Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USAF Formalizes UAS as a Career Field >

USAF Formalizes UAS as a Career Field

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

USAF Formalizes UAS as a Career Field

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2010, 06:26 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 36
Default USAF Formalizes UAS as a Career Field

About time, too -- USAF will need a LOT more UAS pilots in the years ahead:

US Air Force formalises UAS pilot training
Flameout is offline  
Old 06-17-2010, 02:48 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UASIT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Default

From the same web-site....FAA study on UAS in civilian airspace...

FAA, Insitu start 2-yr study on UAS in civil airspace
UASIT is offline  
Old 06-17-2010, 07:35 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
G1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Skyhawk Left
Posts: 28
Default

Curious, what does the training program look like for this new field? How much actual flying do the guys get? Because I know they have to take you up through at least an instrument rating.
G1000 is offline  
Old 06-17-2010, 08:31 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by UASIT View Post
From the same web-site....FAA study on UAS in civilian airspace...

FAA, Insitu start 2-yr study on UAS in civil airspace
The big challenge here is "See and Avoid" which is one of the FAA's safety cornerstones (that's why the pilot is pretty much always faulted in a midair).

There are possible electronic solutions, but that would require that all manned civil aircraft operating in US airspace (including foreign airliners) buy the requisite piece of kit...$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. What do you think the ATA and AOPA lobbyists would have to say about THAT


Even nextgen ATC and ADS-B was not initially designed to handle UAS operations, and those technologies are nowhere near robust and reliable ennough to replace see-and-avoid.

My guess is that whatever ATC system comes after nextgen will be built from the ground up to incorporate UAS. But in the grand scheme of things UAS economics are small potatoes, and that tail is not going to be wagging the dog anytime soon. My guess? After 2050...

You could probably include UAS in class A airspace now (with some expensive reliability enhancements to the UAS), since theoretically there should be no VFR aircraft relying on see-and-avoid. But the real utility of many civil UAS is low and slow for surveillance so that might not get you a lot of benefit (other than ferry flights for predators and global hawks).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-17-2010, 09:08 AM
  #5  
On a beach with no ocean
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Unmanned
Posts: 166
Default

Right now the FAA is very leary when it comes to UAVs in civilian airspace. When we fly them back in the states we have a chase plane off our wing the whole time and have to stay in our own little slice of A/S that the FAA DOES NOT want us out of. Ive heard rumors of more cameras, ADS-B and other ideas. But the issues are very political at this point. Im not sure who got paid off to have the Reaper fly the boarder, but hey its a start.

By the way, and just an observation, ever notice how EVERY UAV gets called predator? Even if its a Reaper, hunter, Scan Eagle, scout, raven, and what ever else have you.

Everyone is getting nervous about UAVs taking manned jobs. But when you look at it, its still a very new and developing technology. Right now they fill a great niche, and can free up other assets to do there job better and more often. But it will be along long while before unmanned airliners and cargo birds are flying around. Maybe closer to 2100. LOL! The public doesn't like us yet, plus after the first UAV airliner or cargo accident it will be over.
exerauflyboy5 is offline  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:10 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by exerauflyboy5 View Post
Right now the FAA is very leary when it comes to UAVs in civilian airspace. When we fly them back in the states we have a chase plane off our wing the whole time and have to stay in our own little slice of A/S that the FAA DOES NOT want us out of. Ive heard rumors of more cameras, ADS-B and other ideas. But the issues are very political at this point. Im not sure who got paid off to have the Reaper fly the boarder, but hey its a start.

By the way, and just an observation, ever notice how EVERY UAV gets called predator? Even if its a Reaper, hunter, Scan Eagle, scout, raven, and what ever else have you.

Everyone is getting nervous about UAVs taking manned jobs. But when you look at it, its still a very new and developing technology. Right now they fill a great niche, and can free up other assets to do there job better and more often. But it will be along long while before unmanned airliners and cargo birds are flying around. Maybe closer to 2100. LOL! The public doesn't like us yet, plus after the first UAV airliner or cargo accident it will be over.

Do you like the job? Is it challenging?
N5139 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Flight Schools and Training
12
10-30-2014 04:46 PM
130drvr
Military
20
06-22-2009 03:12 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices