You are correct. Physical issues are generally easy. Mental not so much.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2665818)
Maybe, maybe not.
He may well have a serious back problem, and be entitled to disability. He might have just lied to the FAA. Each specific case could be different, and each would have to be addressed on it's own merits. But I suspect the government is operating on the assumption (reasonable in court) that the VA disabilities were diagnosed by medical professionals and are thus real... hence lying to the FAA is the charge. It's easy to prosecute someone who checked "no" on the FAA form, but is cashing a monthly check from the VA. Harder to disprove a claimed disability beyond a reasonable doubt in court. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2666156)
Bold type added. Apparently this has been going on to a greater or lesser degree for five years.
This seems to be the testimony to Congress that lead to the requirement to reveal all disability payments being added to the FAA medical history: https://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/defaul...ony_july17.pdf GF |
Originally Posted by WhisperJet
(Post 2665729)
Seems simple. If you are getting disability (or have any other issue), check yes and deal with the process. Then sleep easy knowing you're square.
HIPAA is just going to be a speed bump in the rush to Protect the Public. IMO if you are under 60, and especially if you are under 55, everything needs to line up. It is just a matter of time. |
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
(Post 2666289)
That question has been on the FAA medical application for decades.
GF 18(x) asks about illness, disability, or surgery. You could easily (beyond a reasonable doubt anyway) claim that you did not have a disability per se, even while collecting VA benefits if the condition was not significantly limiting. Per our previous discussion about the real nature of VA "disability". |
Originally Posted by 742Dash
(Post 2666310)
IMO if you are under 60, and especially if you are under 55, everything needs to line up. It is just a matter of time.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2666288)
Do you think a jury will be influenced by a medical form where the plaintiff states he has no such medical issue?
But it's a moot point, with the addition of 18(y) whether you have a "disability" or any medical condition is irrelevant, you have to disclose the fact that you're getting benefits. Very hard to weasel out of that fact if YOU applied for VA benefits AND the fed is depositing money in your checking account every month... |
Yes, unfortunately there are douche-bags in the military who game the system for $$. Most of the VA claims are legitimate. Some are not. In my outfit we just ran a guy off who was getting an 80% disability, but STILL managing to pass a Class II military flight physical and was flying as a line pilot.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2666288)
Do you think a jury will be influenced by a medical form where the plaintiff states he has no such medical issue?
If the signer has previously stated on paper that he or she has a disability (VA) and has accepted money for the disability, it's very hard to create any semblance of reasonable doubt that the signer wasn't fully aware when claiming no disability to the FAA. The paper trail is all there. Whether or not the signer tries to say he or she has no disability is irrelevant; it's all there on paper, signed, sealed, and now, delivered. Some don't get it, but sign that form, and you're making a legal statement. Sign your logbook or put information in your logbook, you've signed a legal document, fully admissible. Call the tower after landing, and you're recorded. It's evidence, and send back that 10-day response to the inspector's initial enquiry about a potential violation, and you've just submitted a legal statement that will be used against you. Say something in the cockpit, the CVR picks it up. You've just made a legal statement. Sign the log at the end of the flight; that's a legal document. It's evidence. All of it. As clear, and as sure as a fingerprint, a smoking gun, or blood on the pant leg. It's all legal evidence, and yes, a jury can be convinced with evidence. In fact, in the face of the evidence, a jury is left with little choice, and in the case of a grand jury, the case is presented without opposition. Take the VA benefits, if merited; that's what it's for. No harm, no crime, no foul. Just don't lie about it later or attempt to have the cake, and eat it too. That cake is evidence. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2666382)
No, less than ten years. A quick look at my records shows question 18(y) was not on the form in 2008. That asks about disability *benefits*.
18(x) asks about illness, disability, or surgery. You could easily (beyond a reasonable doubt anyway) claim that you did not have a disability per se, even while collecting VA benefits if the condition was not significantly limiting. Per our previous discussion about the real nature of VA "disability". Re: “benefits”, are we talking about money only, or do “benefits” include such things as VA loans, free tuition, etc? If someone has a “0%” rating and receiving no money are they on the radar? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:00 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands