Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   NetJets (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/netjets/)
-   -   NetJets reduces pilot hiring minimums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/netjets/138404-netjets-reduces-pilot-hiring-minimums.html)

MaxMar 07-08-2022 08:31 AM

NetJets reduces pilot hiring minimums
 
NetJets today announced they reduced their pilot hiring requirements to that of 61.160 for a standard issue ATP and will consider candidates who meet R-ATP requirements. Completing the ATP written is still a requirement prior to attending indoc.

jtf560 07-08-2022 09:46 AM

The company is now ramping up recruitment at the universities with big flight programs in concert with the lowered minimums to try to grab as many qualified pilots as possible before they are all the way on the airline track. I'm sure we will get many pilots from these programs, but I doubt we will be able to hold onto a huge percentage of them very long unless the company offers more money in a new contract. I'm personally hoping for lots of hires followed by lots of rapid departures since this is the only way the company will be willing to come to the bargaining table to improve things for everyone on property- we have at least 5 or 6 years left on the current contract with the extention available to the company. At least this may accelerate the process of hiring/ retention pain for the company.

Pervis 07-08-2022 10:47 AM

Funny how they want to be rid of the older very experienced pilots and continue to lower the bar for new folks.

Myfingershurt 07-08-2022 10:54 AM


Originally Posted by Pervis (Post 3456948)
Funny how they want to be rid of the older very experienced pilots and continue to lower the bar for new folks.

Umm, they’re more expensive. That’s not hard to follow.

Flyfalcons 07-08-2022 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by Pervis (Post 3456948)
Funny how they want to be rid of the older very experienced pilots and continue to lower the bar for new folks.

Folks on international fleets, that are too old to go international, are problematic.

Pervis 07-08-2022 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by Myfingershurt (Post 3456957)
Umm, they’re more expensive. That’s not hard to follow.

How expensive is it when an inexperienced pilot bends metal, much less harms someone? Ever heard the phrase ‘you get what you pay for’?

Pervis 07-08-2022 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Flyfalcons (Post 3456959)
Folks on international fleets, that are too old to go international, are problematic.

There are many countries that fall into the international category that don’t have limitations. It’s not hard to create an algorithm to separate who goes where.

Flyfalcons 07-08-2022 11:15 AM


Originally Posted by Pervis (Post 3456971)
How expensive is it when an inexperienced pilot bends metal, much less harms someone? Ever heard the phrase ‘you get what you pay for’?

'Bout the same as when an experienced pilot bends metal, no?

Pervis 07-08-2022 11:16 AM


Originally Posted by Flyfalcons (Post 3456974)
'Bout the same as when an experienced pilot bends metal, no?

No argument there. However, who is more likely to make the bigger mistake?

Flyfalcons 07-08-2022 11:19 AM


Originally Posted by Pervis (Post 3456976)
No argument there. However, who is more likely to make the bigger mistake?

Hard for an experienced pilot to bend metal when they are too old to legally take the trip. Sorry, old pilots are a drain on what we do. Pilots know this. Management knows this. FDAC knows this. At some point, pilots need to hang up the headset.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:37 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands