200 hrs in a turbine aircraft last 12 months
Regional - 1500 total hours and a pulse.

These are all unofficial hiring mins but there are examples (except DAL) of pilots getting hired without meeting them.

FWIW - I bought a small GA aircraft that is "more complex than a 172" and the operating cost is double what I originally estimated. My fuel bills are on par but all the extras like tools, oil, landing fees, paper towels, cleaning supplies, spare spark plugs etc etc and then add unexpected maintenance (radio failed etc) and then having to plan for ADS-B out ($5000)...just boggles the mind.
FlewNavy is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 09:20 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 156
Default

UPS: Not a player if your not currently flying corporate, mil, res, guard, 121, 135. No staff guys hired that I've heard. Must be current
WhenPigsFLy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PinnacleFO
Hiring News
34
10-05-2011 09:01 PM
Opposing View
Cargo
167
03-03-2011 05:39 PM
majortom546
Military
40
07-09-2009 06:41 PM
USMCFDX
Cargo
10
03-19-2009 03:35 PM
ChrisH
Regional
8
11-15-2005 06:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices