Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

USERRA and 401 K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2022 | 07:53 AM
  #1  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 239
Default USERRA and 401 K

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justi...eserve-veteran


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, September 7, 2022

Justice Department Secures Relief Against American Airlines for Air Force Reserve Veteran

The Justice Department announced today that it had resolved a claim that American Airlines (American) violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) by underfunding the 401(k) retirement account of Thomas P. Harwood III, a veteran of the U.S. Air Force Reserve, after he returned to work from various military obligations. Mr. Harwood is a Major General (O-8) (Ret.) who joined the U.S. Air Force in 1981, served in the U.S. Air Force Reserve from 1991 until his retirement in 2016, and has worked for American Airlines as a commercial pilot since 1992
Reply
Old 09-09-2022 | 04:11 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
Default

I wonder how the law applies if the employer only has a 401k match not a direct contribution? Piedmont a AA owned airline believes they have no obligation in that situation.
Reply
Old 09-09-2022 | 07:59 AM
  #3  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I wonder how the law applies if the employer only has a 401k match not a direct contribution? Piedmont a AA owned airline believes they have no obligation in that situation.
Not clear, court would have to decide.

Actually, these sorts of lawsuits are typically based on the "me too" provisions of USERRA which specifies that employees on mil leave shall be afforded all of the benefits offered to ANY other employees on leave. So it would probably come down to that. Example, employers who virtue signal wokeness by offering paid pregnancy leave for women then find themselves having to provide full pay to those on mil leave as well.
Reply
Old 09-10-2022 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
Flying Boxes's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Not clear, court would have to decide.

Actually, these sorts of lawsuits are typically based on the "me too" provisions of USERRA which specifies that employees on mil leave shall be afforded all of the benefits offered to ANY other employees on leave. So it would probably come down to that. Example, employers who virtue signal wokeness by offering paid pregnancy leave for women then find themselves having to provide full pay to those on mil leave as well.
When I returned long term Mil leave, I had to contribute the required contributions for each year of Mil leave to trigger company contributions. Hardest part was getting to the correct person to set it up! Law allows 401K contributions (minus any TSP) and requires company to contribute as it normally would. This includes after tax contributions to the IRS limit for that year.
Reply
Old 09-11-2022 | 02:46 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Example, employers who virtue signal wokeness by offering paid pregnancy leave for women then find themselves having to provide full pay to those on mil leave as well.
wow! Which airlines offer that?
Reply
Old 09-11-2022 | 06:45 AM
  #6  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
wow! Which airlines offer that?
At least one them, they lost the case.
Reply
Old 09-11-2022 | 06:46 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Boxes
When I returned long term Mil leave, I had to contribute the required contributions for each year of Mil leave to trigger company contributions. Hardest part was getting to the correct person to set it up! Law allows 401K contributions (minus any TSP) and requires company to contribute as it normally would. This includes after tax contributions to the IRS limit for that year.
Any idea if USERRA specifies that, or if it was triggered by the me too provision? That would vary by airline depending on what they offer for other LOAs.
Reply
Old 09-14-2022 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
Flying Boxes's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Any idea if USERRA specifies that, or if it was triggered by the me too provision? That would vary by airline depending on what they offer for other LOAs.
not %100 sure. Company had to determine imputed earnings to determine how much of my makeup contributions could be tax free and how much after tax. Talking to financial company they said Mil leave years contributions were separate contribution from current year contribution. And suggested I contribute the required amount for each year first to trigger the company match! Then which year was irrelevant.

401k did not appear to be related to any me too clause. Retirement is separate issue. Sick accrual and eventual retirement addition was part of me too relating other LOA benefits.

Companies don’t just give you 401K makeup. It is USERRA. And I think it also required any match for those makeup years.

hope this helps others!
Reply
Old 12-11-2022 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans...erra-and-sscra

I’ve gone through this at a company without direct contribution, where we have to contribute to get a match.

After returning from long term mil, I got a letter from the company with an annual breakdown by years I was gone. As noted above, it’s based off USERRA-deemed compensation. It listed how much I needed to contribute to get the match, plus the max I could contribute up to the annual max for each “missed” year while I was on military. It also payed out the end date for making contributions (three times the leave length or five years, whichever was shorter, I believe).

For example, it was $18,000 in 2016. I could contribute $4,000 to get the full company match and another $14,000 to max it out (numbers are fictional). This is all in parallel with your current-year 401(k).

Make-up contributions filled the first eligible year bucket first. 2013, then 2014, etc. In 2016, when I got my W-2 for 2015, it listed Box 12, D codes by year to account for what was make-up contributed to each year:

D13 $8,000 (for 2013)
D14 $8,000 (for 2014)
D $10,000 (for 2017)

In 2017, my W-2 for 2016 had D14 for any remaining make up for 2014, D15 for 2015, etc. Had to file paper by hand since it was so rare the common tax software systems at the time couldn’t ingest D14 codes.

That’s way down in the weeds on details, but hopefully it helps.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SteveA
Cargo
48
04-24-2014 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices