Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Boeing Awarded AF Tanker Contract >

Boeing Awarded AF Tanker Contract

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Boeing Awarded AF Tanker Contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2011, 01:23 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter View Post
All of which could have been developed and produced in the US creating US jobs. Not to mention the loss of the manufacturing capacity when buying foreign goods for the US military.

Each and every one of those programs could have been cut off (parts, tech support, etc.) on the whim of a foreign government at any time.

And you think that's a good thing?

Not saying it's a good or bad thing, it just is. I took your orginal statement about foreign made weapons as an implication that it would be something new. Just pointing out there's nothing new in it.

That said, I would argue that no foreign govt could have cut off any of these programs as they are all produced in the USA. I think the whole jobs argument on the airbus was BS, but it's a fact that a North American company was set up to supply and support the planes. It would have been an American controlled company building planes with American workers in America.

The M9 has it's issues no doubt, haven't heard a lot of real complaints against the 249 and 240. Should we have purchased an inferior US designed weapon? Is there any merit to the idea of buying the best design, and ensuring it's built in the US in independant facilities?

I have no idea which aircraft is better, I'll just be happy to see a new tanker before I die. However, I do find the "buy America" argument as a reason for Boeing over Airbus weak at best.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:54 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Doesn't matter Sputnik, Airbus's airplane wasn't the better choice.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:19 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy View Post
Doesn't matter Sputnik, Airbus's airplane wasn't the better choice.

I'll take your word for it, wasn't my point.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:53 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
I'll take your word for it, wasn't my point.

Grumble is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:58 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hjs1971's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: KC-135R IP/EP
Posts: 273
Default

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Love that pic...TACC must have those posters at every computer station and telephone.
hjs1971 is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 03:54 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 151
Default

I don't even think the first unit to get the first one off the line will see it within 5 years. First two go to Altus I heard,...them McConnell,...etc
JimmyJr3 is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:08 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

It was a joke.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:56 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
Yeah, can't argue with that. That's a great photo.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:56 PM
  #29  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

If you guys don't start behaving pretty soon Jungle may show up with that bunny with a pancake on his head. Just telling 'ya so as to avoid that.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 02-26-2011, 03:57 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Spur View Post
No, only the 1st 4 would be flown to mobile. The rest would be assembled there, then modified by Northrop.
I thought Northrop dropped its participation with EADS when the new RFP was released (favoring the smaller tanker design).

The truth is that such large scale manufacturing is by necessity an international business. I wonder how many Boeing parts are made in Europe?

At least Boeing hasn't had a boom fall off yet.
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UPSAv8tr
Cargo
1
02-24-2011 01:42 PM
b82rez
Major
728
03-31-2010 06:10 PM
11Fan
Military
6
09-15-2009 09:50 PM
jet320
Hiring News
4
06-12-2008 07:12 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices