![]() |
Originally Posted by jetlag q
(Post 2945913)
How many cpp folks are filling classes per month? I think that should give a good baseline without confirmation from United.
|
Originally Posted by WiscoAviator
(Post 2945361)
Enough to simultaneously make the program seem legitimate while also maintaining staffing at the UAX regionals. My airline I believe trains about 10 new CAs per month and we are understaffed. I wouldn't expect more than 2 or 3 per month but that's just totally a guess.
Also, IMO the only thing they have to do to keep the program legitimate is to make the time of service for those being taken similar to the AA flows. So I would expect them to meter it so that the people being taken are around 5-6 years at the company.... again im just guessing If they don’t get their timeline significantly shorter than an AA flow no one will think they’re legitimate |
They’ll get it down to 2 years. With them selecting what we think is so few people so far the small pool will go to UA over the next year meanwhile the new hires selected will wait to get their time and be at the top of the list by the time they Qualify.
|
Aviate FIFO list
Anyone know the actual numbers per carrier, accepted into Aviate so far? First wave?
|
Originally Posted by Richaash
(Post 2984971)
Anyone know the actual numbers per carrier, accepted into Aviate so far? First wave?
Based on data collected by a buddy of mine that was compared to our union's data (the accuracy of which depends on Aviate participants actually emailing results to the union), XJT has approximately 65-70 successful Aviate participants TOTAL in 1st and 2nd waves. Assuming each carrier has a similar pass rate, their should be around 130-140 more successful participants from the other 3 participating carriers based on comparison of their # of pilots to XJT. That equates to 195-210 participants from 1st 2 waves. From what I have heard, it seems the 1st 2 deciles of the FIFO list are CPP participants who have yet to transition. That leaves the 195-210 Aviate participants occupying deciles 3-10. That means approximately 24-26 people per decile. If(and it's a HUGE if) these #s are accurate, then the following would be a general idea of what # you are in FIFO list: Dec 1: 1-25 CPP Dec 2: 26-50 CPP Dec 3: 51-75 Dec 4: 76-100 Dec 5: 101-125 Dec 6: 126-150 Dec 7: 151-175 Dec 8: 176-200 Dec 9: 201-225 Dec 10: 226-250 Look, I know these #s are wrong but by how much is the question. The margin of error is large and if we share some data we can narrow it down. I don't represent the XJT union in any capacity and definitely do not stand by the accuracy of these #s. Maybe we can all get some dialogue going to share what we do know(which isn't much). |
Remember Awac and CommuteAir have much smaller pilot groups to pull from. And Mesa effectively only has half the pilot group eligible. So I assume the other groups have half the Aviate pilots Expressjet has if the pass rate is near the same across airlines.
|
Originally Posted by predhead
(Post 2985104)
This is a really hard question to answer with the absence of any hard data from UAL and participating carriers/unions. I wont let that stop me from trying though!
Based on data collected by a buddy of mine that was compared to our union's data (the accuracy of which depends on Aviate participants actually emailing results to the union), XJT has approximately 65-70 successful Aviate participants TOTAL in 1st and 2nd waves. Assuming each carrier has a similar pass rate, their should be around 130-140 more successful participants from the other 3 participating carriers based on comparison of their # of pilots to XJT. That equates to 195-210 participants from 1st 2 waves. From what I have heard, it seems the 1st 2 deciles of the FIFO list are CPP participants who have yet to transition. That leaves the 195-210 Aviate participants occupying deciles 3-10. That means approximately 24-26 people per decile. If(and it's a HUGE if) these #s are accurate, then the following would be a general idea of what # you are in FIFO list: Dec 1: 1-25 CPP Dec 2: 26-50 CPP Dec 3: 51-75 Dec 4: 76-100 Dec 5: 101-125 Dec 6: 126-150 Dec 7: 151-175 Dec 8: 176-200 Dec 9: 201-225 Dec 10: 226-250 Look, I know these #s are wrong but by how much is the question. The margin of error is large and if we share some data we can narrow it down. I don't represent the XJT union in any capacity and definitely do not stand by the accuracy of these #s. Maybe we can all get some dialogue going to share what we do know(which isn't much). Interesting, that’s what some of my friends at my carrier (Mesa) have thought too. Very hard getting concrete numbers, but we think it’s 40ish that have passed the interview, which makes our decile a bit smaller.....if it’s only Mesa. So, is the fifo list just for your carrier, or is it everyone on one list? Oh, and at Mesa we have had some of the pilots on the American side pass the interview. They will be on the list a long time since they’ll have to get on the United side to start building the requirement time. |
Originally Posted by 20sx
(Post 2985739)
Interesting, that’s what some of my friends at my carrier (Mesa) have thought too. Very hard getting concrete numbers, but we think it’s 40ish that have passed the interview, which makes our decile a bit smaller.....if it’s only Mesa. So, is the fifo list just for your carrier, or is it everyone on one list?
Oh, and at Mesa we have had some of the pilots on the American side pass the interview. They will be on the list a long time since they’ll have to get on the United side to start building the requirement time. |
Wow two years and list still hasn’t came out.
|
Originally Posted by V1rotate2500
(Post 3469035)
Wow two years and list still hasn’t came out.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands