Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Can 135 check rides replace BFRs??? >

Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2009, 01:15 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Posts: 321
Default Can 135 check rides replace BFRs???

Does anyone know if a 135 checkride can substitute for a BFR??? I havent seen anything in the regs that says it does...I know it would make sense that it would...but you never know with the FAA.
CaptainTeezy is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 04:59 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 123
Default

Yes. 61.56(d)
floydbird is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 05:23 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
propjunkie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: E-170
Posts: 173
Default

Yep. Havent done a BFR in my life.
propjunkie is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 05:31 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Maddog FO
Posts: 651
Default

Teezy,

There was a discussion about this in the Aviation Law section. However, it pertained to SIC type rated pilots getting their checkrides in lieu of a BFR. Not sure if it will help, but here it is:

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/av...ht-review.html
Roper92 is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 11:11 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: I only fly multi-winged airplanes.
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by floydbird View Post
Yes. 61.56(d)
What I thought was odd when I first saw 61.56d was that they didnt specifically say "121 or 135." But that is what I figured they meant, but I never like to ASS-U-ME (assume) the FAA is using common sense.
CaptainTeezy is offline  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:55 PM
  #6  
Apteryx
 
Oldog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy View Post
Does anyone know if a 135 checkride can substitute for a BFR??? I havent seen anything in the regs that says it does...I know it would make sense that it would...but you never know with the FAA.
61.56(d) says, "A person who has, within [the past 24 calendar months] passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.

So . . . in a word, "Yes."
Oldog is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 06:54 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
Default

i was wondering the same thing
blade120 is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 06:29 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: PT Inbound
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainTeezy View Post
But that is what I figured they meant, but I never like to ASS-U-ME (assume) the FAA is using common sense.
That is usually a safe thing to... assume... lol (cue humorous drum beat)

Couldn't help myself, sorry lol
Fly Boy Knight is offline  
Old 01-12-2011, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 77
Default

In addition keeping yourself 135.340 current is a basis for renewing your CFI. All you need is to fill out the 8710. I haven't taken a Flight Review or paid to renew my CFI in a while.
dapper993 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices