Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Piedmont Airlines
Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont? >

Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont?

Search
Notices
Piedmont Airlines Regional Airline

Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2018, 02:49 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont?

If a pilot sought a career with American as their destination/career airline, is Piedmont - as American's wholly-owned carrier - the worst possible regional they could work for?

My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??

I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 01-25-2018, 03:17 PM
  #2  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,270
Default

People have been hired outside of the flow from all 3 wholly owned carriers.
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 01-25-2018, 06:58 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Posts: 1,191
Default

Right now we have captains making more money than some of the current population of mainline pilots. So that theory is flawed....

Regional airlines are going to contract and consolidate.... the regional airline business model was a necessity of the post 911 world. The great recession of 2008 allowed regional flying to flourish as the mainline carriers contracted and consolidated.

Now in the global society with emerging markets exploding, the regional airline model isn't making sense. There isn't much of a need for e145s or crj200s now. Many 50 seat routes are being served by larger aircraft with less flights...
MKUltra is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 05:59 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
Default

Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
If a pilot sought a career with American as their destination/career airline, is Piedmont - as American's wholly-owned carrier - the worst possible regional they could work for?

My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??

I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
Can't find any flaws in this argument. The regional airline with people getting a no-interview job at AA after about 5 years is the worst place to be, if you want to be an AA pilot... yep
MantisToboggan is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 12:22 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by MantisToboggan View Post
Can't find any flaws in this argument. The regional airline with people getting a no-interview job at AA after about 5 years is the worst place to be, if you want to be an AA pilot... yep
MantisToboggan, it's late so perhaps my overall SA/togetherness is getting me here, but are you saying that Piedmont is the worst place to be (given 5 year flow) with your tongue firmly lodging in check? Or genuinely agreeing with my original post/theory? For what it's worth, I won't be with a regional for roughly 18-24 months and I'll be in my early 40's at that point - will Piedmont's flow time to mainline likely increase or decrease by then?

Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
fenix1 is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 03:39 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: DHC-8 CA
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
MantisToboggan, it's late so perhaps my overall SA/togetherness is getting me here, but are you saying that Piedmont is the worst place to be (given 5 year flow) with your tongue firmly lodging in check? Or genuinely agreeing with my original post/theory? For what it's worth, I won't be with a regional for roughly 18-24 months and I'll be in my early 40's at that point - will Piedmont's flow time to mainline likely increase or decrease by then?

Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
It's tongue in cheek. It's hard not to be bemused by the cacophony of bad advise that new aviators are given about the regional business. I still have friends from my flight instructor days flying air ambulance and on-demand charter because they think they have better QOL than me, a lowly regional pilot. It's funny and sad.
Theaveragejoker is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 06:11 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilot0987's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 505
Default

You have started multiple threads about this with different company names. I think one would give you all the advice you need.
pilot0987 is offline  
Old 01-28-2018, 01:46 PM
  #8  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by pilot0987 View Post
You have started multiple threads about this with different company names. I think one would give you all the advice you need.
I want to work for AA, so I guess taking a position with a company that has a direct defined path would be the least obvious choice. I should go to Mesa right? There’s that reverse psychology stuff at work on them there recruiters. I’m gonna trick them you watch!!
PDTFlyer is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 09:42 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
Default

Originally Posted by fenix1 View Post
MantisToboggan, it's late so perhaps my overall SA/togetherness is getting me here, but are you saying that Piedmont is the worst place to be (given 5 year flow) with your tongue firmly lodging in check? Or genuinely agreeing with my original post/theory? For what it's worth, I won't be with a regional for roughly 18-24 months and I'll be in my early 40's at that point - will Piedmont's flow time to mainline likely increase or decrease by then?

Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
Congrats on figuring out I was being facetious. Well, kind of. You did have to have someone point it out. Whatever, facts are beside the point here.

Look at the class breakdown at AA, and you'll answer your own questions
MantisToboggan is offline  
Old 01-30-2018, 07:03 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 92
Default

Troll. A job at Piedmont is a guaranteed job at American. If you want to try to get to a legacy faster, do it while building seniority at Piedmont. Win -win
PiedmontFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Typhoonpilot
Major
2
08-03-2017 11:30 AM
samballs
Regional
340
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
Tsuda
Major
4
10-20-2010 07:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices