Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional lifers. Why are they stuck? >

Regional lifers. Why are they stuck?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional lifers. Why are they stuck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:06 AM
  #191  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by nuball5
Where are you getting $78/hr at Jetblue from?
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, it’s now up to $86.

https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...etblue_airways

That’s still a pay cut for a senior regional captain most places today. Especially when you consider the cost of the crash pad and the loss of scheduling priority that allowed them to pick up premium pay. Even more so if they were an LCA or SLIP living in base. The point is that it’s a CUT.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:14 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 298
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, it’s now up to $86.

https://www.airlinepilotcentral.com/...etblue_airways

That’s still a pay cut for a senior regional captain most places today. Especially when you consider the cost of the crash pad and the loss of scheduling priority that allowed them to pick up premium pay. Even more so if they were an LCA or SLIP living in base. The point is that it’s a CUT.
How about with retirement? Profit sharing? It's pretty easy to skew the numbers the other way.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:19 AM
  #193  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Taco280AI
No. Because some lines of work simply don't interest a certain sex. It has been proven that women avoid certain careers, not because they can't do them well, but simply because they don't want the lifestyle. Men, on average, work more hours, take less sick days, take less time off, use less vacation time than women from studies I've seen. Much of it has to do with family, especially if there are kids involved. In this case maybe being a pilot isn't as desired for women because it will take them away from family more.

Other jobs, they just don't want to do. How many straight men do nails? How many women collect garbage? Both potentially pay well, just no desire to do it.
Wonder if all of this is the reason women live longer than men.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:20 AM
  #194  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Default

Many reasons people don’t leave. It’s always funny though when people make up stories to justify their reasons why they haven’t left. This from a Skywest lifer thread is typical


I'm running into guys who left 20 year ago.

One guy, a UAL F/O wishes he'd never left.

One guy got furloughed by the same major - twice. He was literally an OO new-hire three times.

Another guy is a wide-body F/O. He could easily be a narrow-body captain but still wouldn't hold weekends off.

Everyone I know who went to SWA is happy there and making good money. I often ask them what there are doing next weekend - invariably, it's working.

Most of the guys I know that were unhappy here are unhappy elsewhere too”

Newsflash. I’ve NEVER met anyone from UA, DL, SWA or the bigger cargo carriers who think they make a mistake leaving. Crock of shjt. They guy that posted that is essentially unhirable anyway as he’s a miserable SOAB.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 11:32 AM
  #195  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 7
Default

The vast majority of the weirdest and worst pilots I flew with at XJT were lifers. Always with an excuse of why they stayed on and the excuse was always odd.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 12:26 PM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 298
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by domino
Many reasons people don’t leave. It’s always funny though when people make up stories to justify their reasons why they haven’t left. This from a Skywest lifer thread is typical


I'm running into guys who left 20 year ago.

One guy, a UAL F/O wishes he'd never left.

One guy got furloughed by the same major - twice. He was literally an OO new-hire three times.

Another guy is a wide-body F/O. He could easily be a narrow-body captain but still wouldn't hold weekends off.

Everyone I know who went to SWA is happy there and making good money. I often ask them what there are doing next weekend - invariably, it's working.

Most of the guys I know that were unhappy here are unhappy elsewhere too”

Newsflash. I’ve NEVER met anyone from UA, DL, SWA or the bigger cargo carriers who think they make a mistake leaving. Crock of shjt. They guy that posted that is essentially unhirable anyway as he’s a miserable SOAB.
Lol. Yup, and how long would a new hire have to stick around here to hold a captain seat with weekends off in a west coast base? MF is quite a character.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 12:45 PM
  #197  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,138
Likes: 798
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
This begs the question: Should every profession represent a cross-section of society?

Professional sports teams?
Hairdressers?
Pedicurists?
Wait staff?
Nurses?
Teachers?

If not, why?
No.

Every profession should reasonably represent a fair cross section of qualified applicants. If there's real discrimination it would show up there.

Also reasonable (IMO only) to help improve education and outreach for the youth of under-represented demographics. I'm willing to pay for that too. Teach a man to fish and all that.

But once you're an adult you need to compete on your merits, otherwise you institutionalize hypocrisy, perpetuate racial/cultural divides, and perpetuate a culture of people who do not stand on their own two feet. Look to the federal civil service if you have any questions about that last.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 12:46 PM
  #198  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Joachim
In its intention, diversity based preferential hiring is a good thing.
Absolutely not!

People should be hired on their merits, nothing more (except maybe their personalities too of course).

Hiring someone for their skin color, nationality, race, sexual preference, sex, etc is pure discrimination -- the same as it would be for NOT hiring someone based on the same criteria.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 01:10 PM
  #199  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by word302
How about with retirement? Profit sharing? It's pretty easy to skew the numbers the other way.
Oh, EVENTUALLY it’s a MUCH better deal, if the person has enough flying years left, but that doesn’t stop it from being a short term hit in the pocketbook. And yeah, I could certainly take the hit and maybe you could too, but I don’t have kids in college or any serious medical problems in my family that my insurance doesn’t cover or kids that have run afoul of drugs or the law. And frankly, some people just live paycheck to paycheck and it doesn’t matter if they are a regional FO or a legacy widebidy captain. I’m not advocating that lifestyle, but a lot of people do it.

All I’m saying is that it would be easier to take the step from senior regional captain to juniorist of the junior major FO if the economic hit weren’t there.
Reply
Old 03-30-2019 | 01:12 PM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,284
Likes: 103
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
In its intention, diversity based preferential hiring is a good thing.
NOPE, diversity is good, but NOT FOR DIVERSITY'S SAKE.

Originally Posted by Taco280AI
No. Because some lines of work simply don't interest a certain sex.
Wow, you mean like how being a pilot doesn't really interest a certain sex as much as the other?

Originally Posted by Taco280AI
has been proven that women avoid certain careers, not because they can't do them well, but simply because they don't want the lifestyle.
Also been proven that when the reality of an airline career hits them, they bail out.

Originally Posted by Taco280AI
on average, work more hours, take less sick days, take less time off, use less vacation time than women from studies I've seen. Much of it has to do with family, especially if there are kids involved. In this case maybe being a pilot isn't as desired for women because it will take them away from family more.
Ya think?

Originally Posted by Taco280AI
jobs, they just don't want to do. How many straight men do nails? How many women collect garbage? Both potentially pay well, just no desire to do it.
Yet straight males go into nursing, yet under represented. Teachers, same.....

And why are singling out "straight"?

Originally Posted by rickair7777
No

every profession should reasonably represent a fair cross section of qualified applicants. If there's real discrimination it would show up there.
Exactly, the point I've made, Goggles has in the past, and others is, what's the ratio of those specific applicants vs. interviewed/hired? Pretty sure it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure that out.

Originally Posted by rickair7777
reasonable (IMO only) to help improve education and outreach for the youth of under-represented demographics. I'm willing to pay for that too. Teach a man to fish and all that.
EXACTLY. This is where the help, chance, opportunity needs to be extended/given.

Originally Posted by rickair7777
once you're an adult you need to compete on your merits, otherwise you institutionalize hypocrisy, perpetuate racial/cultural divides, and perpetuate a culture of people who do not stand on their own two feet. Look to the federal civil service if you have any questions about that last.
Again, true.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chuck D
Regional
51
09-23-2014 07:08 AM
PilotAnalyst
Regional
18
10-22-2012 01:39 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices