Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Cutter Flight Management SIC Position >

Cutter Flight Management SIC Position

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Cutter Flight Management SIC Position

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2024, 09:12 PM
  #11  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Default

Originally Posted by BustedGear View Post
Whatever man, the OP is looking at a Part 91 job, i'm done replying
It might have been nice if you'd contributed to the discussion in some meaningful way before you left. Dont' forget to look into that reading comprehension problem. You'll be glad you did.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 01-20-2024, 11:04 PM
  #12  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,088
Default

We were all in your shoes once, well most of us anyway.
As a CFI I’ve been offered right seat in a KingAir 90 and in a Mitsubishi.
Politely declined as it was a sketchy operation under Part 91 subpart K.
I’d make a phone call to the local FSDO and pay them a visit with a list of questions and take some names.
On this date ASI so and so told me this.
Then go from there.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 01-21-2024, 10:22 AM
  #13  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 8
Default

Hi everyone! I was busy instructing yesterday so I didn't see the responses until now. I much appreciate everyones input! As great as it would be to fly a jet, that's not really the reason I was looking at this job. My main idea was getting multi time since I'm so low and instead of renting another 13 hours to get to the min 25, I thought a full time job might do it better. However, after reading the responses and doing some more in-depth research, I've decided to look elsewhere. It appears right now to be one of those too good to be true positions, and when I'm looking for a job that could later on down the line get me investigated my the FAA on legal hour logging, I'd much rather pass. I've since started looking more at PlaneSense. They have a more established SIC program where I can still get turbine time, be based in PHX, and if I like it and stay long enough, get my multi time on a PC24.

The main goal in all of this is that I don't want to apply to the airlines as just another CFII with 1500 hours and 25 multi. I want my resume to standout and help my chances the best I can. If that means I pass on a multi turbine job because it's a little sketchy and instead add at least 750turbine and 250PIC turbine to my resume, maybe that elongates the path to the airlines, but my resume will look a lot better than an CFII straight outta the traffic pattern will!
Flyboy31 is offline  
Old 01-21-2024, 12:52 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
QRH Bingo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 562
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy31 View Post
Hi everyone! I was busy instructing yesterday so I didn't see the responses until now. I much appreciate everyones input! As great as it would be to fly a jet, that's not really the reason I was looking at this job. My main idea was getting multi time since I'm so low and instead of renting another 13 hours to get to the min 25, I thought a full time job might do it better. . . . get turbine time, be based in PHX, . . .
Have you looked at Ameriflight? They have an established SIC program because they operate aircraft requiring 2 crew out of PHX. While it can be hit or miss for a street-hire FO, it is possible. If it's experience you're looking for, while building multi time, it would fit the bill.
QRH Bingo is offline  
Old 01-21-2024, 01:45 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Ameriflight may be the best avenue to achieve your goal to reach the 25 hour of multi engine time between PIC and SIC. I believe having a CFI will give you a better chance of being hired, proivided you have your MEI. I haven't read your entire original first post.

Good luck and all the best.
captjns is offline  
Old 01-21-2024, 02:29 PM
  #16  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2023
Posts: 8
Default

I have looked at Ameriflight and would go to them rather quickly, however, even with my CFII, I've heard that they stoped hiring FO's recently from the street due to them currently having sim issues during training. Rumor is most of their FO's now come from the UPS cadet program. I sent an email a few weeks back to what I believe was the pilot hiring email for them, but never got a response. Their website also appears to only have positions for captains at the moment. If I'm misinformed please let me know!
Flyboy31 is offline  
Old 01-21-2024, 04:13 PM
  #17  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 17
Default

Ameriflight does indeed street-hire FOs, and has a hard requirement for CFI/II prior to 1,200 hours. They do not post the positions, and your first stop will be corresponding with Zeke Zeitak, who mans the [email protected] email address. Follow their social media for semi-frequent updates on what they're up to. Zeke himself has put out a number videos on what they're looking for.

The CFMI position isn't about fluffing your pilot resume for the airlines - though experience like that may have a positive effect on an airline application if and when the time comes. Gaining exposure and experience in three wildly common and popular business aviation platforms, becoming a great internal candidate for when they need to staff PICs in those platforms, and becoming experienced in 91/135 ops in this system is the reason one takes a position like this. It's never going to be the fastest time builder to 1,500, and involves entirely too much work and commitment simply to avoid paying another $5,000 to build to regional airline mins for multi time.

Even sniffing any seat on a turboprop or turbojet was once a 2,000 - 3,000 hour cost of entry. People literally paid "airlines" to gain this kind of exposure and experience. Know your history, and understand how quickly it can swing back this direction when the music pauses.

Right seaters are increasingly a requirement in business-class aircraft ops - for both insurance as well as customer optics purposes. As you may be cynical about what they offer you (describing a turboprop/jet role at a -95 year old- company as "sketchy"), consider what you offer -them- at this stage of your career. They will have to literally teach you -everything- about these aircraft for you to be a useful SIC or support pilot. An empty vessel (as we all were once), should not over-estimate its worth.

In a role like this, you will fly hours you can't log. It's part of paying your dues, and it's not for everybody. As you establish yourself as a reliable, useful, and productive employee, you may see your role (and correspondingly, your opportunities) expand. PC12 pilots are in strong demand, HondaJet pilots enjoy great salaries, and PC24 contract pilots command $2-5K day rates.

Planesense offers good opportunities for piston-background pilots, but doesn't hire much below 1,000 hours. PC24 upgrades currently sit at around 4 years...so good luck with parlaying that into your other 13 hours of multi for the airlines.

Business aviation had absolutely been raided by the airlines. This is the reason you see multiple, hard to fill turbojet vacancies (which usually require ATP-min level hours for insurance) across the 135 spectrum. When the music slows at the airlines (and/or the hiring goes back to super-competitive), these vacancies will evaporate as pilots "hold what they got."
Azpilot06 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RJSAviator76
Southwest
238
08-24-2022 07:53 PM
j3cub
Allegiant
6367
12-20-2020 08:01 AM
takingmessages
Flight Schools and Training
8
07-07-2018 11:11 PM
Dave Behnke
Cargo
109
08-27-2014 01:45 PM
dl773
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-17-2014 03:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices