Notices
Military Military Aviation

C-5 vs. C-17

Old 01-04-2013, 02:36 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker-driver View Post
Neither can do much without a Tanker!
No no no ... please, don't use tankers for AMC missions. We need tankers for the combat air forces. If it has to get there that fast, FedEx it.

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver View Post
Personally, I favor the small crew. I'd go nuts dealing with 20 different aircrew on a 10 day trip!
C17D
I always heard the C-5 guys complaining about crews. In the -10 world, similar to what another mentioned, we ended up with big crews when it came to DV support.

1 Mission Commander (sometimes 1 of the 4 pilots)
4 Pilots
2 Engineers
3 Booms
1 Purser
2 or 3 Aircraft Mechanics
2 Comm Personnel
1 Comm Mechanic
6 Ravens
3 Flight Attendants

And of course, there would almost always be a boom evaluator on board.

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
who gets more flying hours ? C-17 guy or C-5 guy

also, relatively speaking, who gets the better TDY locations on the road ?
Guessing, the C-17 guys. In the KC-10, I flew to more than double the number of airports what my best friend flew in the C-5. And he'd been flying the C-5 longer than I had been in the KC-10.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 02:37 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Originally Posted by Golden Bear View Post
Reminds me of a time riding up front on a UAL flight with a captain who flew 130s in the 80s and a F/O who flew them in the 90s.

After sharing a few stories about the glory days the captain looks back and says "All you young guys grew up starry eyed after watching Top Gun as little kids. You know where the real fun is flying airplanes? Tactical Airlift."
+1..........
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 02:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 199
Default

A few thousand in Fred and a fair amount in Barney.

Bottom line...different jet...same AF.
Rhino12 is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 03:04 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Flys135s's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Tail Surfing on a 737
Posts: 64
Default Fueled by Scotch

3 fat kids trying to decide who the fastest runner is.

Flys135s is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 04:41 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LowSlowT2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
I can count on 1 hand the times I've had to operationally A/R
Every single OEF and OIF mission required at least one and usually two operational AR for the first few months. I got my requal AR check after returning to the plane from an exchange tour on an operational combat sortie...

Originally Posted by KC10 FATBoy
No no no ... please, don't use tankers for AMC missions. We need tankers for the combat air forces. If it has to get there that fast, FedEx it.
And we need them in SOF!
LowSlowT2 is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 07:37 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
SunSherpa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Ex-C-141C Nav/Current C-23C Pilot
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
I'm also a C-5M guy and we are very capable....the M model brings basically a new side to heavy airlift.

Each airplane has its role. We can carry a lot of cargo a long way, and the C-17 can carry a little cargo a long way (with an A/R). C-17s go to dirt strips and more austere airfields than us.

But so far we continue to put the gear down and land at the right airports
But known to occasionally shut down the wrong engine in an emergency return back to the field!

Can we start a petition to bring back the C-141 Starlifter please...
SunSherpa is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 08:26 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LowSlowT2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Default

As with the C141, the C5 and C17 crews will be flown home from the boneyard by a Herk!
LowSlowT2 is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 02:31 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Riddler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Left Seat, Toyota Tacoma
Posts: 593
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit View Post
You Betcha'. Had to work 2x as much to hit my other job's 2nd year pay.

The grind was worse than airdrop currency back in the day.

I dig the teaching, owning the jets and hacking the mish w/ newbs, can't wait til it's easy for everyone, relatively.

Somebody need a slightly used RODEO clown?
Picturing you as a slightly used rodeo clown... priceless!
Riddler is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 03:18 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Originally Posted by LowSlowT2 View Post
As with the C141, the C5 and C17 crews will be flown home from the boneyard by a Herk!
+1.........

When the C-17 production line is closed... and the mods to the C-5M are done.... Lockheed will still be producing the Mighty Hercules... ... Nearing SIXTY years and counting.....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 01-05-2013, 03:45 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130 View Post
+1.........

When the C-17 production line is closed... and the mods to the C-5M are done.... Lockheed will still be producing the Mighty Hercules... ... Nearing SIXTY years and counting.....
Agreed!

It's okay to be Jay.
Lobaeux is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices