Piedmont vs. PSA
03-04-2019 | 01:29 PM
#101
Banned
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Plus, then he'd be able to express his opinions. Not in the union=keep your complaints to yourself, pal!
03-05-2019 | 03:08 AM
#106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
At least at Piedmont you guys actually get to vote. Over at PSA our Union keeps signing **** behind closed doors without any input from the pilot group.
Then after it's signed they tell us about it and ask for our thoughts as if it's not already signed and sealed.
All we can do is slowly try to replace Union reps one at a time.
Then after it's signed they tell us about it and ask for our thoughts as if it's not already signed and sealed.
All we can do is slowly try to replace Union reps one at a time.
03-05-2019 | 05:50 AM
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
03-05-2019 | 08:34 AM
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
None of the Union reps SAP to 65 to pick up SDO so why not give it away? They're big fans of trading the pilot groups quality of life to improve their own.
03-05-2019 | 08:40 AM
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
PDT shut down Captain upgrades due to FO staffing while new hire classes are single digit in size.
Forced or not, at least PSA is getting enough folks to allow upgrades and career progression...
More points for PSA.
Forced or not, at least PSA is getting enough folks to allow upgrades and career progression...
More points for PSA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
