Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Military (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/military/)
-   -   USAF tackles pilot shortage: (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/military/136367-usaf-tackles-pilot-shortage.html)

RustyShacklford 01-17-2022 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by new guy (Post 3354517)
Did that program I read annoy in 2017/2018 every go through? It was to offer two paths; one being the traditional move up, hold command positions, staff, blah both blah traditional route and the other was geared to letting the flyers be flyers over the course of their career. It seemed like a real way to address the issue seen in your industry is moving up means moving away from hit flight line.

From what I understand only two C-17 guys took the "fly only" track deal. They were only offering it to the folks who were at the stay in/get out decision point in their careers anyway, and most had already made up their mind or feared it as just another bait-and-switch trap. They should've offered it to senior captains and junior majors. I know a lot of guys who probably would've jumped right on.

paulcg77 01-17-2022 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by Av8tr1 (Post 3354666)
the newer two piece flight suits. https://www.uspatriottactical.com/ma...hoC7hgQAvD_BwE

I’ve got one and love it. I can layer up under it or take a layer off if it’s hot. Easier to put on or take off. So much better then the old adult onesie. Makes pooping soooooo much easier.

In Army digital camo, no doubt. I've seen something similar to this on our end, but I'll pass and stick with my olive green onesie that my father and my father's father wore, thanks :)

Hobbit64 01-18-2022 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by paulcg77 (Post 3354863)
In Army digital camo, no doubt. I've seen something similar to this on our end, but I'll pass and stick with my olive green onesie that my father and my father's father wore, thanks :)

back in the late 90’s when the AVN BDU’s came out, their cost was 4 times what a one piece flight suit cost. And they wore out much faster. Stupid!

But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear.

Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast.

rickair7777 01-18-2022 05:37 AM


Originally Posted by kaputt (Post 3354834)
A space focused force is not a bad idea. I’ve sat in on some of the briefs of what our near peer competitors (especially one in particular) are doing or want to do in space. The space dudes are nerds, but important nerds, and getting out of the shadow of the Air Force has helped and will help them focus on their mission. Totally agree on the name being a miss though. Pulling from the RUMINT wheel again, but apparently Space Corps was under heavy consideration, but the Marines threw a fit over the possibility of the word Corps being added to the end of Space.

Overheard on a high school quad....

"YOU'RE joining the Corps after graduation??? How many pullups can you do?"

"None. How many DDoS attacks can you execute in 90 seconds?"


You could have made the same argument for a Cyber Force, perhaps with more urgency. Although we kind of already have a national cyber force comprised of NSA and their not-so-loose affiliation with cybercom and it's subordinate elements.

Excargodog 01-18-2022 06:49 AM

Military Uniform stupidity is ingrained in the culture. Once upon a time NORAD - in a fit of concern over midair’s - painted all their tip tanks day-glo orange. Then yo up the ante, got day-glo orange flight suits. When the squadrons eventually rotated to SEA and got shot down, they found a real dearth of day-glo orange vegetation to hide in.

Later on a USAF Chief of staff was also uniform obsessed. Came up with a number of different uniforms - that no one but he liked.

https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0109uniform/

Fortunately, he only held that position for three years and the institution slow-rolled his idiocy until someone more reasonable replaced him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-3ab085817d68/

I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.

rickair7777 01-18-2022 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by Excargodog (Post 3355024)
I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.

One of the majors rolled out a very smurf-like uniform a few years ago. The pilot group flat out refused to wear it, and are still in black pants, white shirts today. Their WO regional didn't display quite as much sack as the mainline guys, and they look ridiculous to this day.

hydrostream 01-18-2022 10:44 AM

Meh. I like the blue.

rickair7777 01-18-2022 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by hydrostream (Post 3355188)
Meh. I like the blue.

Honestly it was the cut more than the color... might be OK if you have a good personal tailor.

paulcg77 01-18-2022 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by Hobbit64 (Post 3354963)
back in the late 90’s when the AVN BDU’s came out, their cost was 4 times what a one piece flight suit cost. And they wore out much faster. Stupid!

But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear.

Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast.

You're right but I think there' s a distinct difference between how the navy treats aviation versus how the army treats aviation. Naval aviation is given its own priority and isn't competing with the air force - we've got our own C130's, our own 737 transports, etc., and aviators in VP, VR and VQ squadrons (P-8, C-37. C-40, C-130, EP-3, E-6) never touch the blue water navy, never have to do underway cruises, never get to find their sea legs, pretty much don't touch water at all their entire careers in the navy unless they request a non-flying u/w tour which is pretty much just to get the sea service ribbon. Even in the USMC, where every marine is a rifleman and marine pilots still get infantry training in TBS, there is no one size fits all "you better blend in" aviator envy with the rest of their branch the way that the army tries to make their aviators lose their own identities. The way the army treats its aviators is definitely unique among the branches.

The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right.

Hobbit64 01-18-2022 01:18 PM


Originally Posted by paulcg77 (Post 3355251)
You're right but I think there' s a distinct difference between how the navy treats aviation versus how the army treats aviation. Naval aviation is given its own priority and isn't competing with the air force - we've got our own C130's, our own 737 transports, etc., and aviators in VP, VR and VQ squadrons (P-8, C-37. C-40, C-130, EP-3, E-6) never touch the blue water navy, never have to do underway cruises, never get to find their sea legs, pretty much don't touch water at all their entire careers in the navy unless they request a non-flying u/w tour which is pretty much just to get the sea service ribbon. Even in the USMC, where every marine is a rifleman and marine pilots still get infantry training in TBS, there is no one size fits all "you better blend in" aviator envy with the rest of their branch the way that the army tries to make their aviators lose their own identities. The way the army treats its aviators is definitely unique among the branches.

The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right.

PREACH!!!
If I remember correctly, the Army COS gave the -27's away in exchange for another ground Combat Brigade, that I am sure has since been stood down. Meh!, no longer my problem or fight.
As I type, my retirement paperwork is making its way through the 7 layers of the candy-cane forest.
Due to the bureaucratic delays in processing said freedom packet, I have made it clear that I myself already 'identify' as a retired soul.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands