Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
9 Jul 09 KCBM T-6 mishap? >

9 Jul 09 KCBM T-6 mishap?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

9 Jul 09 KCBM T-6 mishap?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2009, 01:13 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I somewhat disagree. A multi-million dollar piece of taxpayer property was destroyed. Unless there are OPSEC or technology considerations, some basic info should be released. Otherwise the situation gives off coverup vibes.

Political considerations may preclude naming the pilot (or his nationality).

Rickair, what value added is there in releasing the name of aircrew involved in a mishap where no death occurred? That information is certainly available under FOIA(JAGMAN) and as such can be obtained by other means. In this case the latter part of your post is certainly true.
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 04:49 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bunk22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Retired Naval Aviator
Posts: 377
Default

I'm telling you right now, the Saudi's would have been very sensitive to letting it be known (public knowledge) if it was a RSNF student involved in a mishap. There certainly might be some political implications involved. As bad as 90% of the Saudi studs were (that might be an understatement), they certainly did not like any information getting out about their poor performance. Add a mishap to the equation and things get dicey. They pay well.
bunk22 is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 09:27 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tweet46's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Desert Poolie
Posts: 354
Default

Originally Posted by bunk22 View Post
I'm telling you right now, the Saudi's would have been very sensitive to letting it be known (public knowledge) if it was a RSNF student involved in a mishap. There certainly might be some political implications involved. As bad as 90% of the Saudi studs were (that might be an understatement), they certainly did not like any information getting out about their poor performance. Add a mishap to the equation and things get dicey. They pay well.
The Iraqi's will be the same.
Tweet46 is offline  
Old 07-22-2009, 09:41 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Default

They don't pay well.
LivingInMEM is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 10:41 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 79
Default

Safety Investigation Board= findings covered by safety privilege, not released outside of AF safety channels. Can ONLY be released by the Air Force Safety Center.

Accident Investigation Board=findings released to the public, when that board finishes, it'll be released

Nothing political nor any kind of cover up, just how the AF safety system works, you'll have answers, eventually. Names are never released in this type of situation, regardless of nationality or branch of service.
samy is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:23 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tweet46's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Desert Poolie
Posts: 354
Default

No offense intended but most of us have been around the military for a long time and know how the safety system works...there is less known about this accident then most similar situations.
Tweet46 is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 12:46 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bunk22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Retired Naval Aviator
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by LivingInMEM View Post
They don't pay well.
Maybe not monetary they don't. Regardless, they pay for a product and they get what they pay for...even if it means putting a half-ass aviator to their fleet.
bunk22 is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 12:47 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by Tweet46 View Post
No offense intended but most of us have been around the military for a long time and know how the safety system works...there is less known about this accident then most similar situations.

What is not known about this incident that would normally be known at this stage of the investigation by the public? We know that a T-6 crashed in a field and that a student pilot was at the controls, had minor injuries, was assigned to XX Squadron, based at YY AFB, Columbus, OH. Would it really be any different in any other situation?
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 06:15 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tweetdrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A-300 F/O
Posts: 281
Default

It was a solo student, nothing more needs to be said. If you can imagine it, it probably could happen. Previous to this the last two solo student phase II ejections from T-37s occurred as a result of (1) student screwing up a cuban eight and executing the roll nearly straight down, got disoriented and gave a Tweet a final resting place in the TX mesquite, and number (2) a solo student who G-Loc'd and woke up to a face full of dirt still in a disoriented state and gave one back to the taxpayers of Mississippi.

This will be nothing new. No state secrets, no conspiracy here--just a solo student who got out of an airplane. It is the cost of doing business and it happens/happened in ATC/AETC about once every 6 or seven years.
Tweetdrvr is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:10 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Default

Of all of the mishaps in the last 10 years involving foreign students in US aircraft, I'd like you to find an example where the USAF refused to release the nationality of the mishap pilot. Here is an example of where they did, and it is not the only one: Cause of Jet Collision Is Under Investigation - Los Angeles Times (and it was within days, not after the final report). This one involves US personnel, but they list names: B-1B in Fiery Crash in Texas; Crewmen Bail Out - Los Angeles Times. Here, they list the rank but no name: Military jet crashes in San Diego neighborhood - Los Angeles Times. They have also listed names on T-37 gear up landings. (Not saying they should, but the good old Command Posts were more than willing to help the press). There may be no conspiracy, but it is not normal for that information to be withheld.

Bunk, they are not paying for that product, just as they aren't paying for all of those King Air's and Caravans they are getting.
LivingInMEM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trashhauler
Cargo
143
07-18-2009 10:05 AM
USMCFLYR
Military
4
11-12-2008 07:39 PM
VQ2 Spanky
Military
27
11-08-2008 01:37 PM
CoastieFlier
Military
1
09-13-2008 02:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices