![]() |
Originally Posted by normalpilot
(Post 3009874)
Commutair just furloughed 250 pilots
|
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3009880)
wow sorry to hear. out of curiosity how far back is that DOH? APC only shows 404 total pilots, sad all the way around
|
The majors are waiting to see what the stimulus package holds for them. If they get something, they will also probably ask for
concessions from the workforce to get them through until at least end of August. By then they will have an understanding of how quickly things are likely to bounce back, depending on things like if the virus is still spreading, how deep of a depression the country is in and how many people are out of work. Then they will decide how many they will have to furlough to make it through the next few years of a downturn. Reginals on the other hand aren’t getting much if anything and that is why you can expect to see high numbers of furloughs in the coming weeks. Then as demand starts to return next year, recalls will likely happen beginning of the year. |
Originally Posted by normalpilot
(Post 3009874)
Commutair just furloughed 250 pilots
wow, that’s over half their list! |
Originally Posted by domino
(Post 3009896)
The majors are waiting to see what the stimulus package holds for them. If they get something, they will also probably ask for
concessions from the workforce to get them through until at least end of August. By then they will have an understanding of how quickly things are likely to bounce back, depending on things like if the virus is still spreading, how deep of a depression the country is in and how many people are out of work. Then they will decide how many they will have to furlough to make it through the next few years of a downturn. Reginals on the other hand aren’t getting much if anything and that is why you can expect to see high numbers of furloughs in the coming weeks. Then as demand starts to return next year, recalls will likely happen beginning of the year. |
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3009726)
Keep in mind Italy is already on the other side of the curve, it took like a month and thousands of deaths. They've been the worst case scenario so far, so it's really up to as a society to learn from other countries' mistakes and make the right decisions.
New York is completely out of control. With that being said, if Majors need to hold in there in order to get federal aid....by the time that happens, situation could've changed completely. Will the economy be destroyed at that point? that I don't know. I would not say Italy is on the other side of the curve. They just had their second day where new cases reported were less than the previous day about a week and a half after ordering all restaurants to be shut down in their quarantine. Social distancing and quarantines do work. Hopefully they can keep the quarantine long enough to sort everything out and contain the spread, but there is no "herd immunity." If they lift the quarantine too soon the virus will take right off again. NYC is most definitely getting worse, as is the rest of the US. The population has to be quarantined until everyone with the virus can be identified and the infected populations can be properly contained. If we take the quarantines seriously, stay home as much as possible, prevent the spread, and shrink the number of infected people and places to something that is known and manageable, this can all be over in a month or two. If we half-ass the quarantine though we'll likely end up with both a highly deadly pandemic that affects just about everybody on top of another GDP-pounding quarantine while we're still hurting from this quarantine. |
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3009915)
I can't wrap my head around this: other than limitations from scope, why would the majors not max out their small aircraft flying? The more you fill up a plane the better right? So since demand is lowered, wouldn't you want to reduce seats on a route by using smaller aircraft? Not to mention cheaper labor...
|
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3009915)
I can't wrap my head around this: other than limitations from scope, why would the majors not max out their small aircraft flying? The more you fill up a plane the better right? So since demand is lowered, wouldn't you want to reduce seats on a route by using smaller aircraft? Not to mention cheaper labor...
Its also likely that a mainline furlough, while eventually saving way more money, has much higher short term costs with all the training events generated by both the furlough and the eventual re-hire. Single fleet airline would be much cheaper to furlough short term, especially if PICs are right seat qualified. |
Tpinks guaranteed there wouldn’t be any furloughs, so never.
|
Originally Posted by normalpilot
(Post 3009874)
Commutair just furloughed 250 pilots
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands