![]() |
Originally Posted by jumpseat2024
(Post 1925066)
But you'll be happy to know it doesn't look like the new SSP agreement will be useful for anyone with a seniority number over 500.
|
Originally Posted by daOldMan
(Post 1925087)
Wouldn't a larger SSP number mean that more senior captains are moving on to mainline, creating additional openings for junior captains to move up? If it really is 8 a month, that would mean an additional 100 captain spots opening each year, as well as LCA positions if people want to do that.
The SSP/flow helps everyone on the list, even if it does take years to get to mainline. Without it, the list can become stagnant and everyone on the bottom half of the list suffers. The flow should be helping Envoy as well, and may be, but the problem there is that airplanes are leaving just as quickly as pilots are. The company is overstaffed and thus there is little to no movement. Once they are at the correct number of pilots for the airplanes that are on property, the movement upwards should be decent if not good. But, as I said in a different post, it is all based on new pilots coming in at the bottom of the list. Right now, the regionals are a bad Amway style pyramid scheme. Senior guys at all companies are trying to get new FO's to come to their airline and not to go to others. There are PSA guys doing it and there are Envoy guys doing it. Anyone that has been in the business awhile knows that everything will stop if there are not new hires coming in the door. AAG will stop the flow in a heartbeat if they can not staff the airplanes at the regionals. Sure, you can take it to arbitration and get it reinstated, but arbitration can take 2-3 years. Look at how long PSA has been in arbitration for the SAP. AAG knows that regional pilots have no power over them and they can do what they want. |
The other thing that many people forget in this discussion is that while the number of people leaving on the entire seniority list for other jobs may remain fairly constant each month, you will not move up by that number each month. For instance, if the average attrition at a company is 20 a month, by the time that you have been at a company a year or so, you may only be moving up 10 spots a month and the other 10 will have been behind you on the list.
In this current environment, experienced pilots are leaving one airline to go to another. It is not uncommon now to have guys with 8000-1000 hours at a 121 carrier show up in a new hire class at a different regional. Although this is not new (Colgan, Comair, Atlantic Coast, etc...), the hiring boon at the majors and LCC's at the same time is fairly odd. There are new FO's getting hired at LCC's before they even finish IOE at the regional. The attrition is happening just as fast, if not faster, from the bottom of the list as compared to the top. Many people that are at a company that has a flow are reluctant to leave their regional job (with decent captain pay and good bidding seniority) to go start a new job at a LCC at the bottom of the list again. I would bet that with very few exceptions there are few captains that are in the top 300 numbers at PSA that would leave to go to JetBlue or SouthWest. The same is probably true at Envoy (although a greater number since the flow is greater). They will hold out for American. That is speculation, but I can't imagine them leaving for a glorified regional (LCC) when they could be at a legacy in a few years and have a good quality of life for those few years. The point of all of this being, once you hit 50% on the seniority list, the attrition outside of the flow is greatly reduced. Senior captains have more to lose, and are more reluctant to make a move unless it is really worth it. You can't say that attrition above you will remain constant for your career. When I was a new hire, I was moving up 25 spots a month. A couple years later, I was moving up 6 spots a month. The overall attrition was the same, but people behind me were leaving, not in front of me. |
Originally Posted by gold
(Post 1925093)
The flow at Envoy is 16 years right now. Bottom line, 1.5 year upgrades or less at PSA for anyone hired in the next six month. 11 year guys flowing to AA right now, dropping to five years at the end of 2018.
Some guys waited up to 3 or so years, then 9-11 tanked hiring and touched off the lost decade. Then when the flow restarted they waited about another 3 yeas. In other words, with the hiring working and flow working it took about 6 years worth of flow to actually flow. You spin it like a guy waited through 16 years of non-stop flow/hiring to flow. Simply not accurate at all. Neither is saying you have an 11 year flow. There was NO anything until 2013. So your 11 year guy waited 2 years to interview, not 11. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1925129)
That is simply not accurate. Nobody waited 16 years with hiring taking place at the mainline to flow.
Some guys waited up to 3 or so years, then 9-11 tanked hiring and touched off the lost decade. Then when the flow restarted they waited about another 3 yeas. In other words, with the hiring working and flow working it took about 6 years worth of flow to actually flow. You spin it like a guy waited through 16 years of non-stop flow/hiring to flow. Simply not accurate at all. Neither is saying you have an 11 year flow. There was NO anything until 2013. So your 11 year guy waited 2 years to interview, not 11. There is no simple math that will tell you a flow date or an upgrade date. If anyone posts these as hard numbers, look at their motive. There are simply too many variables to give a hard number. This statement above is one of the dumbest things that I have seen on here in awhile. Cujo is trying to say that 16 years isn't really 16 years, because hiring didn't take place for 10 of them. Another event could happen tomorrow and stop hiring for another 5 years. That doesn't mean that you will not be working those 5 years waiting to flow. The truth is that there are pilots at Envoy that have been there 16 years and are just starting to flow. Don't let his attempt at "new math/common core math" persuade you. The wait to flow is from DOH to starting class at AA/LUS. Period! How long you had to spend at the regional is the only metric. |
Originally Posted by Cujo665
(Post 1925129)
That is simply not accurate. Nobody waited 16 years with hiring taking place at the mainline to flow.
Some guys waited up to 3 or so years, then 9-11 tanked hiring and touched off the lost decade. Then when the flow restarted they waited about another 3 yeas. In other words, with the hiring working and flow working it took about 6 years worth of flow to actually flow. You spin it like a guy waited through 16 years of non-stop flow/hiring to flow. Simply not accurate at all. Neither is saying you have an 11 year flow. There was NO anything until 2013. So your 11 year guy waited 2 years to interview, not 11. |
I was jumpseating on PSA a couple of weeks ago, the aircrew has always been great, and the Capt said the training department was purposely failing direct entry captains so that they would be less hirable. The thought was that these captains would have to stay with the company longer thereby slowing the overall attrition. I find it hard to believe there is any truth in his statement but was wondering if there was anyone on property that could post the pass rates for checkrides?
|
Originally Posted by Ugly
(Post 1925174)
I was jumpseating on PSA a couple of weeks ago, the aircrew has always been great, and the Capt said the training department was purposely failing direct entry captains so that they would be less hirable. The thought was that these captains would have to stay with the company longer thereby slowing the overall attrition. I find it hard to believe there is any truth in his statement but was wondering if there was anyone on property that could post the pass rates for checkrides?
|
Originally Posted by Ugly
(Post 1925174)
I was jumpseating on PSA a couple of weeks ago, the aircrew has always been great, and the Capt said the training department was purposely failing direct entry captains so that they would be less hirable. The thought was that these captains would have to stay with the company longer thereby slowing the overall attrition. I find it hard to believe there is any truth in his statement but was wondering if there was anyone on property that could post the pass rates for checkrides?
FO pass rate is at 89% and capt upgrade is at 98% pass rate, 1st class of dec's is still doing indoc. |
Originally Posted by Ugly
(Post 1925174)
I was jumpseating on PSA a couple of weeks ago, the aircrew has always been great, and the Capt said the training department was purposely failing direct entry captains so that they would be less hirable. The thought was that these captains would have to stay with the company longer thereby slowing the overall attrition. I find it hard to believe there is any truth in his statement but was wondering if there was anyone on property that could post the pass rates for checkrides?
If you search the threads, you will see tha pass rate is pretty high across the board. I have seen at other airlines in the past a much lower pass rate for street captains for a couple reasons. One is that the check ride SHOULD be tougher as you are becoming the captain at an airline. Also, many people that have spent years at another airline have a difficult time adapting to the way that the new company does things. The fastest way to fail a checkride is to say "but that is how we did it at my last company". |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands