![]() |
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
(Post 3100913)
Less RJ departures, maybe, but I bet RJs flew many more miles. Before Covid, more of my LGA and JFK flights were of the 800-1200 mile variety than the 200-400 mile variety. JFK-DFW, JFK-ORD, LGA-STL, NYC-JAX... these were common 900 routes.
Smaller airplanes, half empty flights, etc. Totally different. Comparing departures between now and then is like comparing apples to oranges, IMO. |
Originally Posted by ninerdriver
(Post 3100913)
Less RJ departures, maybe, but I bet RJs flew many more miles. Before Covid, more of my LGA and JFK flights were of the 800-1200 mile variety than the 200-400 mile variety. JFK-DFW, JFK-ORD, LGA-STL, NYC-JAX... these were common 900 routes.
I agree, the role of the “regional airline“ has changed tremendously trough-out the years, when I was flying the 175 it was all major cities pairings, we were not flying “connecting” flights to the hubs, we were flying the same routes as the 737’s or the 320’s. The question is if the majors will decide to fly only 737’s or 320’s on those routes and remove the “regionals” from their schedules. They will do what is financially advantageous to them, whatever that might be. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by yakfisher
(Post 3100996)
Worst part is the future of years of no
base movements, commuting to reserve, no upgrades, and crappy schedules until some movement returns. With no flying I wonder how long it will take for descent movement to come back. Yes retirements are still happening but airlines are downsizing so the ratio of pilots and flying won’t change much. |
The role of network carriers is to aggregate demand. There’s a lot of money in connecting Birmingham and Montgomery to Seattle and Spokane. Regionals aren’t going away
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands