Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Money Talk
The Root of a Lot of Evil >

The Root of a Lot of Evil

Notices
Money Talk Your hard-earned money

The Root of a Lot of Evil

Old 04-09-2010, 04:36 PM
  #11  
Careful w/that axe Eugene
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: HOTAS...and a SWA gear lever
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by jungle View Post
The situation is going to resolve itself eventually, we are on an unsustainable path and all the Kings men and all the Kings horses won't be able to mend it.
I agree, question is will sanity prevail and will we as a nation do it ourselves before an implosion? Hope so, but if not keep those EBR's handy.
Nortonious is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 07:45 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FighterHayabusa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
Please explain... not paying into the system and enjoying the benefits is a free ride if you ask me.
It's not a free ride for the reasons I laid out - they do pay federal income taxes, just not directly. Do you think that FICA taxes and sales taxes could be regressive without a progressive federal tax? Wouldn't a Big Mac be cheaper if McDonald's didn't have to pay corporate tax? Now, one could argue that it would be better - the federal government would be more accountable - if the working poor realized how much they were indeed paying, but to say that they are paying nothing is ridiculous. There was a study that showed all Americans pay roughly the same amount of overall tax when the dust finally settles - I'll try to find it again and post it.
FighterHayabusa is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 07:54 PM
  #13  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by FighterHayabusa View Post
It's not a free ride for the reasons I laid out - they do pay federal income taxes, just not directly. Do you think that FICA taxes and sales taxes could be regressive without a progressive federal tax? Wouldn't a Big Mac be cheaper if McDonald's didn't have to pay corporate tax? Now, one could argue that it would be better - the federal government would be more accountable - if the working poor realized how much they were indeed paying, but to say that they are paying nothing is ridiculous. There was a study that showed all Americans pay roughly the same amount of overall tax when the dust finally settles - I'll try to find it again and post it.
Nobody is saying they are paying nothing, the fact is that redistribution is called that for a reason. Why can't we all pay the same rate? Why are half of us taxed at one level and not the other.
The truth is that there is a near 50/50 split at the political level and the tax system is the primary cause. If I didn't have to pay Federal taxes, why would I care what they were or if they increased to unbearable levels?
You know the answer.
jungle is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:47 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EvilGN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: C-130
Posts: 381
Default

looks like there is a 4th topic that should never be argued....religion, sports, politics, and now taxes.....but what the hey

a flat tax may fix most of the fiscal monetary issues for the govt, but IMO its still unfair. the family of 4 making 30k a year probably lives in a home that is 90-100k (using the 3x yearly income rule). So that would allow the dude making 1M a year to live in a 3M house. The dude making 30k pays 3k, so that reduces his mortgage to 80-90k give or take, and millionaire is forced to live in a $2.7M house. Not to mention the yearly requirement to LIVE ie food, healthcare, education etc, its harder for the 30k guy to make ends meet. The millionaire will never go without healthcare, education, milk, booze :P etc. So with a flat income tax, should we make the millionaire pay a proportionately higher amount of money for food? Even if he eats at the most expensive eatery in NYC everyday, he is still doing better than the lower income family.

Funny thing is, I am the furthest person I know from calling my self a bleeding heart liberal, I firmly believe in survival of the fittest when it comes to capitalism. But as an ECON major (who remembers little from college) I have never seen a reason for not having a progressive income tax, while at the same time, flat taxes exists, and even regressive ones. Its the balance between all of them that would make things FAIR. But in our current system which NEEDS to be changed, that rich man still finds ways (thru spending money) to keep from paying his FAIR share

Last edited by EvilGN; 04-09-2010 at 09:05 PM.
EvilGN is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:51 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by FighterHayabusa View Post
There was a study that showed all Americans pay roughly the same amount of overall tax when the dust finally settles - I'll try to find it again and post it.
I'm very interested to see this study. Do you remember what the context was?
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:54 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FighterHayabusa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by jungle View Post
What if only half of us got to use those roads, the half that paid for them?

This means you can't construct a logical argument and you won't step up to the plate and pay your fair share
Let me spell the logic out for you then - a road is something that is built with a regressive tax - like a state sales tax or a gasoline tax - where the people who pay the highest as a percentage of their income for the tax are the working poor.
FighterHayabusa is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:59 PM
  #17  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by FighterHayabusa View Post
Let me spell the logic out for you then - a road is something that is built with a regressive tax - like a state sales tax or a gasoline tax - where the people who pay the highest as a percentage of their income for the tax are the working poor.
I find that interesting. If I make a million dollars and you make 10,000 and we are both taxed at 10%, who pays more?

The sad part is that not only are the higher earners paying more for the exact same benefits, but they contribute far more to the economy and the government.
jungle is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:02 PM
  #18  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by EvilGN View Post
looks like there is a 4th topic that should never be argued....religion, sports, politics, and now taxes.....
There are arguments and there are displays of facts. Not any room for facts in some of those topics. Some can't tolerate the facts in the others.
jungle is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:11 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FighterHayabusa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by jungle View Post
Nobody is saying they are paying nothing, the fact is that redistribution is called that for a reason. Why can't we all pay the same rate? Why are half of us taxed at one level and not the other.
The truth is that there is a near 50/50 split at the political level and the tax system is the primary cause. If I didn't have to pay Federal taxes, why would I care what they were or if they increased to unbearable levels?
You know the answer.
Are you really trying to say the 50/50 split is due to those that pay tax and those that don't? Cause if so, you are seriously underestimating the amount of New England suburbanite liberals in the top 50, and definitely leaving out some white Southern Baptist conservatives that live in single wides and are firmly in the bottom 50. Check again, sir - the highest incomes are in the blue states, and redistribution is mostly from the blue states to the red states.
FighterHayabusa is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:13 PM
  #20  
With The Resistance
Thread Starter
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by EvilGN View Post
looks like there is a 4th topic that should never be argued....religion, sports, politics, and now taxes.....but what the hey

a flat tax may fix most of the fiscal monetary issues for the govt, but IMO its still unfair. the family of 4 making 30k a year probably lives in a home that is 90-100k (using the 3x yearly income rule). So that would allow the dude making 1M a year to live in a 3M house. The dude making 30k pays 3k, so that reduces his mortgage to 80-90k give or take, and millionaire is forced to live in a $2.7M house. Not to mention the yearly requirement to LIVE ie food, healthcare, education etc, its harder for the 30k guy to make ends meet. The millionaire will never go without healthcare, education, milk, booze :P etc. So with a flat income tax, should we make the millionaire pay a proportionately higher amount of money for food? Even if he eats at the most expensive eatery in NYC everyday, he is still doing better than the lower income family.

Funny thing is, I am the furthest person I know from calling my self a bleeding heart liberal, I firmly believe in survival of the fittest when it comes to capitalism. But as an ECON major (who remembers little from college) I have never seen a reason for not having a progressive income tax, while at the same time, flat taxes exists, and even regressive ones. Its the balance between all of them that would make things FAIR. But in our current system which NEEDS to be changed, that rich man still finds ways (thru spending money) to keep from paying his FAIR share
Bottom line is that you think some should be excused from the obligations they have in fact created. Either we all support it together or we all pick another system.
Climb up on that wall and carry a rifle or stay home and cry about the cost.
We are all in this together.
Fair would actually mean dividing the tax bill equally among all of us, and I dare say most of us, the vast majority, could not pay it under any reasonable measure.
jungle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sluggo_63
Cargo
5
11-19-2008 02:13 PM
Tractor Bob
Cargo
85
11-14-2008 12:25 PM
lietuveens
Flight Schools and Training
5
11-11-2008 12:09 PM
Atreyu
Trans States Airlines
67
10-23-2008 07:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices