Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

C-5 vs. C-17

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:38 AM
  #61  
MoosePileit's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: The IPA EB speaks for me
Default

Great post! T.E. is one smart fella and that is a good website.

Was your bottom quote just from this:

FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - What's the deal with MD-11s?

If so, nice find!
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:46 AM
  #62  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MoosePileit
Great post! T.E. is one smart fella and that is a good website.

Was your bottom quote just from this:

FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - What's the deal with MD-11s?

If so, nice find!
If you're talking about the copy-paste/quote I posted, I actually got it from and old post on APC years ago when the discussion came up comparing various freight aircraft.

But I'd venture to guess that whomever posted here got it from elsewhere as well.
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 12:49 PM
  #63  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Skeptical
Default

Here's an unusual 130 mod:

How to Land a 35-Ton, 4-Engine Military Cargo Aircraft Inside of a Soccer Stadium | I Like To Waste My Time
Reply
Old 01-18-2013 | 10:12 AM
  #64  
LowSlowT2's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Default

Ah yes, Credible Sport. What an amazing engineering accomplishment. The last remaining plane is at Robins AFB Museum, but they want to get rid of it. So far, no takers, and it may go to the scrap heap, which would be a shame.
Reply
Old 01-23-2013 | 12:24 PM
  #65  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tanker-driver
Neither can do much without a Tanker!
You got that right brother!!
Reply
Old 02-18-2013 | 08:44 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
From: Babysitter
Default

So, does the C-5 still break everywhere you go? Just saying.......The C-17 you tend to forget how large the aircraft is when you're flying it....the fly by wire is pretty awesome......and the combat descent is pretty awesome.....don't think the C-5 can do that......
Reply
Old 02-18-2013 | 01:35 PM
  #67  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

I'm a guy at a C-5 and C-17 base...and I see the stats weekly. C-5Ms are much improved in reliability over the C-5A/B/Cs, but they still can't keep up with the C-17. C-5s do well when their maintenance is managed well.
Reply
Old 02-22-2013 | 03:11 PM
  #68  
UPTme's Avatar
Hire me
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fading blue
I'm a guy at a C-5 and C-17 base...and I see the stats weekly. C-5Ms are much improved in reliability over the C-5A/B/Cs, but they still can't keep up with the C-17. C-5s do well when their maintenance is managed well.
I have a 600 knot ground speed when I have 150 knots of tailwind, too.
Reply
Old 02-24-2013 | 11:26 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,556
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by WARich
So, does the C-5 still break everywhere you go? Just saying.......The C-17 you tend to forget how large the aircraft is when you're flying it....the fly by wire is pretty awesome......and the combat descent is pretty awesome.....don't think the C-5 can do that......
that's cute.
Reply
Old 03-01-2013 | 07:01 AM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 814
Likes: 27
From: Wind checker
Default

and the combat descent is pretty awesome.....don't think the C-5 can do that......


I'm assuming you've never seen 350/.825 with the inboard TRs deployed. Additionally, I've seen fully configured straight-ins and randoms from 20,000 done in less than 25 miles...that sporty enough for you?
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices