![]() |
Originally Posted by mexipilot84
(Post 1441713)
GLH has a spot for ya
|
Originally Posted by sandrich
(Post 1441750)
I wouldn't mind the out station bases if there was a little more cash in the paycheck... Especially since I'm a commuter. The company's wondering how to retain more FOs. While I don't think they would just throw $5k to every FO, why not offer an incentive. Other airlines are offering $5k sign on, requiring 2 year commitment, why don't Silver offer 5k to all FOs and require 1 or 2 more years of service, or just $5/hr across the board...
|
Originally Posted by Propspilot
(Post 1441817)
I cant see them giving a bonus to stay. Too many people will take the money. Then break the contract and leave anyway. Leaving the company to either eat the loss or spend more money to get it back. A little more per hour starting year two would increase retention and be competitive with the other regionals. First year pay is re dic but its the same everywhere. Its year two here that opens your eyes...
|
Anybody have a "A cut above" coupon code that works?
|
The whole thing about the company wanting to meet with the union to discuss ways to improve things is just a delay tactic. It is for this reason that rumors always persist about any given topic. Items are always discussed, but never acted upon. This buys a few months at which time the company calls for a new topic of discussion, but again, nothing will change. If you are new to the airline business, you will recognize this as a positive step. But after a few decades of this, you begin to see nothing is really gained.
If the company truly wishes to address retention issues, they will do what all other non-aviation corporations would do. Find out what industry standard is in all aspects of employee compensation and benefits and move to match those aspects and maybe exceed them thereby creating a new industry standard. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1441886)
The whole thing about the company wanting to meet with the union to discuss ways to improve things is just a delay tactic. It is for this reason that rumors always persist about any given topic. Items are always discussed, but never acted upon. This buys a few months at which time the company calls for a new topic of discussion, but again, nothing will change. If you are new to the airline business, you will recognize this as a positive step. But after a few decades of this, you begin to see nothing is really gained.
If the company truly wishes to address retention issues, they will do what all other non-aviation corporations would do. Find out what industry standard is in all aspects of employee compensation and benefits and move to match those aspects and maybe exceed them thereby creating a new industry standard. |
Originally Posted by tom11011
(Post 1441886)
The whole thing about the company wanting to meet with the union to discuss ways to improve things is just a delay tactic. It is for this reason that rumors always persist about any given topic. Items are always discussed, but never acted upon. This buys a few months at which time the company calls for a new topic of discussion, but again, nothing will change. If you are new to the airline business, you will recognize this as a positive step. But after a few decades of this, you begin to see nothing is really gained.
If the company truly wishes to address retention issues, they will do what all other non-aviation corporations would do. Find out what industry standard is in all aspects of employee compensation and benefits and move to match those aspects and maybe exceed them thereby creating a new industry standard.
Originally Posted by Propspilot
(Post 1441890)
Man... Thats deep...
|
Any word on the staffing bid date? Just curious if anyone has heard anything.
|
Maybe it's a myth...
|
Originally Posted by 200Driver
(Post 1441987)
Any word on the staffing bid date? Just curious if anyone has heard anything.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands