Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
B-21 to replace B-52 >

B-21 to replace B-52

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

B-21 to replace B-52

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2016, 08:36 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Default B-21 to replace B-52

From a cost standpoint, I don't get this. Doesn't the B-2 already do this?

Air Force unveils first image of B-21 long-range bomber - Washington Times
SayAlt is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 09:09 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,611
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt View Post
From a cost standpoint, I don't get this. Doesn't the B-2 already do this?

Air Force unveils first image of B-21 long-range bomber - Washington Times
B-21 is way more advanced than the B-2.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 10:06 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

And who is going to pay for it???
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 10:07 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
B-21 is way more advanced than the B-2.
I would think so........it looks so much different.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 10:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,611
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
I would think so........it looks so much different.
It is... It's the new fancy wrap used on high end cars to give that dull finish.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 10:59 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,611
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
And who is going to pay for it???
Top 5% and Wall Street... Haven't you heard Hillary and Bernie yet?
ugleeual is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 12:08 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
Top 5% and Wall Street... Haven't you heard Hillary and Bernie yet?
When are they going to ramp up the A-10 production. Let's get back to serious kick butt aircraft.........
WARich is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 01:20 PM
  #8  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Not satisfied that the F-35 will bankrupt the US and military, the Air Force ups the ante with a program projected to cost $60 Billion.

Wait for it; next will be the selection of the T-50 to replace the T-38 instead of a cheaper and more practical airplane for UPT (like the L-159).

B-52: bomb-truck; lots of bombs and loiter.

B-1: conventional-only; not a bad bomb-truck, but fewer bombs, less loiter, more expense.

B-2: in theory both conv and nuke. Limited conventional bombs; rumored to cost more than $100,000 an hour.

Yup....B-21 makes perfect sense....
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 03:03 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Guess the AF is looking for a name for the aircraft, any suggestions?
iceman49 is offline  
Old 02-28-2016, 03:26 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,242
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49 View Post
Guess the AF is looking for a name for the aircraft, any suggestions?
Bernie Bomber
maddogmax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
N43898
American
31
03-01-2015 07:46 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
c17heavy
Military
49
06-24-2011 10:20 AM
CaptainTeezy
Part 135
8
01-12-2011 10:33 AM
Freightbird
Hangar Talk
24
08-22-2010 08:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices