![]() |
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 1784917)
Well... If people would look at and compare contracts they would see the difference. Not going to sit here and post all the reasons. It's been covered pretty well... Besides PSA has done nothing but bring this industry down by voting in the contract they did.
Could you post a side by side comparison of each contract? Do you have any idea what is actually in PSA's, or TSA's contract and what makes them so "bad" or are you just following the internet herd in chastising us? PSA pilots have industry leading QoL due to schedule flexibility, as well as comparable pay to the "good" regionals. I fail to see how that "brings the industry down." |
Originally Posted by Hou757
(Post 1784917)
Well... If people would look at and compare contracts they would see the difference. Not going to sit here and post all the reasons. It's been covered pretty well... Besides PSA has done nothing but bring this industry down by voting in the contract they did.
Covered pretty well? I've read a lot of PSA bashing on here for the last year or so, but I have not once seen someone actually post ONE fact that shows PSA's contract below industry average. Even if the upgrades stop and I top out at 4 year FO pay, it will still be above average for a regional. I think it's easy to pick on PSA but I doubt you know the specifics of the contract. I may be new to the 121 world but I've been reading these boards pretty religiously for the last 3 years and that's why I chose to come to PSA regardless of "how bad" others think the contract is. The growth at PSA played a role in my decision to come here also, but the fact is that even if the music stops and upgrade goes to 5 years there is really only 2 other regionals I would give the time of day. Any airline you go to is a gamble, but it's wise to take the facts given and give yourself the best chance of moving up. Maybe PSA doesn't work out the way everybody thinks, but right now the facts are in my favor. |
It's not that your contract is below average, but maybe below what the Envoy guys would like their to be.. so they voted no twice and now they have an even lesser last deal on the table. The 12 year rates proposed for PDT, compress into less years the same max rates that existed for 18 years on the older contract. Better pay sooner, if actually stop to look at it.
Then there's the resentment that some may have accepted airplanes stolen from them.. somebody's gotta do it. They are having challenges staffing up, other aren't. |
Originally Posted by Frick
(Post 1784951)
I have not once seen someone actually post ONE fact that shows PSA's contract below industry average.
|
Originally Posted by Maingear
(Post 1784962)
That's not the issue. The issue is that PSA took concessions on an already good contract in order to secure new flying. It sets a new standard that in order to get more flying, pilots should be willing to take concessions. Where does it end? At what point has it gone too far? The reason why Eagle is in their corner is directly because of PSA. If PSA didn't set the precedence, then Eagle would not be having to take concessions to stay alive. You are directly responsible for Eagle, PDT, and who knows who else in the future having a diminished QoL and smaller paychecks.
|
If PSA would have voted no Envoy's situation would be the same. AMR now AAG was trying to sell or spinoff American Eagle 3 years ago. They've been trying to get rid of Eagle and this is their way of doing it. If PSA would have voted no Envoy's CRJs would STILL be leaving. Maybe not to PSA, but they would be going to someone else none the less. And the ERJs would still be going to trans states and express jet. PSA's vote did not change the future of Envoy. It might have changed where Envoy's planes are going, but it did not change the fate of Envoy.
|
Originally Posted by Frick
(Post 1784973)
If PSA would have voted no Envoy's situation would be the same. AMR now AAG was trying to sell or spinoff American Eagle 3 years ago. They've been trying to get rid of Eagle and this is their way of doing it. If PSA would have voted no Envoy's CRJs would STILL be leaving. Maybe not to PSA, but they would be going to someone else none the less. And the ERJs would still be going to trans states and express jet. PSA's vote did not change the future of Envoy. It might have changed where Envoy's planes are going, but it did not change the fate of Envoy.
|
Go to TSA. The PSA ladies voted in a contract that stabbed the regional industry in the back and are the main reason that guys at Envoy are losing their jobs, families, livelihoods and leaving the industry for good. They're spineless. Go to an airline that doesn't have a pilot group that is shameful. Consider Compass, Skywest or TSA.
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1784429)
I'd go a company that's getting mainline Ejet aircraft. That under the wing jet time is pretty much worth twice E-145/CRJ200 time.
Most mainline airlines want 80k+ lbs MTOW jet experience and the Ejets qualify. Don't waste you time with those little 145/CRJ corporate looking jets unless that's all you can handle. |
Urban legend..
Majors like to see some TPIC, but some are hiring straight F/Os. How's the experience flying a F-16 or A-10 any less valuable than CRJ/ERJ time in a structured CRM environment? It's not, both are getting hired. The bar is going to continue to slide anyway. |
Originally Posted by Karma
(Post 1785082)
+1
Most mainline airlines want 80k+ lbs MTOW jet experience and the Ejets qualify. Don't waste you time with those little 145/CRJ corporate looking jets unless that's all you can handle. |
Originally Posted by buddies8
(Post 1785066)
you actually have little to no idea of what you speak of. the bold has been for over twenty years every time there is a contract negotiation.
|
Originally Posted by Maingear
(Post 1784962)
That's not the issue. The issue is that PSA took concessions on an already good contract in order to secure new flying. It sets a new standard that in order to get more flying, pilots should be willing to take concessions. Where does it end? At what point has it gone too far? The reason why Eagle is in their corner is directly because of PSA. If PSA didn't set the precedence, then Eagle would not be having to take concessions to stay alive. You are directly responsible for Eagle, PDT, and who knows who else in the future having a diminished QoL and smaller paychecks.
|
Originally Posted by Karma
(Post 1785082)
+1
Most mainline airlines want 80k+ lbs MTOW jet experience and the Ejets qualify. Don't waste you time with those little 145/CRJ corporate looking jets unless that's all you can handle. He was joking. |
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 1785657)
They don't... A good majority of my class at a major had only E145 or CRJ2 time.
He was joking. |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1784840)
Do you tell everyone you fly for mainline? I know I get paid better than all your FOs
By the way I make more than your captains do....ya prick |
Oh yea my QOL and Travel benfits are way better too!
|
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786139)
Oh yea my QOL and Travel benfits are way better too!
|
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786136)
You get paid better or you work harder? You don't seem very bright, our pay rated is higher. Anyone can pick up open time and make money. Good luck getting 16-17 days off a month consistently..
By the way I make more than your captains do....ya prick |
Originally Posted by Frick
(Post 1784951)
Even if the upgrades stop and I top out at 4 year FO pay, it will still be above average for a regional.
|
Originally Posted by wmupilot85
(Post 1786159)
I make $41.59 as a year 4 FO...what do you make?
|
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786136)
You get paid better or you work harder? You don't seem very bright, our pay rated is higher. Anyone can pick up open time and make money. Good luck getting 16-17 days off a month consistently..
By the way I make more than your captains do....ya prick |
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786136)
You get paid better or you work harder? You don't seem very bright, our pay rated is higher. Anyone can pick up open time and make money. Good luck getting 16-17 days off a month consistently..
By the way I make more than your captains do....ya prick |
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786136)
You get paid better or you work harder? You don't seem very bright, our pay rated is higher. Anyone can pick up open time and make money. Good luck getting 16-17 days off a month consistently..
By the way I make more than your captains do....ya prick |
Originally Posted by weekendflyer
(Post 1786236)
Haha what is it a high school diploma?
|
Originally Posted by PCLCREW
(Post 1785657)
They don't... A good majority of my class at a major had only E145 or CRJ2 time.
He was joking. |
Man, regional pilots blaming each other for their issues... Exactly what the CEO's want.. PSA hates Mesa because we were going to take their airplanes, Envoy hates PSA... Wait, lets be real here, Envoy hates everyone else who is not Envoy... I care about Envoy as much as they care about me, which is zilch. A street hire captain at PSA is sounding pretty good...
|
I'm dumber from reading this page. And THAT is saying something.
|
Originally Posted by FaceBiter
(Post 1786372)
I'm dumber from reading this page. And THAT is saying something.
|
I'm even dumberrer now after reading the post above.
|
This thread is almost two months old but still a very relevant question for new hires looking for opinions from current 121 pilots. Me...Military pilot commuting from MI just looking for honest opinions. Thanks
|
Originally Posted by Slapum Wtarsec
(Post 1825203)
This thread is almost two months old but still a very relevant question for new hires looking for opinions from current 121 pilots. Me...Military pilot commuting from MI just looking for honest opinions. Thanks
|
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1825208)
Choose the place with the easiest commute from Michigan. Pay and upgrade are similar. One flies E-145 50 seater and the other flies CRJ-200,700,900 50 and 76 seaters. Your goal should be the place that gets you into class fastest and the best commute. Unless you have skeletons in your closet, you'll be picked up by a major before you upgrade to Captain.
|
Originally Posted by Slapum Wtarsec
(Post 1825265)
Thanks! No skeletons just low time because my base lost our jets. Leaning more towards TSA, class date in less than a month
|
Originally Posted by Slapum Wtarsec
(Post 1825265)
Thanks! No skeletons just low time because my base lost our jets. Leaning more towards TSA, class date in less than a month
I would agree with the others: pick the path of least commute. What about Compass or even Endeavor? a DTW base would be good for you. Like others have said, if you are ex military with no skeletons, you'll be at a major in no time so upgrade times and other things pertinent to the average regional new hire are of less concern to you right now. Thanks for your service (Ex-AF Driver) |
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1825275)
What base?
I would agree with the others: pick the path of least commute. What about Compass or even Endeavor? a DTW base would be good for you. Like others have said, if you are ex military with no skeletons, you'll be at a major in no time so upgrade times and other things pertinent to the average regional new hire are of less concern to you right now. Thanks for your service (Ex-AF Driver) I'm MI ANG, thanks for your service and insight |
Originally Posted by etflies
(Post 1825270)
If you have any questions about TSA training, PM me and I'll answer what I can. For what it's worth, I left one of the so called "good" regionals to come here and so far I don't regret it.
|
I left republic for TSA...start IOE sunday...throw any q's at me
|
Originally Posted by PilotCrusader
(Post 1825275)
What base?
I would agree with the others: pick the path of least commute. What about Compass or even Endeavor? a DTW base would be good for you. Like others have said, if you are ex military with no skeletons, you'll be at a major in no time so upgrade times and other things pertinent to the average regional new hire are of less concern to you right now. Thanks for your service (Ex-AF Driver) Thank you for your service as well |
If it were me I would chose PSA. If you already have the mins to upgrade then you will do so in about 6-7 months. You will spend about 2 months in training. 1.5-2 months waiting on IOE at home while getting paid. Then come off IOE with a line and upgrade in 3-4 months. If you do the TSA thing then great you get to log a little PIC time when they let you fly in the left seat but again you are scheduling's puppet on both the CA side and the FO side for a long time. You will be getting paid less over the course of your first year at TSA and not have the QOL that the contract has at PSA. Just my 2 cents.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands