Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USAF pilot retention demo program revealed… >

USAF pilot retention demo program revealed?

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

USAF pilot retention demo program revealed…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2023 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 675
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020
There is one, its called the ANG/AFRC.

Pretty much. Active duty has a lot of C2 and staff jobs, some of which are actually vital to large scale military logistics, planning, and operations.

Do you really want the entire air warfare enterprise managed top-to-bottom by non-rated people? Didn't think so.

Sam applies to all other MOS. For all it's faults, mil leadership all have operational roots. Somebody has to do the grownup jobs.
Reply
Old 08-23-2023 | 08:43 AM
  #12  
hindsight2020's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 862
Likes: 1
From: Center seat, doing loops to music
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Somebody has to do the grownup jobs.
Easy on the condescension, my tactical level job is plenty grown up. My experience as a senior member in said role is valued and my schedules work well for my family needs and circumstances, which is to say they empower me to keep serving, something the service ought not to take for granted.

Direct your "grown up job" nonsense to the regular component who can't seem to retain talent if their life depended on it. It'll be a cold day in hell when I start taking aspersions of vocational cherry-picking from airline pilots, of all people.
Reply
Old 08-23-2023 | 09:32 AM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 675
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by hindsight2020
Easy on the condescension, my tactical level job is plenty grown up. My experience as a senior member in said role is valued and my schedules work well for my family needs and circumstances, which is to say they empower me to keep serving, something the service ought not to take for granted.

Direct your "grown up job" nonsense to the regular component who can't seem to retain talent if their life depended on it. It'll be a cold day in hell when I start taking aspersions of vocational cherry-picking from airline pilots, of all people.
Not condescension, I would have stayed operational until the day I retired if I could have. They had to drag me kicking and screaming to staff and every minute of it was what you'd expect. But by the time I was done I realized that somebody has to do it, and you really want that somebody to have a deep operational background.

"Grownup" as in the fun is over and now it's a job.

It's disingenuous to complain that they should just let pilots fly... if they didn't need experienced pilot officers in major leadership positions, they'd do like the army and just use warrants. Army can do that because aviation is very much a sideshow in their world, they don't need or want stick monkeys driving their big picture.
Reply
Old 08-23-2023 | 06:05 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,633
Likes: 209
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear
Doing the calculator at military.com this is what I come up with for an 8yr O-3 drawing BAS, BAQ, and Flight Pay: $123,830. That's using CLT for BAQ which is a low to moderate COL.
Throw in the max bonus for signing your life away ($50K) and you're looking at $173,830 annually.
After making O-4 it's $196,078 total with bonus. O-5 is $204,841.

Looking at someone like Delta you're making over $150K by year 2. And factor the spouse working, something they may not be able to do when getting a PCS every 3-4 years.

The Air Force has never been able to manage their pilot force. In 1989 we were offered a bonus to sign up until year 14. Back then the commitment for pilot training was 6-7 years I think. I was in from spring 1981 until early 1989.
I remember how the wives of the O-4's were so angry because O-3's would be making more if they took the bonus. O-4's weren't eligible. Of course some squadron commanders misused the bonus as a "loyalty test", if you didn't take it you weren't a "team player".

I remember reading in the past few years they changed the promotion percentage from O-3 to O-4 to 100% to encourage pilots to stay in. Basically unless you really screwed up you'd make Major. That was a smart move that might have helped some. But AFAIK they haven't done the one thing many pilots want.....to keep on flying, not do desk jobs. A professional pilot track.
I think most people that complain about staff work A) didn’t spend most of their flying time in wars and B) probably didn’t have a staff job. There are jobs where you’re going to work your butt off, but they are generally very selective and the people want to be there for the career progression benefits they provide. Most however, are jobs where you got more time at home with your family while making the same pay that you would have in a cockpit spending those same years away from them.

To the original topic, though, unless they’re lazy, those eligible to separate today are O-4s (at least in the USAF). This won’t make a dent in much. By that point, those that were going to get out still will and those that were going to stay in anyway will get paid more than they have been offering in recent years. Good deal for the latter.
Reply
Old 08-25-2023 | 07:00 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 693
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Not condescension, I would have stayed operational until the day I retired if I could have. They had to drag me kicking and screaming to staff and every minute of it was what you'd expect. But by the time I was done I realized that somebody has to do it, and you really want that somebody to have a deep operational background.

"Grownup" as in the fun is over and now it's a job.

It's disingenuous to complain that they should just let pilots fly... if they didn't need experienced pilot officers in major leadership positions, they'd do like the army and just use warrants. Army can do that because aviation is very much a sideshow in their world, they don't need or want stick monkeys driving their big picture.
Spoken like a person who either has never served in a standard Army Aviation unit or a Flag Officer with little to no relevant/current information; or both.
Reply
Old 08-25-2023 | 07:31 AM
  #16  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 675
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Hobbit64
Spoken like a person who either has never served in a standard Army Aviation unit or a Flag Officer with little to no relevant/current information; or both.
My info is dated, never served in but spent plenty of quality field time associating with expeditionary army air units. The have a relatively small number of regular officers to advance and eventually represent aviation at higher echelons. They represent, but don't drive the entire problem which is the case for USAF and to a large degree USN, which relies on CVN strike for the bulk of it's conventional power projection.

What's changed?

I was not denigrating the stick monkeys, rather commenting on army cultural attitudes. Pretty sure I didn't get that part wrong...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bla bla bla
Regional
163
11-05-2007 09:18 PM
cruiseclimb
Major
39
12-22-2006 11:48 AM
cruiseclimb
Regional
0
12-15-2006 07:09 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
70
03-10-2006 09:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices