Positive space to work?
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,659
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
I completely agree that if commuters were given free positive space in base employees need some compensation.
Last edited by vessbot; 08-05-2018 at 07:09 AM.
#45
Do you deadhead on company metal, Yes
What difference does it make if they are getting a free ride to work like a DH, but with contractual stipulation that it isn't on duty/paid.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
I'm generally extremely conservative regarding tax, however I would say the audit risk related to occasional positive space (such as 9E's second commute in option) is basically nil.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
I'm generally extremely conservative regarding tax, however I would say the audit risk related to occasional positive space (such as 9E's second commute in option) is basically nil.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
#48
I'm generally extremely conservative regarding tax, however I would say the audit risk related to occasional positive space (such as 9E's second commute in option) is basically nil.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
At worst it would be imputed income at something like 10% of a Y class fare. Essentially the IRS would have to be targeting airline pilots LOOKING for this particular issue and they aren't likely to do that because of the effort involved and low taxes due/ penalties likely.
But if you get caught, you can probably claim ignorance, pay the tax, interest, and penalties, and likely not go to jail.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,067
Being that we get positive space to training even in domicile and sometimes to work without any imputed tax withholdings, I highly doubt a corporation as large as mine, one that withholds taxes for vacation positive space passes would just not remember to do the same for work. You're out of your league, Donny. Jail time. Lol. Give me a break.
#50
You have no idea what you are talking about. Positive space records dont show up anywhere on anything you can access. And even if you COULD access when you traveled positive space, there is no fare value assigned to it. As would be required in order to claim it on taxes. As far as I know, that fare is $0.
Being that we get positive space to training even in domicile and sometimes to work without any imputed tax withholdings, I highly doubt a corporation as large as mine, one that withholds taxes for vacation positive space passes would just not remember to do the same for work. You're out of your league, Donny. Jail time. Lol. Give me a break.
Being that we get positive space to training even in domicile and sometimes to work without any imputed tax withholdings, I highly doubt a corporation as large as mine, one that withholds taxes for vacation positive space passes would just not remember to do the same for work. You're out of your league, Donny. Jail time. Lol. Give me a break.
Company paid travel ON COMPANY BUSINESS, from anywhere to anywhere, is not taxable (duh).
Company paid travel from your HOME to your USUAL place of work generally is taxable. That is not a business expense, you cannot deduct your drive to work (or your crashpad). This is well established in all industries.
For example, this includes company cars provided to some employees. The salesman who leaves home and goes on sales calls does NOT pay tax on his car. The VP who drives a company ride to/from the office DOES get taxed on that ride as compensation.
Airline nonrev is a grey area, which IRS has tried to tax in the past (and I'm sure will again). As of right now, space available for personal use is not taxed. Personal use is recreational travel AND going to/from work. Positive space IS taxed, that crosses some threshold with the IRS. Again, per the IRS travel to/from work is NOT a deductible expense. If the company provides it, it IS taxable (exceptions for certain things like the job site changes every week, ie home basing).
Again positive space is just like having a company car... depends on where you're driving. If it's to/from the usual workplace, it can be taxed.
The IRS in the past has obtained nonrev records from airlines, to facilitate witch hunts. I don't understand any of the legalities associated with that, or the mechanism by which it happens. Perhaps there is some magical electronic box in a basement somewhere which stores information in a compact electronic manner, which can somehow be re-constitued at a later time? I don't know.
And I did say you wouldn't go to jail. I said "probably" because I don't want anyone blaming me if I'm wrong and they do go to jail.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post