![]() |
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 1513874)
I totally forgot about them I'd say that's a better alternative than what you've listed.
|
Originally Posted by Chrisw
(Post 1513886)
Ok boengsky. Half the people you are getting advice from here quit and went elsewhere but much of what they say is true. The Saab training is severely shortened. Less sim and less ground school time. Nearly half of what others did in the past on the same bird. That being said, it used to be about 10% of people that couldn't get through. Now with the stellar quality of candidate we attract I have heard rumors less than half get through. If you study hard and actually know how to fly IFR, do a V1 cut, ask for checklists, and remember to add power when you get an engine failure or shut one down due to fire, you will be good. It ain't rocket science. It truly is that simple. Something breaks and lights go on and bells go off, "give me the _____________ QRC/QRH please." Then sit back and watch the pilot monitoring flip some switches while Bob(autopilot) flies.
Thank you Chrisw. Thats what I am saying. I know the drill and how to play the game. This really is not rocket science at all. and if pilots that got hired with 400 hours can go through it I am confident that I with 1700 can lol. I will look at Air Wisconsin tho. someone messaged me and said their interview window reopened recently. |
O and so as i am not miss interpreted I am not one of these cocky students right out of flight school. I am 23 years old and the only way I have been able to get to the point i am with my flying, is by learning and listening to pilots that had much more experience than myself, And its because I have been blessed with these great mentors I have the flying skills i have today.
|
Originally Posted by boeingsky
(Post 1513891)
I have talked to commute air. They will not interview me with the RAH experience on my record.
A guy at Colgan in my class did 8 extra sims on the Saab before the CP called him and suggested he voluntarily quit before they took more drastic action. If what you have said is totally true, I contest that you were not failed out of training. Also you need to check into the RAH contract and see what it says about additional training/sim events. Subsequently, the guy who Colgan asked to leave, one year later was hired at RAH and passed 170 training, and he was an absolute joke of a pilot. |
Originally Posted by boeingsky
(Post 1513895)
Thank you Chrisw. Thats what I am saying. I know the drill and how to play the game. This really is not rocket science at all. and if pilots that got hired with 400 hours can go through it I am confident that I with 1700 can lol. I will look at Air Wisconsin tho. someone messaged me and said their interview window reopened recently.
What Chrisw said is valid, but mind you he also went through the 1900 program before Saab, he had a good hand flying foundation down pat before hand and was also indoctrinated in the 121 flying environment before going through transition as did I which helped immensely in the switch to the Saab. You say you are used to flying equipment like the Saab I'm assuming you are correlating the fact that you flew non/partial glass 6 packs and turbo props which is great and a lot more similar than the 170 you started training on but the glass is there to help not hinder so just because this is similar to what you have it's not going to be anymore easier. I think it's more an attitude problem in keeping you back from excelling rather than an actual deficiency in skills many of us have been there done that in regards to that department as have I fix that first and you'll have a chance at passing training. |
Originally Posted by Temocil27
(Post 1512863)
I could tell everyone here
|
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 1513934)
What Chrisw said is valid, but mind you he also went through the 1900 program before Saab, he had a good hand flying foundation down pat before hand and was also indoctrinated in the 121 flying environment before going through transition as did I which helped immensely in the switch to the Saab. |
Originally Posted by Cruz5350
(Post 1513934)
Ok I might be harsh here but follow along. If you know the drill and it's not rocket science how come with all your hours you didn't make it through RAH on a much easier plane to fly? Everybody learns at different paces as we all know but you're trying to imply that because you have 1700 hours (not many at all) grew up in aviation got your Private early on and flew in the NE not sunny FL you're somehow better than 400hr guys? Mind you many 400hr guys made it through RAH's and other more difficult programs but with all your experience you didn't.... .
You call 170 a much easier airplane and yet you couldn't cut it through on a Cessna 152. IIRC, you I remember you struggling to get a job once. Be a little humble and never forget where YOU came from. |
Originally Posted by SlowATRDriver
(Post 1514037)
This is coming from a guy that failed 4 check rides. I understand you made it through Silver training and now you are working at a "mainline", so that's where you are attitude comes from.
You call 170 a much easier airplane and yet you couldn't cut it through on a Cessna 152. IIRC, you I remember you struggling to get a job once. Be a little humble and never forget where YOU came from. |
Originally Posted by SlowATRDriver
(Post 1514037)
This is coming from a guy that failed 4 check rides. I understand you made it through Silver training and now you are working at a "mainline", so that's where you are attitude comes from.
You call 170 a much easier airplane and yet you couldn't cut it through on a Cessna 152. IIRC, you I remember you struggling to get a job once. Be a little humble and never forget where YOU came from. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands