Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Panetta's Parting Shot >

Panetta's Parting Shot

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Panetta's Parting Shot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2013 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
angry tanker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 F/O
Default Panetta's Parting Shot

Panetta to propose military pay cut after Obama raised federal officials pay | WashingtonExaminer.com

Thanks for all the rides to and from the west coast...****!

Nice
Reply
Old 02-06-2013 | 05:57 PM
  #2  
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 46
From: Volleyball Player
Default

How long has the "officials" pay been frozen? How recently has the military pay been increased? Are we comparing two things that can be compared, or two things that are totally different? As a government employee, I may get a 1% raise in a field where pay rates have been frozen for years, on the other hand, I've heard if we get sequestration, it goes away.
Reply
Old 02-06-2013 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

We get less, people that don't work get more.....story of the last few years.
Reply
Old 02-06-2013 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,896
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

We need a holistic approach to defense cuts, not singling out any individual line item for whatever reason. Personnel and pay cuts should be made with an understanding and expectation of what the resulting consequences will be, and how that will impact defense readiness...and how that fits with the grand strategic plan. Is the JSCP aligned with intended cuts? I haven't looked at lately, but I kind of doubt it...

The tail's gonna be wagging the dog...
Reply
Old 02-06-2013 | 09:23 PM
  #5  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

Pentagon to cut aircraft carrier presence in Persian Gulf to 1 due to budget strains | Fox News
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 03:52 AM
  #6  
UnderOveur's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: Holding over Macho Grande
Default


This is all part of the(ir) plan. Could see it coming from a mile away, and most have. It's a lot like the "Arab Spring" that has quickly turned to winter. Anyone surprised by it hasn't been using their brain.
Reply
Old 02-07-2013 | 06:53 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,896
Likes: 690
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

The two-carrier presence in the gulf was clearly a temporary measure, most certainly not the historical norm, and it was known all along that it was unsustainable in the long run given CVN yard schedules.

The only way to sustain that without pulling a boat out of some other part of the world would be to buy a twelfth carrier. You'd probably need 13 if you wanted to get deployments back down to anything like 6 months.
Reply
Old 02-08-2013 | 05:53 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

There are plenty of areas to cut and save within the military. The biggest problem is the local congressman who says "not in my district." I remember years ago when there was a plan to consolidate a lot of activities at Eglin AFB that involved moving some functions out of New Mexico. Huge potential savings. Staffer from New Mexico Senator's office called and said this would be a bad idea. I am sure this goes on every day throughout the military.
One thing that used to chap my butt was the drive to zero out your flying time at the end of the year. Never mind if you didn't need it. Just go burn holes in the sky and make the boss look good. Also, spend all of your money or you may not get it next year. Buy whatever you don't need just so you can spend that money.
A good management team could do wonders for the military if they had the authority.
Reply
Old 02-08-2013 | 06:15 AM
  #9  
Hops and Barley's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Hey guys... C'mon. Drop in th bucket all of this. Here is an idea. Don't cut anything from the military. Find it from all the other crap the gov spends that is unneeded. I'm sick of doing less with less and hearing about how we waste money when we are one of the few places the Gov gets a bang for its buck and not taken to the wood shed.
Reply
Old 02-08-2013 | 06:19 PM
  #10  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 54
Likes: 1
Default

I think that military cuts are unavoidable. Regardless of your politics, this is something that we have to deal with in the here and now. We waste untold billions every year propping up useless bases in certain congressional districts, meanwhile we're cutting flight hours and hollowing out the force because there's not enough funds to go around.

This pork barrel defense spending is corruption, plain and simple. Politicians are using the presence of military installations to buy votes (rather than focusing on a unified, efficient national strategy), no different than how a politician doles out welfare spending to buy votes. This is the kind of thing you expected from the Soviet Union, not the U.S. Sad state of affairs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MoarAlpha
Regional
12
12-22-2012 04:11 AM
satpak77
Pilot Health
4
09-16-2012 04:26 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
05-14-2011 09:52 PM
Cessnadriver
Major
14
07-06-2010 10:23 PM
rthompsonjr
Hangar Talk
1
10-02-2008 10:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices