Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Never too Old to Start ??? >

Never too Old to Start ???

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Never too Old to Start ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2007 | 05:43 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default Never too Old to Start ???

Call me crazy but I'm 57, retired, and looking to fly commercially. I have a decent pension so I can take the weak pay for a couple of years so I'm planning on upgrading my ratings & give it a shot. I currently have a PPL, SEL, IFR with 420TT. I have my class 1 medical and a TSA security check. I don't have a degree but I'm hoping a 30 year career at a major pharmaceutical co. will help offset that. Going the CFI route for a year is my choice of last resort. Hopefully a regional will give me a look once I have my hours & ratings upgraded (based on the age 60 to 65 change). If not then I may consider Gulfstream although most here seem to hate them for the PFT. It may be my best chance to actually fly and after a year or 2, I could move to 135 and fly until I can't. Still in the planning stage so all thoughts and suggestions are welcome...... and you can call me gramps if it makes you fell better !!
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 05:47 AM
  #2  
ghilis101's Avatar
La Familia Delta
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
From: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Default

go for it! if youre doing it just for the fun of it youll love it. just remember dont bring your fellow pilots down in the process who DO need the money (being an open time "*****"). good luck to you and enjoy!
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 05:58 AM
  #3  
ryane946's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 2
From: FO, looking left
Default

Personally, I think you have a much better shot doing either corporate or part 135. Age 60 will not change within 3 years. Last I heard was 2011 timeframe. The FAA has their hands full right now, and it is a government agency. I don't think there is much of a shot of getting hired at a regional. Your best bet would be to get a job flying something like a King Air. Maybe night frieght.
Good luck.
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 06:16 AM
  #4  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default

I had a late 50s guy in class with me at Eagle in Nov. So you can get hired. Don't go to gulfstream, its a rotten place from the best accounts.

Unlike ryane, I think the FAA will get the age 65 thing done before Bush is out of office. If not, it could be stalled for quite a while longer as the new adminstrator "studies" it.

Having said all that, think about the lifestyle you're getting into. Nobody on these boards complains about flying, just about how we're treated by the airlines we work for.

Four day trips with minimum rest overnights, 2-3 hour sits at airports with no crew rooms, eating airport food, sitting reserve, schlepping a 35# flight kit everywhere. There's a lot of downside to the job.

The upside is the people you fly with, and some really nice views.
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 06:19 AM
  #5  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

Either way he is onto a good thing because he has nothing to lose and plenty to gain.

What hits people like me who really want to fly but cannot take the low pay is that we can make so much elsewhere. We cannot take an 85% paycut to go join a regional. 23 year olds and retirees do not have this dilemma which makes them prime candidates for low paying, fun, enriching, and for the younger ones hopefully lucrative flying when their number comes up.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 05-09-2007 at 07:51 AM.
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 06:37 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the comments .... I think the age will change by 2009 but it still may be too late for me as it will be a risk for any regional to invest in me. I've thought about 135 but I'm too far from the 1200TT (I'm at 420). The problem I'm struggling with is which way to go with my additional ratings. If the regionals were a decent possibility, then comm ME and more time and ATP training would be the way to go but thats alot to invest when nothing is guaranteed. It seems the smart route would be to get my CFII just in case so I could build time toward the 135. I certainly don't like the thought that I'd be screwing someone out of a paying job.
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 06:58 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: DFW A320 FO
Default

Agree that you will probably be better off trying part 135 (SIC doesn't require 1200TT) or preferrably part 91 flying. You may be a bit late to the regional game unless the age 65 takes effect within a year or so (which is a possibility but not a probability). I'd imagine you'd enjoy a part 91 job most but a decent 135 job could be fun as well. I don't think you'd enjoy being a junior reserve pilot at a regional, it's a lot of hassle and downside for the upside of flying (that you seem to be able to afford privately) and 70-100 hours of flying each month is too much if you're just out to enjoy yourself.

I'd not worry about an ATP, that's a-ways off anyway. Go to a quickie Comm-MEL school where you can get max multi and your ticket asap, then add the CFIIME if you can't network into something right off the bat. Use your social skills and network starting today. There are decent jobs out there for resourceful, connected low-timers with enthusiasm.


Good luck!
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 07:46 AM
  #8  
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: FO - 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Tuckster
Call me crazy but I'm 57, retired, and looking to fly commercially. I have a decent pension so I can take the weak pay for a couple of years so I'm planning on upgrading my ratings & give it a shot. I currently have a PPL, SEL, IFR with 420TT. I have my class 1 medical and a TSA security check. I don't have a degree but I'm hoping a 30 year career at a major pharmaceutical co. will help offset that. Going the CFI route for a year is my choice of last resort. Hopefully a regional will give me a look once I have my hours & ratings upgraded (based on the age 60 to 65 change). If not then I may consider Gulfstream although most here seem to hate them for the PFT. It may be my best chance to actually fly and after a year or 2, I could move to 135 and fly until I can't. Still in the planning stage so all thoughts and suggestions are welcome...... and you can call me gramps if it makes you fell better !!
at eagle i had an fo who was hired at 56. and that was before the 65 rule, which will be in effect(maybe) before you turn 60. go for it.
Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 07:52 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

You gotto change that avatar !!!!! I can't concentrate on your comments !!!! I think you said go for it ???

Reply
Old 05-09-2007 | 09:02 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Default

Tuckster is right, HMP, you're driving me nuts too ;-) Go for it LoL...

And for YOU, Tuckster, GO FOR IT. Get some recency of experience in a twin and get in there. As much as this job sucks as a newbie Regional-FO, if you love Flying you have NOTHING to lose. I complain a bit too much myself, but I Love every damn second at work. LOVE it.

Go for it man. We're with ya.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CitationJason
Part 135
52
06-22-2017 11:29 AM
Jason4275
Flight Schools and Training
23
03-17-2016 07:16 PM
HerkFCC
Regional
24
02-24-2007 08:07 AM
Rascal
Foreign
4
02-01-2007 08:45 AM
ATPFlyer
Major
15
10-17-2006 05:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices