Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA and Endeavor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2014 | 11:23 AM
  #41  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
For some reason it seems very apparent that the company wants to get to 81 airplanes as quickly as possible via natural attrition. Why? I don't know. I've asked and been told "it's in the business plan and the plan is good". Of course this is from folks who don't have a spot on the seniority list or are even pilots for that matter, but when I ask "why" the answer remains that 81 airplanes is where we will be and its a good thing. Asking "what happens when we get close to 81 and attrition still outpaces hiring?" Gets a "DL" controls hiring and they know all the attrition details. So who knows. Guys are bailing to CPZ and PSA, CA's are going to DL and other majors, some are leaving the industry, some are going to LCC's. In the end, it's all speculation. Nobody would have forecasted all the industry changes 2 years ago and been spot on for each carrier across the regional industry.

Not to stir the pot, but DL isn't stupid at this shell game. Unfortunately, nobody knows the current playbook to do anything but speculate and make decisions based on personal views and positions.
Delta runs a great mainline operation, but they can't manage a regional. It's been that way for almost two decades now, with almost every defunct regional over that time period having been DCI associated. They think what works for big D, works for DCI, but it doesn't work that way.
Reply
Old 10-04-2014 | 12:27 PM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Bent over
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
For some reason it seems very apparent that the company wants to get to 81 airplanes as quickly as possible via natural attrition. Why? I don't know. I've asked and been told "it's in the business plan and the plan is good". Of course this is from folks who don't have a spot on the seniority list or are even pilots for that matter, but when I ask "why" the answer remains that 81 airplanes is where we will be and its a good thing. Asking "what happens when we get close to 81 and attrition still outpaces hiring?" Gets a "DL" controls hiring and they know all the attrition details. So who knows. Guys are bailing to CPZ and PSA, CA's are going to DL and other majors, some are leaving the industry, some are going to LCC's. In the end, it's all speculation. Nobody would have forecasted all the industry changes 2 years ago and been spot on for each carrier across the regional industry.

Not to stir the pot, but DL isn't stupid at this shell game. Unfortunately, nobody knows the current playbook to do anything but speculate and make decisions based on personal views and positions.
Perhaps it's directly related to the 717's DAL subleased from SWA
Reply
Old 10-04-2014 | 12:38 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 919
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by deadreckoning
Perhaps it's directly related to the 717's DAL subleased from SWA
Well... the 900 deliveries are directly tied to DALs 717s, but the 200 wind down doesn't effect anything I would imagine.
Reply
Old 10-04-2014 | 01:44 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,496
Likes: 505
Default

Edit: info already corrected

Last edited by ShyGuy; 10-04-2014 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old 10-04-2014 | 06:46 PM
  #45  
Colnago's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
Well... the 900 deliveries are directly tied to DALs 717s, but the 200 wind down doesn't effect anything I would imagine.
Umm...effect?
Reply
Old 10-04-2014 | 07:48 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
For some reason it seems very apparent that the company wants to get to 81 airplanes as quickly as possible via natural attrition. Why? I don't know. I've asked and been told "it's in the business plan and the plan is good". Of course this is from folks who don't have a spot on the seniority list or are even pilots for that matter, but when I ask "why" the answer remains that 81 airplanes is where we will be and its a good thing. Asking "what happens when we get close to 81 and attrition still outpaces hiring?" Gets a "DL" controls hiring and they know all the attrition details. So who knows. Guys are bailing to CPZ and PSA, CA's are going to DL and other majors, some are leaving the industry, some are going to LCC's. In the end, it's all speculation. Nobody would have forecasted all the industry changes 2 years ago and been spot on for each carrier across the regional industry.

Not to stir the pot, but DL isn't stupid at this shell game. Unfortunately, nobody knows the current playbook to do anything but speculate and make decisions based on personal views and positions.

.....And speculation is all that this is, but this is the hunch I have:

DAL pilot contract is up for renewal in 2015. Negations have already begun as I understand it. One likely hot button issue is "scope" and "taking back scope". As it happens, Delta already owns and operates 81 76 seat two-class jets, complete with 3 sims, full mx, and dispatch infrastructure. I see a potential for DAL offering to bring these 81 airframes onto mainline in return for "xyz" where of course xyz saves them a ton of money. Our 81 airplanes would be another 500 or so captain seats that would likely go pretty junior, so the likelihood of them taking the offer would be pretty high. I don't think the airplanes would transfer all at once overnight, although I suppose they could. But DAL is to smart to flush all the staffing for 81 airplanes out onto the street and than try to hire equal staffing through their process. I think we would see some kind of integration, perhaps with some fencing and some form of cursory gate keeping at least for awhile.

So IF there where any validity to my theory, it would make sense that they would want us to be 900 ONLY by that time, as having 200's in the mix would only complicate things,

In addition, the "tiger team" has spent a lot of time and resources re-writing manuals that where just re-written a year ago. Now they are (apparently) virtually identical to DAL and even contain DAL branding. Having procedures that are based on DAL is neato, but doesn't make business sense to spend money on unless there is a chance that a DAL pilot may one day need to be trained on the a/c.

Just my two cents, not trying to start rumors, just makes total business sense and fits with DAL's MO of engineering win/win deals and thinking outside the box.


.
Reply
Old 10-05-2014 | 10:42 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
From: Just another RJ guy
Default

Originally Posted by BATOL
.....And speculation is all that this is, but this is the hunch I have:

DAL pilot contract is up for renewal in 2015. Negations have already begun as I understand it. One likely hot button issue is "scope" and "taking back scope". As it happens, Delta already owns and operates 81 76 seat two-class jets, complete with 3 sims, full mx, and dispatch infrastructure. I see a potential for DAL offering to bring these 81 airframes onto mainline in return for "xyz" where of course xyz saves them a ton of money. Our 81 airplanes would be another 500 or so captain seats that would likely go pretty junior, so the likelihood of them taking the offer would be pretty high. I don't think the airplanes would transfer all at once overnight, although I suppose they could. But DAL is to smart to flush all the staffing for 81 airplanes out onto the street and than try to hire equal staffing through their process. I think we would see some kind of integration, perhaps with some fencing and some form of cursory gate keeping at least for awhile.

So IF there where any validity to my theory, it would make sense that they would want us to be 900 ONLY by that time, as having 200's in the mix would only complicate things,

In addition, the "tiger team" has spent a lot of time and resources re-writing manuals that where just re-written a year ago. Now they are (apparently) virtually identical to DAL and even contain DAL branding. Having procedures that are based on DAL is neato, but doesn't make business sense to spend money on unless there is a chance that a DAL pilot may one day need to be trained on the a/c.

Just my two cents, not trying to start rumors, just makes total business sense and fits with DAL's MO of engineering win/win deals and thinking outside the box.


.


Reading your post felt like this ^^^^^
Reply
Old 10-06-2014 | 12:40 AM
  #48  
Flitestar's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Colnago
Umm...effect?
+1

10char
Reply
Old 10-06-2014 | 05:58 PM
  #49  
CRJ900LR's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: A320 - F/O
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound


Reading your post felt like this ^^^^^
That's actually therapy in China for eye infections
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
205
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
RyanP
PSA Airlines
75
09-30-2013 06:29 AM
What
Regional
27
09-18-2013 09:09 AM
N927EV
PSA Airlines
77
09-09-2013 08:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices