Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Where does Delta currently have the 900's going out of SLC and ATL? >

Where does Delta currently have the 900's going out of SLC and ATL?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Where does Delta currently have the 900's going out of SLC and ATL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2007 | 03:06 PM
  #11  
ghilis101's Avatar
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

ok so if you got this:

BOW: 47,000 lbs(not sure how close i am on this one)
Max 76 PAX at 190 lbs winter: 14,440
Max Fwd and Aft Cargo Worst case: 5,440

ZFW: 66,880 if my BOW was correct (Max ZFW allowable is 70,750)

Max T/O is 84,500, so this means you can take 17,620 lbs fuel - (Max allowed on board is 19,594)


call it a 5 hour flight at 3500 lbs/hr = 17,500 lb burn (this is an overly conservative burn that incorporates landing with reserves)

hmmm it looks close but then again there probably wont be that much cargo on board
Reply
Old 05-03-2007 | 03:24 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 9
Default

XJet flies YYZ-IAH nearly four hours there in the 145-XLR. Now THAT is craziness...
Reply
Old 05-03-2007 | 06:31 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RedBaron007
..... I wouldn't want to fly on one as a passenger for 4 hours.

I have. And no, you wouldn't.
Reply
Old 05-03-2007 | 07:01 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

The problem on the longer legs (PIT-SLC, YYZ-SLC) is not how much payload you can carry, but how much fuel. The 900 has the exact same fuel tank capacity as the 700 and often times cannot do YYZ-SLC with headwinds and an alternate. Dropping payload doesn't do anything to get more fuel on because the tanks are already full. We've had to stop in MSP, MCI, and ICT a few times to get fuel.
Reply
Old 05-03-2007 | 09:36 PM
  #15  
Ellen's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Go Ugly Early
The problem on the longer legs (PIT-SLC, YYZ-SLC) is not how much payload you can carry, but how much fuel. The 900 has the exact same fuel tank capacity as the 700 and often times cannot do YYZ-SLC with headwinds and an alternate. Dropping payload doesn't do anything to get more fuel on because the tanks are already full. We've had to stop in MSP, MCI, and ICT a few times to get fuel.
Interesting. Not so economical then to leave the FL's to hit pavement and gas up only to burn it again going back up. Time for longer range airplane. Sounds like it was a nice try.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices