Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Can 135 check rides replace BFRs??? >

Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Search

Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2009 | 01:15 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Default Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Does anyone know if a 135 checkride can substitute for a BFR??? I havent seen anything in the regs that says it does...I know it would make sense that it would...but you never know with the FAA.
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 04:59 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Yes. 61.56(d)
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 05:23 AM
  #3  
propjunkie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: E-170
Default

Yep. Havent done a BFR in my life.
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 05:31 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Default

Teezy,

There was a discussion about this in the Aviation Law section. However, it pertained to SIC type rated pilots getting their checkrides in lieu of a BFR. Not sure if it will help, but here it is:

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/av...ht-review.html
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 11:11 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Default

Originally Posted by floydbird
Yes. 61.56(d)
What I thought was odd when I first saw 61.56d was that they didnt specifically say "121 or 135." But that is what I figured they meant, but I never like to ASS-U-ME (assume) the FAA is using common sense.
Reply
Old 11-09-2010 | 06:55 PM
  #6  
Oldog's Avatar
Apteryx
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy
Does anyone know if a 135 checkride can substitute for a BFR??? I havent seen anything in the regs that says it does...I know it would make sense that it would...but you never know with the FAA.
61.56(d) says, "A person who has, within [the past 24 calendar months] passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.

So . . . in a word, "Yes."
Reply
Old 01-11-2011 | 06:54 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

i was wondering the same thing
Reply
Old 01-12-2011 | 06:29 AM
  #8  
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: PT Inbound
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy
But that is what I figured they meant, but I never like to ASS-U-ME (assume) the FAA is using common sense.
That is usually a safe thing to... assume... lol (cue humorous drum beat)

Couldn't help myself, sorry lol
Reply
Old 01-12-2011 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

In addition keeping yourself 135.340 current is a basis for renewing your CFI. All you need is to fill out the 8710. I haven't taken a Flight Review or paid to renew my CFI in a while.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices