![]() |
Don’t Come To PDT
Interviewed in January. I still have not started sims. I won’t be on the line till mid to late November (hopefully!!!). Upgrade is realistically 3 years total because you don’t fly your first year, you sit on min pay at home the whole time. Make less money your second year than you do the first... wish I would have went somewhere else...
|
What’s keeping you from leaving then?
|
Prob already spent the bonus money and can’t pay it back😂
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2688868)
What’s keeping you from leaving then?
|
Originally Posted by Brokeasspot
(Post 2688870)
Prob already spent the bonus money and can’t pay it back😂
|
Originally Posted by BluePandaBoy
(Post 2688872)
I think I’ll be going to sims soon hopefully. I’m saying if I could go back to January I wouldn’t have interviewed here. At most other airlines I would have been flying for 4-6 months by now, accruing flight time. Prolly better pay and more days off as well..
So, from here forward, are you better off staying with Piedmont, or going somewhere else? I'm not saying you should or shouldn't leave, but don't let sunk cost taint your decision. FWIW, it took three months to get from the start of my first sim session to completion of OE and (finally) a line pilot. That was all training delays. My sim partner and I passed every lesson and ride on the first try, and completed OE at the minimum required hours. So, even though you've been on the Piedmont payroll for half a year, your quickest route to being a line pilot is probably still not Piedmont. Pathetic, isn't it? |
Originally Posted by BluePandaBoy
(Post 2688860)
Interviewed in January. I still have not started sims. I won’t be on the line till mid to late November (hopefully!!!). Upgrade is realistically 3 years total because you don’t fly your first year, you sit on min pay at home the whole time. Make less money your second year than you do the first... wish I would have went somewhere else...
Things are far from perfect at PDT, but laying out a vague timeline to imply that new hires will be sitting around for 11 months as a paid employee before they even start sims and won’t see a plane for over a year after indoc is a bit disingenuous. Upgrade eligibility for new hires is forecast to be 27-30 months using 9-12 months from indoc to OE completion and averaging 55hrs a month until 1000hrs with the company. Actual upgrade times are quicker or slower in some cases depending on background and amount of flight time at PDT. As far as not interviewing back in January... it wasn’t a secret that there were training delays and folks were taking 4-5 months to get from Indic to ground school back then. Sorry you didn’t do your research on the company beforehand, but I doubt you’d have found another company giving you 30 days off for several months with pay and your probation clock running as a new hire. If you’re miserable at PDT, no one would fault you for leaving. Definitely recommend finishing OE and completing your probation period first so it doesn’t look like you couldn’t hack it/ resigned in leu of termination. If you decide to stay, make sure to vote no on any TAs that you don’t find acceptable. |
I don't fault people for making the decisions they do. Remember the recruiting department is responsible for getting people in the door. They know the buzz words to convince people to come here.
Remember... we have immediate upgrade.. 2.5 year to 3 years if your a zero time guy or gal.. No longer we have the quickest flow.. We have the lowest pay of the regionals now.. We have the worst, least inefficient schedules that credit the the lowest in the industry. You will give 4 days of your life to make 16 hours credit... for first officers that is less than 640 dollars a trip. For captains that is approximately 1000 dollars a trip. You will work 20 days a month and get 75 hours credit a month. That is 3000 dollars a month. As an fo.. after deductions that's about 2000 dollars a month. Yes there are bonuses and bonuses can be taken away at any time... ask people here at year 3 at min fo pay trying to upgrade.. they will make approximately 30k the year they upgrade as there is no more bonus to help them supplement min pay. I'm not trying to be negative about this company but just honest. |
Originally Posted by BluePandaBoy
(Post 2688873)
You have to when your only making minimums for 11 months...
|
Sitting at home getting paid; not ideal for advancing your aviation credentials but what an opportunity! I hope you’ve been making money on the side and using your AA travel benefits to the max.
Having said this I do understand your frustration. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2688988)
As little as 5 years ago people survived just fine without the bonuses and in even lower hourly rates. BTW I think Trans States or GOJet will buy out your contract if you want to go.
|
Then he should let GoJet buy out his contract and move on instead of complaining on Internet forums about problems that are all ready well talked about.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2688868)
What’s keeping you from leaving then?
|
Originally Posted by mfflyer
(Post 2689028)
I was told by PDT (or maybe envoy..can't remember..) that leaving after starting systems would count as a 121 failure on your record. I was hired in May and left in August while I had the chance. Its been night and day better since...but that's only because of my specific situation (no kids, no restrictions on where to live, young etc etc). Piedmont has a great pilot group so I hope those that do stay and stick it out fight for what they deserve. I know a particular captain JG who is running for CA Rep in PHL, and I really think its time for that pilot group to get involved in some sort of union reform and get some real people with the right idea at the table.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2689049)
The only Rep to vote against even bothering to release the TA to the pilot group because it was concessionarry in nature was the current PHL CA Rep. Unfortunately for the pilot group, he’s leaving soon.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2689015)
Then he should let GoJet buy out his contract and move on instead of complaining on Internet forums about problems that are all ready well talked about.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2689049)
The only Rep to vote against even bothering to release the TA to the pilot group because it was concessionarry in nature was the current PHL CA Rep. Unfortunately for the pilot group, he’s leaving soon.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2688988)
As little as 5 years ago people survived just fine without the bonuses and in even lower hourly rates. BTW I think Trans States or GOJet will buy out your contract if you want to go.
You flown the line yet? |
I have also thought about leaving for another regional with a DEC program, LCC, or ACMI. The thing holding me back is my number 1 and 2 choices are known for hiring captains and check airmen/instructors. I don't like the idea of starting over and losing the flow (just in case I need it) and seniority. At least PDT has constant movement and multiple opportunities to become an instructor or do something else in training. This isn't as easy at some of the other regionals.
|
Originally Posted by 123494
(Post 2689355)
I have also thought about leaving for another regional with a DEC program, LCC, or ACMI. The thing holding me back is my number 1 and 2 choices are known for hiring captains and check airmen/instructors. I don't like the idea of starting over and losing the flow (just in case I need it) and seniority. At least PDT has constant movement and multiple opportunities to become an instructor or do something else in training. This isn't as easy at some of the other regionals.
No sense in living like this. Piedmont serves a purpose but it’s not a long term solution anymore. Honestly I don’t have a lot of faith of this place even existing long enough for my flow date to come up. It’s looking like 7 more years for me as it is. Management here thinks we’re spoiled and entitled, but the truth of it is, the “we have the flow” card is becoming less and less of a draw. Others in the industry are spending money and time to help make the QOL better. We would be doing ourselves a disservice by not trying to put ourselves in the best possible career possible. |
Originally Posted by MantisToboggan
(Post 2689337)
Ahhhh, guys did it in the passed. Let's accept it today then! Go kick rocks dude. Seriously. I started at this exact company making $27 an hour. We were the lowest paid regional then, and guess what? I'll say it again, nothing changes. "Same as it ever was".
You flown the line yet? |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2689416)
Kicking rocks sounds like it would hurt my toes.
“After we came out of the church, we stood talking for some time together of Bishop Berkeley’s ingenious sophistry to prove the non-existence of matter, and that every thing in the universe is merely ideal. I observed, that though we are satisfied his doctrine is not true, it is impossible to refute it. I never shall forget the alacrity with which Johnson answered, striking his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it, ‘I refute it thus.'” (Boswell’s Life of Samuel Johnson) |
So are the both the company and the union going back to the table to try and better this place? Does anyone know what’s going on? Always seems like things are super secretive and hush-hush and all we have to go on are the rumors we hear on the line.
|
Originally Posted by CharlieFoxtrot
(Post 2689600)
So are the both the company and the union going back to the table to try and better this place? Does anyone know what’s going on? Always seems like things are super secretive and hush-hush and all we have to go on are the rumors we hear on the line.
As far as the “secretive” part, that’s probably something to blame the company for. From what I understand non-disclosure agreements lets them play their 4d chess they love so much. |
Originally Posted by CharlieFoxtrot
(Post 2689600)
So are the both the company and the union going back to the table to try and better this place? Does anyone know what’s going on? Always seems like things are super secretive and hush-hush and all we have to go on are the rumors we hear on the line.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2689706)
Welcome to the world or airline negotiations. Not sure who’s more to blame ALPA or the company. However it’s mostly the same industry wide.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2689710)
At PDT Union leadership and management are closely aligned...It was pretty bad during the TA roadshows that line pilots weren’t sure if they were getting the sales pitch from folks who negotiated on behalf of the union or behalf of the company and had to stop the individual talking to ask for clarification.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2689710)
At PDT Union leadership and management are closely aligned...It was pretty bad during the TA roadshows that line pilots weren’t sure if they were getting the sales pitch from folks who negotiated on behalf of the union or behalf of the company and had to stop the individual talking to ask for clarification.
|
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 2689710)
At PDT Union leadership and management are closely aligned...It was pretty bad during the TA roadshows that line pilots weren’t sure if they were getting the sales pitch from folks who negotiated on behalf of the union or behalf of the company and had to stop the individual talking to ask for clarification.
I don’t think anyone from the Union is on the take, but this management is extremely hostile. We are stuck in the AA WO whipsaw and everything you see is a byproduct of that. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689751)
I do not agree with that. I feel like the Union was simply being informative about the proposed changes and weren't trying sell anything.
Honestly, I was incredibly disappointed that they were the ones representing the pilot group. They shouldn't have been there dismissing concerns, they should have been giving us the solutions that they developed because they saw those same weaknesses and took steps to mitigate them. If you had interspersed management in to the panel, you wouldn't have been able to tell which ones were the union and which ones were the company trying to defend and sell the TA. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689751)
I do not agree with that. I feel like the Union was simply being informative about the proposed changes and weren't trying sell anything.
I don’t think anyone from the Union is on the take, but this management is extremely hostile. We are stuck in the AA WO whipsaw and everything you see is a byproduct of that. |
Originally Posted by PDTFlyer
(Post 2689780)
Need to clean the slate within the Union. Can’t get rid of MK but we can change things on our side of the table.
|
Originally Posted by 67Creek
(Post 2689757)
"Well the intent of that is..." "Well, technically that could happen, but the company won't do that because staffing levels will improve."
Honestly, I was incredibly disappointed that they were the ones representing the pilot group. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689785)
BL for MEC Chair
|
Originally Posted by MantisToboggan
(Post 2689812)
Exactly how we ended up with our current contract
|
Originally Posted by PDTFlyer
(Post 2689817)
Have we seen any actual significant change with him involved? Lots of “looking into it” but still 11 days off, less commutable lines, and he supported the TA. Sorry I don’t agree.
Do not confuse critical staffing levels with lack of effort on his part. If there’s anyone in the Union that deserves praise, it’s BL. Why wouldn’t he support the TA, he’s part of the Union and the negotiated terms greatly expanded language determining the Scheduling Committees role in schedule building. Why would he openly be a no vote? |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689821)
Yes we have. Statistically the movement towards a 45 minute report time created many more opportunities for line development. Also, he was able to finally get access to SABRE and S3RUS which allows him to run scheduling scenarios which are hopefully going to lead to much better things going forward. Did you not see the newsletter outlining all the new schedule types for the October bid? That was super awesome for once.
Do not confuse critical staffing levels with lack of effort on his part. If there’s anyone in the Union that deserves praise, it’s BL. Why wouldn’t he support the TA, he’s part of the Union and the negotiated terms greatly expanded language determining the Scheduling Committees role in schedule building. Why would he openly be a no vote? He is absolutely trying to make change and he is one of the few in the Union I can say are in the position they should be in. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689821)
Yes we have. Statistically the movement towards a 45 minute report time created many more opportunities for line development. Also, he was able to finally get access to the scheduling software which allows him to run scheduling scenarios which are hopefully going to lead to much better things going forward. Did you not see the newsletter outlining all the new schedule types for the October bid? That was super awesome for once.
Do not confuse critical staffing levels with lack of effort on his part. If there’s anyone in the Union that deserves praise, it’s BL. Why wouldn’t he support the TA, he’s part of the Union and the negotiated terms greatly expanded language determining the Scheduling Committees role in schedule building. Why would he openly be a no vote? Hey let's see those "statistics". Or is this hyperbole? To answer your question, because IT SUCKED |
Originally Posted by MantisToboggan
(Post 2689832)
Hey let's see those "statistics". Or is this hyperbole?
To answer your question, because IT SUCKED It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that spending less time doing BS duty and more time doing flying duty leads to more efficient schedules though. The company wanted the 1 hour show to help their precious on time statistics, we as a pilot group have done everything to hurt that after the 45 minute show rule - hence the emails from both the company and union. I know it’s a shocker, but some things can benefit both parties. BL is doing the right things for the pilot group despite an extremely uphill battle. If you guys really feel different you should volunteer, because it’s not as easy of work as you could imagine from your armchair. |
Originally Posted by Newstick189
(Post 2689840)
Hyperbole.
If you guys really feel different you should volunteer That in no way effects my right to express my opinion on the union and what they are doing. What are you doing when you volunteer time to the union? Does representing pilots ring a bell? How are we to be represented if we aren't allowed to express our opinion? Your right to explain how you feel about the way things are going is in no way linked to your volunteer record. End of story. Maybe the union only feels it represents those who do volunteer? And it attracts a certain kind of person? And maybe that echo chamber is why the union deemed it appropriate to put forth a vote on a concessionary contract that the pilot group replied to with a resounding "NO". Just spitballing here. But maybe I'm on to something. The union is representative of the pilot group as a whole. If people truly believe that if you don't volunteer you don't have a say? Then man, are we in trouble. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands