Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Air Force Academy Snitch Program >

Air Force Academy Snitch Program

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Air Force Academy Snitch Program

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2014 | 06:48 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: A320 Right Seat
Default

I went to the Academy...This is TOTAL BS...If the OSI wants to put OSI Agents into the system to root out this kind of behavior--that's fine...To FORCE cadets into this Stasi-type environment because you have some dirt on them is terrible--If what they did is bad enough--kick them out, if not, set them to marching tours--But this Secret Police tactics which forces them to break the basic tenants of the Academy (Honor Code) is Effin ridiculous...
Reply
Old 01-02-2014 | 08:20 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 10
From: Petting Zoo
Default

You know, there is something I find distasteful about this whole thing, but I can't exactly articulate what.

Having said that, the only people I know of who were hurt by this were rapists and drug dealers. And I have trouble working up much sense of outrage about what happened to them.

I don't know what you mean by "FORCE." The only participants I know of got caught doing x, and were offered a potentially lighter punishment if they informed on others doing the same or worse. They didn't have to accept the deal, and I'm sure many haven't. Others did. I've seen this at other bases. And, uh, it appears to a regular approach used by law enforcement world wide.

I think a more accurate--if less sensationalistic--headline would have "Academy has a police force, which apparently does it's job."

Still, like you, I find it a little uncomfortable. I knew similar things happened when I was a cadet, it just didn't end up on the front page of the [then] GT.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 06:05 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik
You know, there is something I find distasteful about this whole thing, but I can't exactly articulate what.

Having said that, the only people I know of who were hurt by this were rapists and drug dealers. And I have trouble working up much sense of outrage about what happened to them.

I don't know what you mean by "FORCE." The only participants I know of got caught doing x, and were offered a potentially lighter punishment if they informed on others doing the same or worse. They didn't have to accept the deal, and I'm sure many haven't. Others did.
Except Cadet Thomas was not accused of any wrongdoing by the OSI (except maybe <gasp> underage drinking?), if the Gazette piece is accurate.

He was kicked out for misconduct which was actually part of his OSI effort.

Funny how USAFA waived his enlisted service commitment.

Air Force informant program

More info:

Gazette confirms former Air Force Academy cadet's account
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 08:51 AM
  #24  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 669
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AirbusFO
I went to the Academy...This is TOTAL BS...If the OSI wants to put OSI Agents into the system to root out this kind of behavior--that's fine...To FORCE cadets into this Stasi-type environment because you have some dirt on them is terrible--If what they did is bad enough--kick them out, if not, set them to marching tours--But this Secret Police tactics which forces them to break the basic tenants of the Academy (Honor Code) is Effin ridiculous...
Yes, this has gone over the top.

Discipline cadets who need it, root out the dope dealers and rapists, but don't play games like this.

The message is that the honor code applies at all times...unless you are furthering the agenda of the system, then it's OK and encouraged to lie.

This tears at the fundamental fabric of trust and unity we're supposed to be instilling in our officer corps from day one.

Let cops be cops and cadets be cadets.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 11:38 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Way screwed up!
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 11:41 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 10
From: Petting Zoo
Default

Originally Posted by Spur
Except Cadet Thomas was not accused of any wrongdoing by the OSI (except maybe <gasp> underage drinking?), if the Gazette piece is accurate.

He was kicked out for misconduct which was actually part of his OSI effort.
I've seen nothing to suggest he was in legal trouble with OSI (drinking is handled under cadet system, not UCMJ). OSI asked if he wanted to participate and he said yes. He was kicked out for disciplinary problems, not legal.

In his eyes he was kicked out for what he did for OSI. That opinion is not shared by the Air Force. I have no official knowledge of the case, but I was able to discover some of his disciplinary violations. He wasn't too bright, and made a continuous series of bad choices. This leads me to side with the AF over the cadet on the subject of his removal. The only mystery is why the process dragged out so long.

Again, no inside info on the case, but I would hardly expect the Gazette's story to be unbiased--it was clearly written from the cadet's point of view. The sinister description of OSI organizational structure was hilarious though.

As far as having informants....there ain't nothing new under the sun. But it doesn't seem right somehow.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 12:03 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Shouldn't some of these issues showed up prior to going the academy, like in the interview and background process. Sorry its a horses__t operation to use the OSI in this manner.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 12:18 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: 320A
Default

Having escaped from that institution of higher learning in 93 when virtually everyone who wanted to attend pilot training was shown the door with explanation that needs of the A F come first many of my classmates decided and did leave the USAF as soon as was possible as the full picture of the unidirectional nature of loyalty became fully realized. I was fortunate to work my way back into flight school, but after 20 yrs of service I can't legitimately make a case for keeping the school open. I met and worked with hundreds of fine officers that didn't attend. Honestly I'd be a fan of closing the whole school and put the savings in to new airframes.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 12:21 PM
  #29  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 669
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Shouldn't some of these issues showed up prior to going the academy, like in the interview and background process.

No screening process is perfect. But that's ONE of the reasons the academy environment is something of a pressure cooker...it provides bad apples another four years in which to deselect themselves. I don't view academy attrition for honor and misbehavior as a bad thing, it's mostly the system doing what it's supposed to do. I'd much rather it happen there than in the active-duty officer corps.
Reply
Old 01-04-2014 | 12:31 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,192
Likes: 10
From: Petting Zoo
Default

As I said above, I find the running of informants at the Academy distasteful, even if I can't articulate why. However, thus far I haven't found anyone--to include Thomas--that I can feel sorry for.

There is a longer thread about it on baseops where a few cadets have posted. One thing you'll notice is that no one says anything about how he got a raw deal.

I know a lot of cadets who were angry to discover there were informants among them. I have yet to meet one who knew him that thinks Thomas got kicked out for anything but what he deserved.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StallFail
Military
11
04-01-2017 04:12 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
26
03-03-2008 11:35 AM
weasil
Military
10
12-29-2007 05:30 AM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices