Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont?
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Goal: American...fly anywhere but Piedmont?
If a pilot sought a career with American as their destination/career airline, is Piedmont - as American's wholly-owned carrier - the worst possible regional they could work for?
My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??
I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??
I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: Professional Eugoogoolizer at the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can’t Read Good
Posts: 1,191
Right now we have captains making more money than some of the current population of mainline pilots. So that theory is flawed....
Regional airlines are going to contract and consolidate.... the regional airline business model was a necessity of the post 911 world. The great recession of 2008 allowed regional flying to flourish as the mainline carriers contracted and consolidated.
Now in the global society with emerging markets exploding, the regional airline model isn't making sense. There isn't much of a need for e145s or crj200s now. Many 50 seat routes are being served by larger aircraft with less flights...
Regional airlines are going to contract and consolidate.... the regional airline business model was a necessity of the post 911 world. The great recession of 2008 allowed regional flying to flourish as the mainline carriers contracted and consolidated.
Now in the global society with emerging markets exploding, the regional airline model isn't making sense. There isn't much of a need for e145s or crj200s now. Many 50 seat routes are being served by larger aircraft with less flights...
#4
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
If a pilot sought a career with American as their destination/career airline, is Piedmont - as American's wholly-owned carrier - the worst possible regional they could work for?
My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??
I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
My theory is that the progressively-deepening pilot shortage is driving the major/legacy airlines to create "systems" in which they can manage the pilots (i.e., balance between regional & mainline) as they see fit to do as much cheap flying as possible, so - in flow/agreement scenarios with a wholly-owned regional - pilots who are part of the wholly-owned regional won't get to the mainline carrier as fast as they would by applying from outside the "system." Thoughts??
I have no Part 121 experience so I would love nothing more than for the folks who have done some turns to correct me if this is a bad/incorrect way of thinking.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 385
Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: DHC-8 CA
Posts: 462
MantisToboggan, it's late so perhaps my overall SA/togetherness is getting me here, but are you saying that Piedmont is the worst place to be (given 5 year flow) with your tongue firmly lodging in check? Or genuinely agreeing with my original post/theory? For what it's worth, I won't be with a regional for roughly 18-24 months and I'll be in my early 40's at that point - will Piedmont's flow time to mainline likely increase or decrease by then?
Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
#8
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 616
I want to work for AA, so I guess taking a position with a company that has a direct defined path would be the least obvious choice. I should go to Mesa right? There’s that reverse psychology stuff at work on them there recruiters. I’m gonna trick them you watch!!
#9
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
MantisToboggan, it's late so perhaps my overall SA/togetherness is getting me here, but are you saying that Piedmont is the worst place to be (given 5 year flow) with your tongue firmly lodging in check? Or genuinely agreeing with my original post/theory? For what it's worth, I won't be with a regional for roughly 18-24 months and I'll be in my early 40's at that point - will Piedmont's flow time to mainline likely increase or decrease by then?
Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
Thanks to all for weighing in with thoughts/perspective.
Look at the class breakdown at AA, and you'll answer your own questions
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post