FAA removes Check Pilot Medical Requirements
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: Retired NJA & AA
Basically what this says is if you're not a required crewmember then you don't need to hold a medical. This might open up some jobs to those who have lost their medicals.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...al-requirement
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...al-requirement
#2
Basically what this says is if you're not a required crewmember then you don't need to hold a medical. This might open up some jobs to those who have lost their medicals.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...al-requirement
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-n...al-requirement
A check airmen that can’t perform half the duties is hardly worth the trouble:
- initial linecheck
- newhire IOE
- requalify linecheck
- you can’t fail a linecheck on the outbound as you’ve got no one qualified to fly the plane back.
#3
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: Retired NJA & AA
They cleared up inconsistencies in the language.
A check airmen that can’t perform half the duties is hardly worth the trouble:
A check airmen that can’t perform half the duties is hardly worth the trouble:
- initial linecheck
- newhire IOE
- requalify linecheck
- you can’t fail a linecheck on the outbound as you’ve got no one qualified to fly the plane back.
#4
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,861
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
That's what this would be useful for, recurrent linechecks, airlines have to do a lot of them.
From the union perspective we'd prefer to have such no-medical LCA drawn from the ranks of those out on medical disability. Don't really want random line checks from third parties (already get that from the FAA).
#5
If it's a recurrent linecheck, that's not very likely to happen. I can think of just one that I was aware of and both crew got grounded anyway.
That's what this would be useful for, recurrent linechecks, airlines have to do a lot of them.
From the union perspective we'd prefer to have such no-medical LCA drawn from the ranks of those out on medical disability. Don't really want random line checks from third parties (already get that from the FAA).
That's what this would be useful for, recurrent linechecks, airlines have to do a lot of them.
From the union perspective we'd prefer to have such no-medical LCA drawn from the ranks of those out on medical disability. Don't really want random line checks from third parties (already get that from the FAA).
#6
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 15
From: 757
Basically what this says is if you're not a required crewmember then you don't need to hold a medical. This might open up some jobs to those who have lost their medicals.
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2024-06-27/faa-removes-check-pilot-medical-requirement
https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2024-06-27/faa-removes-check-pilot-medical-requirement
Wonder if will remove medical requirement to jumpseat
#7
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,861
Likes: 658
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I don't think that's actually an FAA requirement? At previous airlines both non-pilot execs and LTD pilots with no medical could jumpseat.
At my current airline, I know the CEO jumpseats and I doubt he has a medical.
Probably just a company thing?
At my current airline, I know the CEO jumpseats and I doubt he has a medical.
Probably just a company thing?
#8
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 15
From: 757
Prob...or maybe just when you cross companies...dunno
#9
Now I could be totally wrong on that.
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 565
Likes: 6
From: Poolside
How about all of the FAA maintenance, avionics, and cabin safety Inspectors who don't hold a medical?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



