Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Other
Should I leave ZW for PDT or Commutair? >

Should I leave ZW for PDT or Commutair?

Search
Notices
Other Regional Airlines

Should I leave ZW for PDT or Commutair?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2016, 07:23 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 841
Default

I would agree with that as well.
pitchtrim is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 07:59 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Realtalk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 391
Default

Originally Posted by MKUltra View Post
Hey I like all you awac guys and have had some great conversations with you guys and girls in the Phl crew room. I have a large amount of respect.

What I don't know, if pdt can staff all the flying that is expected of us. There just isn't enough pilots and our training dept need some steroids to get to this thing up to "800" pilots. PDT has a lot of senior guys close to retirement or who are having medical issues. We are losing people to other carriers and cargo operators. That's only going to exasperate staffing, but movement will be rapid.

AWAC is an established pilot group and equipment that is valuable in this market. I hope they stay strong and demand a high price for their service. I am sure Delta wishes they had their services now. This only raises the bar for each and everyone of us in our wallet for being a professional pilot.

I honestly can't see pdt or any of the wholly owns to be successful in growth right now unless they raise the amount of compensation in order to attract pilots in order to staff the regional lift they have.

I also don't see the 50 seat lift going anywhere, but what do I know, I push buttons and pull levers.
Somebody buy this guy a drink
Realtalk is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 08:04 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: PNF
Posts: 622
Default

Exacerbate ...
yimke is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 08:07 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by MKUltra View Post
Hey I like all you awac guys and have had some great conversations with you guys and girls in the Phl crew room. I have a large amount of respect.

What I don't know, if pdt can staff all the flying that is expected of us. There just isn't enough pilots and our training dept need some steroids to get to this thing up to "800" pilots. PDT has a lot of senior guys close to retirement or who are having medical issues. We are losing people to other carriers and cargo operators. That's only going to exasperate staffing, but movement will be rapid.

AWAC is an established pilot group and equipment that is valuable in this market. I hope they stay strong and demand a high price for their service. I am sure Delta wishes they had their services now. This only raises the bar for each and everyone of us in our wallet for being a professional pilot.

I honestly can't see pdt or any of the wholly owns to be successful in growth right now unless they raise the amount of compensation in order to attract pilots in order to staff the regional lift they have.

I also don't see the 50 seat lift going anywhere, but what do I know, I push buttons and pull levers.
Let's see. First you're correct that AWAC is good pilot group. They been around for a long time and have also been a solid performer just like a few other airlines out there.

I do agree it will be a big challenge for Piedmont to double in size with a new fleet and a flow that keeps taking experienced pilots each month. Instructors included in those leaving will also hurt. Remember once they get someone to become a instructor they are gone in 1 or 2 years.
That being said they are filling classes with other 121 airline pilots now and will soon use people from other RJ carriers to become instructors. Kinda like how PSA used former Comair pilots to help in there training.

Yes AWAC is an established group but it's funny when you say, "I'm sure Delta wishes it had its services now." What makes you say that? All Delta has to do is pick up the phone and work out a deal if they wanted to right? So far AWAC doesn't have a partner and I'm sure they'd love to work out a deal with Delta or United (however two bad experiences with United might have already ended any future deals there). Plus I'm sure any new deal will have to come with a new fixed cost. That road was tried once and didn't work out.

So you think a contract carrier is safer then a Wo'ed in this environment? The 3 Wo's at American will only be as successful as Parker wants them. American has tons of cash to throw at any of them. Being backed by the largest airline in the world isn't a bad deal in this market.

50 seat aircraft are less likely at United and Delta then American. Delta just ordered 190's and are looking at taking more flying back within the mainline operation. United is also looking at a big order of 190's to keep the flying. This is a win win for all the regionals as more mainline jobs will open up.

I think the future will be bright for everyone soon.
billyho is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 09:11 PM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
Let's see. First you're correct that AWAC is good pilot group. They been around for a long time and have also been a solid performer just like a few other airlines out there.

I do agree it will be a big challenge for Piedmont to double in size with a new fleet and a flow that keeps taking experienced pilots each month. Instructors included in those leaving will also hurt. Remember once they get someone to become a instructor they are gone in 1 or 2 years.
That being said they are filling classes with other 121 airline pilots now and will soon use people from other RJ carriers to become instructors. Kinda like how PSA used former Comair pilots to help in there training.

Yes AWAC is an established group but it's funny when you say, "I'm sure Delta wishes it had its services now." What makes you say that? All Delta has to do is pick up the phone and work out a deal if they wanted to right? So far AWAC doesn't have a partner and I'm sure they'd love to work out a deal with Delta or United (however two bad experiences with United might have already ended any future deals there). Plus I'm sure any new deal will have to come with a new fixed cost. That road was tried once and didn't work out.

So you think a contract carrier is safer then a Wo'ed in this environment? The 3 Wo's at American will only be as successful as Parker wants them. American has tons of cash to throw at any of them. Being backed by the largest airline in the world isn't a bad deal in this market.

50 seat aircraft are less likely at United and Delta then American. Delta just ordered 190's and are looking at taking more flying back within the mainline operation. United is also looking at a big order of 190's to keep the flying. This is a win win for all the regionals as more mainline jobs will open up.

I think the future will be bright for everyone soon.
If Parker has so much cash to throw at his Wo's, why are they still some of the lowest paid in the industry? He could just pick up the phone and change all that... Sorry but I'm not buying what you're selling. Your arguments are very carefully one-sided.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 02-05-2016, 09:57 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by sweetholyjesus View Post
If Parker has so much cash to throw at his Wo's, why are they still some of the lowest paid in the industry? He could just pick up the phone and change all that... Sorry but I'm not buying what you're selling. Your arguments are very carefully one-sided.
It's easy to answer. It's because we are now cheaper then the contract carriers. It's the only reason the WO's are growing. If the WO's can do the flying cheaper it's a win win for American.
Believe me if he needs to throw more money at them he will.

Why don't you think AWAC didn't get locked into a long term deal? I bet you it was because of cost.

It Is what it is. How is the argument one-sided?
billyho is offline  
Old 02-06-2016, 03:16 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,066
Default

Originally Posted by billyho View Post
It's easy to answer. It's because we are now cheaper then the contract carriers. It's the only reason the WO's are growing. If the WO's can do the flying cheaper it's a win win for American.
Believe me if he needs to throw more money at them he will.

Why don't you think AWAC didn't get locked into a long term deal? I bet you it was because of cost.

It Is what it is. How is the argument one-sided?
But you're not cheaper. Contract carriers like TSA is cheaper because their seniority list is super junior and their administrative infrastructure is bare bones.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 02-06-2016, 04:04 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChipChelios's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 599
Default

what am I reading...? ...a transcript of the View? Bunch of old ladies bickering. Now I understand why China censors those who speak out. If I was a moderator I would censor 90% of you for speaking blasphemy lol
ChipChelios is offline  
Old 02-06-2016, 07:08 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by ChipChelios View Post
what am I reading...? ...a transcript of the View? Bunch of old ladies bickering. Now I understand why China censors those who speak out. If I was a moderator I would censor 90% of you for speaking blasphemy lol
Nothing wrong with friendly discussion. Just because people disagree doesn't mean it's "bickering" but hopefully this is somewhat on topic..

billy being cheapest only works if you can staff. Imho it seems like they'd rather hire us to cover what can't be staffed than pay the WOs more to cover it themselves. AA will fly them as cheap as they can for as long as they can. I assume the bottom line is better for them this way. With all the staffing difficulties out there I'd dare to say ZW won't have trouble finding work for quite a while. Hopefully they'll find something and decide to announce it before Jan 2018....
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 02-06-2016, 07:53 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
But you're not cheaper. Contract carriers like TSA is cheaper because their seniority list is super junior and their administrative infrastructure is bare bones.
LOL, do you serious know what you're talking about? You do realize that was the major reason for the flow thru right? Envoy/Piedmont/PSA will continue to be junior airlines. The flow will continue to keep the senior list junior. Parker even said, "We want you to spend no more then 8 years at our WO and then go to mainline."

Do you honestly believe if the contract carriers were cheaper today that Parker wouldn't have gone with them? That's the reason Envoy went through it's hell in getting the cost structure to compete with other 175 operators.

If I'm not mistaken I think United bought into the CommutAir. It's to the point now that the Majors are switching to bringing more of the flying in house.

And this will be a good thing for EVERYONE.
billyho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dave Behnke
Cargo
109
08-27-2014 01:45 PM
turboprop87
Regional
17
08-13-2014 05:49 PM
PRS Guitars
American
2
05-16-2014 03:22 PM
hummingbear
Foreign
79
06-12-2010 05:56 PM
Sniper
Major
6
04-18-2009 06:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices