Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
DCS A-10C Realism Question >

DCS A-10C Realism Question

Notices
Military Military Aviation

DCS A-10C Realism Question

Old 03-06-2013, 06:55 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
9ESOCCFI's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: C525
Posts: 62
Default DCS A-10C Realism Question

A few questions for current and former A10 pilots.

Work has been slow the last few days so I have been browsing You Tube videos. I came across videos of a PC based A-10 combat flight simulator. It is called DCS A-10C produced by a Russian company by the name of Eagle Dynamics. It appears that the player can move every switch and manipulate all the controls. In a few of the videos it shows how you can change the profiles on the different weapons that are being carried on the aircraft, change the programs on the countermeasure panel, and change the layout of the HUD. There are other videos that show what I am led to believe are the full start up procedure and look very detailed. Here are a few videos showing the depth of the simulator.

DCS A-10C Warthog - GAU-8/A Avenger Cannon - YouTube

DCS: A-10C Warthog. Mk-82AIR High Drag to Low Drag - YouTube

DCS A-10C - CR Example - YouTube

After watching the videos, does the aircraft seem pretty accurate to real life and if accurate enough, do you see this program being a benefit and cost saving measure for real world A10 training.

Just curious what a real Thunderbolt pilot thinks of this $50 sim.
9ESOCCFI is offline  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:15 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by 9ESOCCFI View Post
A few questions for current and former A10 pilots.

Work has been slow the last few days so I have been browsing You Tube videos. I came across videos of a PC based A-10 combat flight simulator. It is called DCS A-10C produced by a Russian company by the name of Eagle Dynamics. It appears that the player can move every switch and manipulate all the controls. In a few of the videos it shows how you can change the profiles on the different weapons that are being carried on the aircraft, change the programs on the countermeasure panel, and change the layout of the HUD. There are other videos that show what I am led to believe are the full start up procedure and look very detailed. Here are a few videos showing the depth of the simulator.

DCS A-10C Warthog - GAU-8/A Avenger Cannon - YouTube

DCS: A-10C Warthog. Mk-82AIR High Drag to Low Drag - YouTube

DCS A-10C - CR Example - YouTube

After watching the videos, does the aircraft seem pretty accurate to real life and if accurate enough, do you see this program being a benefit and cost saving measure for real world A10 training.

Just curious what a real Thunderbolt pilot thinks of this $50 sim.

I won't answer specifically for A-10 pilots but in general the services have all experimented with low cost trainers/simulations that are PC based. The Navy used Microsoft Flight Simulator and T-34 profiles that were developed by a flight student. I dont know if those low cost trainers are still in place in the training command, but they were somewhat useful at that stage. For the most part they replicate procedural based training and do not have the fidelity in terms of mission computers/flight characteristics to properly emulate the aircraft. Even the high cost/fidelity simulators that we use in our training and workups are only good to a point.

Some years ago when fatigue/life expectancy really became an issue for many of our air frames, senior leadership (Navy and I would assume USAF as well) set out on a course to replace actual flight hours with simulator hours and to some extent in some areas brought a return on investment (smart weapon training/EP proficiency). But, at the end of the day, and I'm sure many of my brethren here will agree, we can all count the number of times we've been scared or under stress in the sim on one hand, for me that's when the power went out. I say that in jest, but its true. While simulators can aid in procedures and in some case tactics instruction, no simulator time can truly replicate flying the jet and the decision making process that goes into each portion of each sortie flown.
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 03-07-2013, 09:39 AM
  #3  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,268
Default

Having to click on switches and buttons with a mouse sounds pretty tedious. I'll put my $50 elsewhere...

Now, if you managed to build/obtain an A-10 cockpit from the bone yard and get it up and running with the sim, that may be more enjoyable.


Originally Posted by BDGERJMN
I won't answer specifically for A-10 pilots but in general the services have all experimented with low cost trainers/simulations that are PC based. The Navy used Microsoft Flight Simulator and T-34 profiles that were developed by a flight student. I dont know if those low cost trainers are still in place in the training command, but they were somewhat useful at that stage. For the most part they replicate procedural based training and do not have the fidelity in terms of mission computers/flight characteristics to properly emulate the aircraft. Even the high cost/fidelity simulators that we use in our training and workups are only good to a point.

Some years ago when fatigue/life expectancy really became an issue for many of our air frames, senior leadership (Navy and I would assume USAF as well) set out on a course to replace actual flight hours with simulator hours and to some extent in some areas brought a return on investment (smart weapon training/EP proficiency). But, at the end of the day, and I'm sure many of my brethren here will agree, we can all count the number of times we've been scared or under stress in the sim on one hand, for me that's when the power went out. I say that in jest, but its true. While simulators can aid in procedures and in some case tactics instruction, no simulator time can truly replicate flying the jet and the decision making process that goes into each portion of each sortie flown.
Yeah, but is it realistic?
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 03-07-2013, 10:09 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trafly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by 9ESOCCFI View Post
Just curious what a real Thunderbolt pilot thinks of this $50 sim.
Waiting for a Hog pilot to object to being called a Thunderbolt.........
trafly is offline  
Old 03-10-2013, 06:48 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hawgdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: A-10
Posts: 142
Default

I watched on of the videos and its very accurate. Im curious to know how a Russian company got this info. As for a game, this looks fun. As for training, not so much. Even the full cockpit sims we have on base with almost 360 views haves lot of limitations. They are good for switchology practice and forming habit patterns without burning JP8. But I will tell you that nothing can replace strapping on a jet doing the JOB for real.
hawgdriver is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 03:52 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by hawgdriver View Post
I watched on of the videos and its very accurate. Im curious to know how a Russian company got this info. As for a game, this looks fun. As for training, not so much. Even the full cockpit sims we have on base with almost 360 views haves lot of limitations. They are good for switchology practice and forming habit patterns without burning JP8. But I will tell you that nothing can replace strapping on a jet doing the JOB for real.
They got it from DoD. YOUR desktop trainers (purchased to enable original c model transition) had the software developed in Russia. Sounds like they just made this commercially available now?
Flamer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM
Cjp21
Major
6
02-28-2006 06:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices